Entries Tagged 'Unity' ↓

In the near two years plus fifty that it took David Barclay to assemble the seventeen chapters of Unity, although he did write an introduction, he revised it when he finished the book.  Here now, is the introduction to the theory of Unity: Ever since Newton formulated his gravitational theory we have accepted the simple contention that gravity increases to the center of the Earth and inversely decreases from the center of the Earth in a manner whereby the force of attraction decreases in proportion to the inverse square of the distance…Newton based his theory on some very fancy footwork, which necessitated the invention of calculus. And up to this point the apparent rational logic of his mathematical innovations are considered to be beyond question, as the numbers don’t lie. But despite the accuracy of the mathematical calculations the idealistic legitimacy of linear based geometry being capable of accurately describing the dimensional properties of our planet is extremely doubtful. Unity 

Another slice of Unity by W. David Barclay.

The only reason that space and motion exist, in relation to the
various points and or systems of reference, is due to the non-
absolute nature of universe.

The same underlying principles which determine the relative
spacing and motion of the planets, moons and sun constituting
our solar system also determine the relative spacing and motion
of electrons, protons and neutrons constituting the atomic field
system of each atom, therefore the rules are the same.

It is of the utmost importance that it be clearly understood that
physical structure of any kind exists, regardless of its condition,
as a field of frequency corresponding to the continuous
acceleration of (ntffa).

Unity

Where are we?

In relation to navigating the universe aboard a craft utilizing a field frequency modulator a map is not going to be of much help, at least not a typical star map.

The first rule of thought is to realize the universe is not linearly structured and does not function in a linear manner. Therefore a ruler and a clock are not going to be of much help.

As the universe exists relative to every system in motion or every system of reference the condition of universe is different for each and every system of universe and the craft utilizing the field frequency modulator is no exception, as it is itself a distinct system of reference.

This means the universe is distinctly different for the navigator of such a craft.

A position in space corresponds to a specific rate of non-linear time field frequency acceleration, as all interactions between two or more physical bodies involves a relative differential in non-linear time field frequency acceleration.

In other words you know where you are by means of a differential in non-linear time field frequency acceleration, between the craft you are in and all other systems remaining relative to your craft.

In that space is not linearly structured there is no means by which to measure the distance between yourself and a distant point using a linear unit of measure. So miles and or light years are not going to work because space exists in a dynamic state and as such is either expanding or contracting in a continuous manner.

Our common perception of space suggests that space is an obstacle to be overcome by some form of propulsion, yet in terms of universe existing in a simultaneous state there are no obstacles to overcome.

If space is simply a differential in non-linear time field frequency acceleration the only thing causing you to be separated from any other position in space is non-linear time field frequency acceleration. And as a field frequency modulator modulates non-linear time field frequency acceleration in a controlled manner it is possible to modulate any existing differential in non-linear time field frequency acceleration.

Therefore there is no actual travel involved in respect to getting from here to there.

Rockets are one thing…….gravity control is quite another.

And regardless of where you are you will always perceive yourself to be at the center of universe.

Travel between star systems is instantaneous…….the only way to fly.

So navigating space is very much a multi-dimensional experience in that you experience the non-simultaneous condition of where you are while you also experience the simultaneous condition of universe during transport.

More from W. David Barclay’s Unity

As I am convinced that light is not in linear motion or capable of linear motion, it is critical that we consider the linear bending of light, which I believe to be equally impossible.

Einstein predicted that light passing in close proximity to the sun would be bent outward and away from the sun by the sun’s space/time curve. And sure enough this prediction was confirmed during a solar eclipse, which provided Einstein’s work with quite a boost in popularity.

However, the perceived success of the experiment was based upon a perception of that which was anticipated, in terms of the observed effect.

It was not necessary for the light to pass in close proximity to the sun, in relation to the perceived linear motion of light in order to observe the apparent bending of light. It was only necessary for the field of view to be directed toward the sun, whereby a distortion of field would be noted.

This is a sample of Unity by W. David Barclay.

Another sample from W. David Barclay’s forthcoming book.

It is important to realize that the dimensions of universe are dynamically determined, whereby there must be a factor of dynamic force involved in maintaining the dimensional properties of physical structure. Otherwise the universe would automatically collapse or fold on itself causing the dimensions of structure to simply evaporate or vanish. 

In a round about way this is exactly what physicists were trying to theoretically avoid and why the four dimensional space/time continuum appeared so attractive. And in this respect it was of some importance to describe the dimensions of universe as being self supporting, which is a little bit like suggesting the possibility of magic being involved.

Even Einstein eventually suggested the possibility of an underlying force, but I don’t believe many appreciated the significance of his radical suggestion. Yet it remains an amazing idea, which in my opinion should have been given greater consideration.

This is a sample chapter of Unity by W. David Barclay.