Entries Tagged 'Odd' ↓

When Einstein realized his initial perception of universe was wrong he referred to it as his greatest blunder…he had initially thought the universe to be static and then discovered it was dynamic and expanding at an ever increasing rate…the expansion of universe is accelerating.  However, he failed to point out that his constant c could not possibly remain static in a dynamic universe.

So here we are today with our modern science quite convinced that the value of c remains constant over the course of many billions of years which is quite an assumption.  This in turn provides a virtual brick wall to further progress in attempting to comprehend the dynamic nature of universe.

Nonetheless Einstein did suggest something completely different…he suggested time to be different for every system in motion, that is every system of universe in motion.  It would seem very few appreciated his attempt at correcting his own errors and as a consequence his suggestion remains a total mystery to most.  Actually it’s not all that difficult to understand what he was attempting to convey so I think it’s fair to suggest his revolutionary suggestion was rocking the boat and making waves.

So what was he talking about?  He was stating something incredibly important…each system of universe, both micro and macro, represents a unified field system whereby a different condition of universe remains relative to each and every system in motion.

Consequently this provides an extremely radical advance in our attempt to comprehend the relative dynamics of time and space.

If we perceive time being different for every system of universe we must also consider that both past and future conditions of universe exist simultaneously and due to the non-absolute nature of time we have no manner by which to know if we ourselves exist in the past or the future despite the fact that we will always perceive ourselves existing in the present.

Take this one step further and you might question the validity of a year, a decade, a century or even a light year…a simultaneous universe does not correspond to our basic evaluation of time…not even close.

Another gem Einstein attempted to convey was the idea that gravity might not itself be an actual force of any kind but could simply be the effect of an underlying force which had yet to be discovered.  This of course would explain why it should be so difficult to control gravity as gravity cannot be manipulated in a controlled manner directly but only through the manipulation of this underlying force of which gravity is simply a dynamic effect.

Einstein might have been wrong about his initial concept of universe but he more than made up for it by making some astounding suggestions which have yet to be fully appreciated.

So let’s go one step further and consider the speed of light…is it possible to actually measure the speed of light or are we kidding ourselves into believing we can?  We measure the speed of light using a clock and a metre rule…how quaint…much like a fast train, a race car or a race horse.

We employ static terms of reference to define the speed of light and assume the calculations provide us with a well defined constant value.  So I have to ask what we might be thinking to make such a blunder or have we even considered the possibility…does light itself actually have a speed?  If light like gravity is simply a dynamic effect of an underlying force it would be impossible for light to be in motion in the manner of a fast train, a race car or even a speeding bullet.  It would be impossible for light to be in motion independent of the space and time in which it is found to exist…in other words light does not itself travel from there to here or from here to there.  Light is bound by the condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference and at the present moment our system of reference is planet Earth…light is not restricted by a speed limit…it’s instantaneous.  The light of distant galaxies does not take so many light years to reach us…what you see is what you get in terms of both past and future conditions of all other systems remaining relative to our system of reference.

Light speed is not a restriction associated with our desire to explore space…it’s a simultaneous universe and the answer to space travel is not bigger rockets or any other form of propulsion…the answer is instantaneous transformation, which is itself the manipulation of time and space.

It occurred to me the other night that our existing perception of ocean tides, earth tides and atmospheric tides is absolutely amazing…the tides have nothing to do with gravity.   There it is for all to see and yet no one seems to have noticed.

This is funny stuff…fall down laughing I should think…it’s a bit hilarious to say the least.

It is said that the gravitational attraction of the moon causes the tide to rise on the moon side and on the opposite side of the planet…I am quoting now from Scientific American…”At the point of the ocean’s surface closest to the moon the lunar gravitational attractive force is strongest and it pulls the ocean toward itself while on the opposite side of the Earth its attractive force is weakest which allows the ocean to bulge outward away from the moon.”

So we have a bulge in the ocean on both sides of the Earth at the same time…and this opposite bulge is explained by weak gravity.

Talk about a left handed way to rationalize the gravity of the moon and or the lack of it.

If the ocean did not form a bulge on opposite sides of the planet and gravity was in fact the activating force the moon and the Earth would immediately come together with a hell of a crunch.

As there is no such force called gravity in that gravity is not itself a force of any kind whatsoever…it is a simple differential in the underlying energy which affects the tides of planet Earth.  Gravity is simply an effect of the underlying force the book Unity refers to as non-linear time field frequency acceleration…the dynamic force of universe.

I hope some of you can see the humor in this.

Oh my this is amazing…the Hubble has allowed scientists to view a Super Nova exploding 10 billion years ago!!!!!

That was before any of us were born no doubt…in fact there was no planet Earth at that time according to our modern science.  So this is really something to shout about I would think…bloody hell I say, no one here at the time and yet we have photographs of the event.

Imagine someone selling you a camera and telling you this camera can take pictures of the past…pretty cool eh?  Oh one little detail the salesperson forgot to mention…you’ll need one of these telescopes…yes, your very own Hubble.

Don’t get me wrong folks because I do think the Hubble is a very fine piece of equipment but this stuff about photographs taken last week or this week of events occurring billions of years ago is a bit over the top…in fact I would call it a really big story…kind of like having an imaginary friend except this is an imaginary story?

How can any serious science writer state that it took ten billion years more or less for the light of this Super Nova to reach the Hubble?  To accept such a statement as factual places the intelligence of the writer in doubt or did they just write what they were told to write?

