The FLEET Device

This is a device that appears to give out free energy. With this circuit a 3 volt led can be lit by a 1 1/2 volt battery. What does it mean?

This appears to be the no moving parts version of the WMM, the Watson Magnet Motor.  It’s like the Joule Thief, the name in the video, is a virtual version of Charles Watson’s physical magnet motor.

For more about this, Professor Lawrence Tseung of the Tong Wheel and Fleet Device suggests we keep an eye on the Shanghai World Expo for updates.

Fraud Or Fab

At least Searl had people building models.  Otis T. Carr demonstrated his flying saucer by showing a cardboard model.  But he seemed to have more science going on in that Otis Carr had schematics that smack of Unity.

This is Jerry Decker’s account written by his own hand and the dates go back to his BBS days with www.keelynet.com.  I once watched a youtube Searl rollerbar thingy and at the time thought that he too was pressing the gates of Unity but I recall doing some research on Searl where I contacted the BBC about an alleged file in their archive that was supposed to be Searl being seen flying his discs. Later he said the discs failed to levitate due to the presence of the electronic video cameras.

Thank you, Jerry, for the headsup.

s it possible that an antigravity generator exists that can serve as clean source of energy and revolutionize transportation by creating a whole new class of vehicles: vehicles that defy gravity and travel at incredible speeds? I find it hard to believe, but you judge for yourself whether you believe an inventor has the knowhow to make a vehicle that can hover effortlessly and travel at incredible speeds. The story goes like this: A young British professor beset by recurring dreams builds a circular generator composed of magnets and coils. After assembling it, he invites a colleague over and sets the device in motion. Not only does it spin, but the speed of the spin increases without any energy input. Then, unexpectedly, as the two men watch, the device rises up to the ceiling of the laboratory and smashes its way through the roof. Outside it keeps on flying, causing birds that get near it to fall to the ground and tearing roof tiles off buildings. The first flight of a fantastic device. But it wasn’t fantasy to John Searl. He later goes on to develop the Searl Effect Generator and something he calls an Inverted Gravity Vehicle, or a levity disc, otherwise known as a flying saucer. There, I said it. where is this machine? Why isn’t it being built and tested? That’s what other inventors and scientists have asked for years. And according to critics, the reason it hasn’t been tested is simple: It’s a fraud. Searl’s answer, however, is practical: Patent issues prevent him from revealing all the details and the energy generated is so powerful that it could be a security risk to expose details. Also, the device isn’t ready for public release. Searl has supporters and backers who say his invention works. – (He’s been milking this for years and long ago Anders Heerfordt tried to verify his claims, all lies. Sorry, if he HAS something, he hasn’t been able to do anything with it nor has anyone been able to verify it independently. Great early photos but they could have been tricked up like we do now with Photoshop…save your money, this guy ain’t it. Read it for yourself, Checking up on Searl – 1991 and this Reply to Anders by John Thomas – 1996. I’ve met Searl and John Thomas but still, it’s been what, 60 years now and no proof, nothing on the market, insufficient details for others to verify, etc…just a money pit. What John knows is what Searl tells him, so take that all with a big block of salt. Here it is 2010 and still they are promoting and asking for money. There is a lot more to this story…like Searl calling me around 1993 at 4AM cussing me out, saying Heerforts article on KeelyNet had blown a million dollar movie deal, like one of his wealthy investors meeting with me in Dallas around 1996, asking me to remove anything negative about Searl because it hurt their money raising efforts, Searl being ‘discovered’ living in a junkyard babbling to himself (he still does that)…etc…oh yeah…it’s all about bucks and gullible people. Just read this history of John Searl to see he has been milking this since about 1950! – JWD) – Full Article Source

Ending to The First MIB film

Those Men in Black movies are interesting, funny, sometimes amazing.  Such as the ending to MIB Part One:

Apparently the original idea of the men in black came from these comics:

MIB Wikipedia

From the films you can see how they didn’t include any harrowing stories where normal people are threatened by these guys.  A few bad apples?  Time to come clean with the human race so we can get on with the good stuff.

After all, everybody already knows that it’s supposed to be a secret.

Secrecy

When we talk about secrecy on this site we mean, the governments of the world seem to have a secret that perhaps Unity is already somehow in the vaults of those who keep secrets.

For example, here’s a secret that everyone seems to already know.

The Voting Machines Dilemma

in nine parts

WYSIWYG

WYSIWYG means, what you see is what you get.

Within W. David Barclay’s Unity theory is the premise that light has no speed.  It’s either on or off, and all the hoopla and testing of the speed of light can be attributed to human error and insufficient mechanics.  In other words, the lag of the testing devices for the speed of light is giving them a figure of 186000 miles per second.  From this they create light years in explaining the huge distances being dealt with here.

If David’s theory is correct, there are no light years and when you look into space and see things happen far away, they’re happening now, not something based on the false premise of the speed of light.  What you see is what you get.  Whatever the event no matter how far away is happening now, not this clap trap of having happened a zillion years ago and the light (at the speed of light) is just getting to us now.  This appears so skewed but there’s a new observation that supports the Unity theory.

No Time Dilation