This is interesting. Under the heading Gravity on gravitycontrol.org there is a long dissertation that I didn’t write. Well, I did write it originally but it seems to have gone through a rewrite software app.
Either that or David Barclay wrote it. I’ll ask him.
The development of Gravity Control would represent a major leap forward in the evolution of science and technology, yet it is academically considered a fringe subject.
When you have a question unanswered like, what is gravity? I would hardly consider it a fringe subject, as the importance of an answer cannot be overly emphasized. The answer is critical to our future and our survival as a species.
If gravity itself is not a force of any kind, but merely the effect of an underlying dynamic force of energy, gravity cannot be controlled directly, as it defies all attempts as such. The control of gravity must be achieved indirectly by the direct manipulation of the underlying force of energy determining a gravitational response.
And in order to achieve this manipulation we must first identify and then comprehend the nature of this underlying force of energy affecting gravity.
Gravity is a non-event as gravity is merely an aspect of the underlying force. Therefore it is imperative that we not think of gravity as a force to be tamed and ultimately controlled, as no such force exists.
Certainly levitating rings and lifters demonstrate an anti-gravitational effect, but they do not allow for gravity control. And despite the best efforts of the various inventors such control is not going to be achieved through the manipulation of a field charge originating from an external source.
The underlying dynamics of field must be understood and applied in an orderly fashion to achieve gravity control. Anything less will meet with failure.
To start we must realize that what we think we know is not enough and what we do not know is critical to our success.
If we begin by examining the process of free fall we will find that the process of free fall and the process of rising skyward are both determined by the same underlying force.
The only difference between falling and rising is that one goes in one direction and the other goes in the opposite direction, but both a falling body of mass and a rising body of mass follow the path of least resistance. So it is the direction of the path which is important to the direction of motion.
The objective or our challenge is to manipulate the path whereby the body of mass must follow the path of least resistance, but the little matter of control is the kicker, as the control must come from within the body in motion and not from without.
When an electrical charge is applied to a metal ring the charge affects the internal dynamics of the ring. The inherent energy of the ring is increased relative to the field in which the ring is situated, which causes the ring to lift skyward. But once the electrical charge is discontinued the ring falls, as the inherent energy of the ring is reduced relative to the field in which it is situated.
The field in which the ring is situated is accelerating symmetrically to the center of the Earth, whereby there is a continuous increase in energy affecting the structural dynamics of the Earth, but there is also the acceleration of the ring’s structure to be considered, which allows the ring to maintain a relative relationship with the field in which it is situated.
If for some reason the acceleration of the ring’s field were to stop accelerating completely the ring would vanish from sight, as it is the continuous acceleration of field which allows the ring to exist in the first place.
So, in order to control the field affecting the lifting of the ring we must build a ring big enough to be manipulated from within, which involves something bigger than that which will fit on a kitchen table.
Certainly we can lift rings and lifters, and we can keep doing this as long as we have the will to do so, but this lifting does not represent gravity control.
To control the underlying energy of a system requires that the internal dynamics be manipulated or modulated relative to the field in which the system exists, which involves the modulation of a field within a field.
This involves the focusing of field where the internal dynamics are focused to affect a differential in dynamic potential between the control system and the field in which the control system is situated.
In this respect both the internal and external dynamics remain inversely proportional in relation to a gravitational response and an electromagnetic response where an electrical charge radiates isometrically from the surface curve of the control system and symmetrically to the center of field.
Therefore there is a decrease in gravity from the surface curve toward the center of field and a decrease in gravity extending isometrically from the surface curve to the perimeter of Universe.
As the underlying energy of field is non-resistant an increase in energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy, whereas a decrease in energy affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.
It should also be noted that the underlying energy of field does not radiate under any circumstance, as the underlying energy is always focused to the center of field. But what does radiate is a factor of resistance, in that the resistance to a further increase in energy increases isometrically from the center of field.
Therefore energy diminishes with distance from the center of field and increases to the center of field.
In the context of this situation energy is not proportional to mass in relation to the accepted concept of energy increasing with every proportional increase in mass, such as described by the equation E=MC2, as no such energy exists.
A decrease in mass affects an increase in energy in relation to a ratio of energy per unit of mass, where the smaller mass has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass.
So it should come as no surprise that we should find it difficult to achieve gravity control, as the accepted standards are in contradiction to the purpose of understanding the dynamics affecting the form and function of physical structure.
It would also be helpful to know that hydrogen has the highest underlying energy potential of any known element and an element like uranium has one of the lowest energy potentials possible, so low that there is an actual energy deficiency whereby nuclear decay attempts to stabilize the dynamics of uranium by increasing it’s underlying energy potential.
In respect to the high energy potential of hydrogen we can see that the tendency of hydrogen to rise skyward is due to the high underlying energy potential affecting its field structure relative to the field in which it exists.
So it is not simply a matter of hydrogen being lighter than air, as this is a somewhat misleading statement. It is the internal dynamics of the hydrogen atom which allow it to rise skyward, as the energy potential is sufficient to lower it’s resistance to the field in which it exists, whereby the path of least resistance is up rather than down.
Therefore gravity control should revolutionize the aerospace industry, as the application of gravity control modifies and simplifies the process of flight.