If this is to be taken seriously we are in deep trouble because we are not thinking but simply buying into this fantastic story about a camera that can take pictures of the past…yes and in color no less.

I have a news flash for you…the universe exists in a dynamic state…yes, dynamic.  Nonetheless linear yardsticks are mentioned in relation to calculating the point in history when this Super Nova exploded…you cannot use a linear yardstick to measure light years nor can you employ metric rulers to do the job.  If…and it’s a huge if…the speed of light has remained static and or constant for billions of years you are in the wrong universe because in order for the speed of light to remain constant requires a static universe and this universe is not static…and here it comes, it’s dynamic.

Light itself is not in motion but the apparent motion of light is simply the effect of the field condition in which it is being observed.

Consequently there are no photographs of events having occurred billions of years ago…not even via the Hubble.

The speed of light is said to be based on the time it takes light to travel a distance of one metre which is 299,792,458ths of a second…this in turn is calculated to equal 299,792,458 metres per second.

Light speed is said to be constant regardless of direction whereby the speed of light has remained constant for billions of years allowing us to calculate the age and size of the visible universe.  However, it appears few are willing to challenge such an assumption of fact.

If the universe exists in a dynamic state or corresponds to a dynamic state there is good reason to challenge the concept of light speed remaining constant for even 299,792,458ths of a second let alone billions of years as in order for light speed to remain constant requires a static condition of universe.  We cannot have our cake and eat it too…the universe is either dynamic or it is static, it’s one or the other but not both and as it turns out the universe is in fact dynamic.

In a dynamic universe one does not find a single absolute standard of value by which to evaluate universe yet such an absolute standard of value is a necessary requirement to not only determine the speed of light but to maintain the constancy of light speed.

The challenge is this…show me an absolute standard of measure applicable to universe and or applicable to determining the speed of light.

Sounds simple enough at first glance I’m sure but it is not as simple as one might assume…keeping in mind that standards of measure are commonly applied to the practices of trade and commerce despite failing to provide an absolute standard of measure.

Some would argue that the difference is too small to measure…but that is the whole point of the challenge.  You cannot simply say close enough and leave it at that when you are talking about a basic factor of understanding by which to evaluate universe.

Scientists say; the Higgs boson could make light-speed travel possible…but on a more serious note de Roeck is reported to have said, “What’s really important for the Higgs is that it explains how the world could be the way it is in the first millionth of a second in the Big Bang.”

Banging seems to highlight the progress science is making towards smashing physical particles into very tiny pieces…pieces so tiny they fade out in no time at all.

How did we ever get this far without stopping to question the absurdity of the idea that it should be possible to understand how the universe came into existence and ended up as it is today by smashing protons into each other at high speed?

The whole idea was to explain why matter has mass and the Higgs boson was thought to be the elusive particle that would shed some light on this perplexing question.

In my mind it reminds me of the story about the nuns having their first meal in America where one of them orders a hot dog while the other nuns are curious to know which part of the dog is hiding in the bun…a bit like the smashing of protons into protons and wondering what part of the proton has been revealed?

It’s amazing, absolutely amazing, that adult men and women could be so excited about such an achievement…a big day for science indeed…they managed to smash protons into tiny particles invisible to the naked eye and in turn announce to the world that the Higgs boson, also known as the God particle, had probably been confirmed.

It has been suggested that the Higgs boson gives physical matter mass and by switching off the Higgs boson it might be possible at some future date to achieve light speed travel in a craft having zero mass.

If this is the existing perception of universe these scientists collectively share I would not hesitate to suggest that we are in one hell of a mess if for no other reason than the shocking truth of the situation…they have no idea why matter has mass…which upon further consideration indicates that they have no idea what a relative condition of universe looks like whether it be a past condition, a future condition or a present condition, they have no idea at all.

Protons traveling at close to our perception of light speed have much mass and very little of the underlying energy required to sustain their dynamic structure, which is why the resulting collision causes the protons to shatter into tiny fragments. The impact at such speed slowed their travel in an abrupt and violent manner causing a sudden increase in the underlying energy which allowed pieces of the proton to scatter away from the point of impact.

However, the scientists at CERN do not acknowledge the existence of an underlying force of energy being involved which allows them to make the story up as they go along and come up with some fantastic ideas such as switching off the Higgs boson and reducing the mass of a spacecraft to zero. It also allows them to make an amazing statement about explaining how the world could be the way that it is in the first millionth of a second in the Big Bang…and on top of this I suspect we have a communication problem.

CERN is a multi billion dollar project, with even more billions yet to be invested. If the whole idea of all this engineering is to make spacecraft mass less and travel at ludicrous linear speeds I would suggest that CERN is not only a toy factory but a virtual playground for those involved. To hell with being practical and spending the resources on something to make the world a better experience for the rest of us when we can spend it on something which will make a select few look like they know a great deal more than they do.

What an achievement, they smashed the protons to bits and as a result have the nerve to tell us they are unlocking the mysteries of the universe.

Maybe if we took a couple of these mega-geniuses and smashed their heads together at high speed we could discover why they are the way they are so many years after their date of birth. Perhaps there is a mind particle that would allow us to switch it off and reduce them to mindless scientists…no more smashing protons to bits.

For that kind of money I’d want something more than…a gateway to a new era that could see humanity unlock some of the universes great mysteries, including dark matter and light-speed travel…but that will take a few more years and a lot more money.