Entries Tagged 'Technology' ↓

Ever wonder why the incidence of cancer is on the rise to the extent that it is now one of the leading causes of death and no sign of a sure fire cure on the horizon?

After 40 years of wrestling with this thorny issue I am convinced the existing application of science and technology is totally inadequate.

Cancer results from the uniform continuance of cells being distorted by a non-uniform distortional effect in that the dynamic form and function of healthy robust cells is dependent on a uniform continuance of form and function.

The list of carcinogens grows longer each year, but why do these materials cause cancer?

Carcinogens have a basic similarity in that they are themselves to some extent distorted or represent an extremely low energy potential, so low in fact that a distortional effect occurs.

Here we have a problem because our modern science does not acknowledge an underlying force of energy affecting the form and function of all physical structure.  Furthermore our modern science dismisses the idea of all physical structure existing as a continuance of form and function.

Consequently the structural dynamics upon which cells are dependent is simply not part of the program.

Of course this is a very strange state of affairs, nonetheless it is what it is…a complete failure to address the root cause of all cancers.

You hear a lot about genes and genetic research, but genes themselves provide no actual information as genes are themselves receptor relays allowing for the appropriate form and function of each cell to be communicated through a continuance of field.

It is the field of each cell which can  become distorted by repeated or prolonged exposure to non-uniform effects from such things as cellphones, microwave transmissions, microwave ovens, high voltage transmission cables,  radioactive materials etc. etc.

And as these distortional effects are cumulative one only has to live long enough to be diagnosed a cancer patient.

Why then is this situation tolerated when we already know what the problem is?

An underlying force of energy changes the basic principles upon which our modern science and medicine is based and the scientific establishment is not prepared to make such a radical change to their knowledge base.

Another aspect of field distortion is genetic deformities which go hand in hand with cancerous anomalies.

As long as the various causes of field distortion are allowed to persist the occurrence of cancer will continue to increase and at the present time there is no indication of anything changing.

What can anyone do?

Dump the cell phone and all wireless operations, place high voltage transmission lines away from human habitation and scrap the nukes.  Ban microwave ovens and  find a method by which to neutralize nuclear waste materials etc. etc.

Someone is going to point out how this might harm the economy as there are billions of dollars involved, which is exactly why they persist…it’s all about the money and has absolutely nothing to do with human health or the health of the planet.

Royal Rife found a way to cure cancer, but in doing so he also exposed the inadequacies of our modern science, which the medical profession was not willing to tolerate.

Exposing corruption and ignorance is not considered acceptable by those who profit by such means even though that was not his intention…Rife simply wanted to cure cancer and any other disease or illness that needed a cure.

Rife was modulating the underlying force of energy inherent to all physical structure and in the process curing cancer patients and in many cases patients who had previously been diagnosed as terminal cases.

Here we are decades later and nothing much has changed.  Billions are poured into cancer research and the promise of a cure remains somewhere ahead.

When are we going to say enough is enough and realize there is an alternative to broken promises and less than honest proposals presented as cancer research intent of discovering a cure?

It’s up to everyone to ask questions and demand honest answers.

If the required knowledge is being suppressed and or hidden from view it’s about time it was brought out into the light of day for all to see, because it does work and it does provide a cure…Rife proved that beyond a doubt and was vilified for his effort.

How many cures need be discovered before even one is to be applied for the benefit of all people?

A mechanical solution to the Field Frequency Modulator, and a presentation of initial drawings by the Gwandau team.

A Field Frequency Modulator, or FFM, is designed to refract and focus the very underlying field which projects and sustains the existence of all matter, time and space in our universe.

The action of this underlying field, described by David Barclay in his Unity theory as the Non Linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, is creating interactive responses known as gravity and electromagnetism.

By refracting and focusing this underlying field through the means of an FFM, the idea is to create a self contained unified field system, thus detaching the FFM from the surrounding unified field system of Earth.

According to the NTFFA-theory, magnets are not themselves the very origin of their attractive and repulsive qualities, but merely acting as a sort of lens refracting the underlying field, where the appearance of attraction and repulsion is caused by a decrease or increase of space created between the poles of the magnets.

Since contemporary science still does’t know what electromagnetism is, and fails to give a satisfactory explanation why a magnet creates attraction, it seems highly important to put David Barclays theory to a proper test.

Furthermore, a success in this attempt will have such a deep impact on the future of humanity that a complete new chapter in the history of mankind will evolve. So there is nothing to lose and everything to gain.

Basic structure of  the FFM Focus Finder – Top View

Building a Field Frequency Modulator is a true challenge in many ways, both regarding the mechanical challenge and all unknown parameters involved..

Since we are exacting high demands on simplicity and functionality it has

taken some time to boil it down to the present solution.

 

Regarding functionality we are well aware that the less unknown parameters

added, the less the risk of distortion of wanted effects.

 

The following parameters had to be avoided in our FFM-alternative:

 

1. No metals of any kind or other eddy-field creating materials.

 

2. No electric or electronic device inside the FFM.

 

3. No outside energy source creating the continuously changing magnet positions.

 

 

The following parameters had to be included in our FFM-alternative:

 

1. A mechanical structure consisting of hardy enough material to withstand the

   magnetic forces created between the neodymium magnets.

 

2. Simultaneous and equally strong momentum applied on each magnet holder

   mechanism, to secure uniformity in the positioning of the magnets.

 

3. Ability to alternate the degree of cone angel of the four tiered construct,

   thereby highly enhancing the focal possibilities.

 

4. The construct made of pieces easily dismantled and reconfigured if needed.

If you drop a ball-bearing and a cannon ball out of an airplane they will both fall at the same rate of acceleration, which means the mass of the body in free fall does not determine the rate of acceleration.

Interesting situation, so what exactly determines the rate of gravitational acceleration?

It might be helpful to realize that gravity itself is not a force of any kind, as gravity is a dynamic response to the condition of field and or the environment in which free fall occurs.

If we accept gravity to be an effect of an underlying force of energy accelerating symmetrically to the center of the earth we just might start to understand why free fall occurs and why the rate of acceleration is the same regardless of the mass of the body falling.

Gravity control is as much about coming down as it is about going up, so if we can grasp the reason why free fall occurs we are half way there in understanding how to achieve gravity control.

Every mass has an energy component just as the planet earth has an energy component and it is this underlying force of energy which determines gravitational acceleration.

On top of this every mass has both internal dynamics and external dynamics, an inside and an outside, whereby the internal and external dynamics remain balanced in order to allow a body of mass to remain structurally stable.

During free fall the falling mass must suffer a decrease in energy relative to the field in which it is falling at a rate proportional to gravitational acceleration.  If the falling mass did not suffer a decrease in energy relative to the field in which it is situated it would not fall.

In fact if it were possible to increase the underlying energy of a mass relative to the field in which it is located not only would it not fall but it would in fact rise skyward.

A simple example of this is a hydrogen balloon, as hydrogen has the highest ratio of energy per unit of mass of any known element, (in relation to the underlying force of energy inherent to all physical structure).   Therefore the reason why hydrogen rises is because of its high energy component.

And yes hydrogen is lighter than the surrounding air, but this is not exactly the whole story.

If we refuse to acknowledge an underlying force of energy determining the form and function of all physical structure we are not going to get very far in respect to gravity control.

I urge you to read chapter four of Unity, by clicking the paragraph below.

It is the underlying force of energy inherent to planet earth which determines the rate of gravitational acceleration being roughly 32.2 feet per second per second and any unsupported mass in close proximity to the earth will fall at this same rate of acceleration.

It would appear that back engineering a UFO type craft is the ultimate goal of the military black ops, but there seems to be a problem in achieving such a goal.

In as much as a crashed UFO might be of some assistance the task is nonetheless a huge challenge, as not only is the technology obviously foreign but so is the science upon which such technology is based.

Without an understanding of the science upon which the technology is based we are left completely in the dark. Therefore it would seem rational to anticipate revisions to our existing science, but the element of secrecy employed puts us at a very real disadvantage in this respect. No such revisions are forth coming it would seem.

The argument put forward is that extraterrestrial craft coming from other parts of the universe are simply not possible, as the speed of light prevents such a thing.

Of course conventional science doesn’t know how to explain extraterrestrial visitors to our planet for the same reason we still view rockets as a legitimate means by which to access space. We have a very disturbing response to anything which threatens our self defined sense of superiority.

But let’s face it, our modern science and our vision of space exploration is only one step ahead of a push-cart mentality. And as long as we view bigger and more powerful rockets as the answer we are not going to get very far.

We only have to consider our existing perception of space, as we view space in terms of a linear perspective. We actually believe we can employ a measuring stick to define the distances involved without considering the universe to be non-linearly structured.

If space itself is not linearly structured our existing perception of the distances involved is completely inadequate. And if space is not linearly structured it is doubtful that time can be measured in linear terms either.

This would suggest that our speed of light limitation might not be applicable, whereby we might not even be right about light having a linear speed.

If this is true we have a lot to learn about engineering a UFO type craft.

For some reason many anticipate the government or the military to one day openly supply the required information, which some believe is presently being kept under wraps for reasons of national security.

If this were true there would have to be scientists and engineers who already know the answers and may have already built a fully functional UFO type craft capable of interstellar access.

I myself don’t believe this to be the case, because, despite the secrecy, there would have to be some tell-tale signs leaking through to the mainstream scientific community and to date no such tell-tale signs are to be found.

I would suggest that the military is somewhat baffled and lacks the necessary skills and resources to achieve such a goal despite a great deal of misinformation and or disinformation suggesting otherwise.

They may have recovered a crashed UFO, but to consider the possibility that such a craft has been successfully back engineered is quite a stretch.

For starters you don’t back engineer a UFO type craft, which might actually be the problem. Such a craft must be developed from the ground up starting with the necessary science and then on to the advanced technology and not the other way around.

I have heard it said that the energy required to develop anti-gravity drive is beyond our present level of ability, but how many realize the subtle fact that we still aren’t exactly sure what energy is? And if we don’t know exactly what energy is how can we be so sure how much energy might be required?

And when you consider we are not sure what gravity is either it should not come as a surprise to discover we might not be bang-on about a few other things as well.

So engineering a UFO type craft would seem a daunting challenge indeed, if not impossible at the present time.

Fortunately there are those among us who have a real passion to understand the how and why of a UFO type craft. And one very small group of enthusiasts involved in this quest are situated within the pages of http://www.gravitycontrol.org

At gravitycontrol you will find both the book Unity and Project Unity, which could very well supply you with the answers you are looking for. And should you discover questions rather than answers, you might consider joining our forum and asking those questions. You never know, we might surprise you with some answers.

A lot of people are of the opinion that water is water is water.

David Suzuki was recently quoted as saying bottled water was toast.

So what’s the deal with water?

Water is H2O, hydrogen and oxygen, but there is something about the hydrogen and the oxygen which is not commonly acknowledged and seemingly misunderstood.

Not all water is equal regardless of purity, as the energy of water differs depending on the size of the water molecules. The smaller the molecules the higher the energy potential of the water, in relation to the ratio of energy per unit of mass where the smaller mass has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass.

Also, the more uniform is the relationship of the water to the host environment the better, as non-uniform distortions can and will affect the quality of the water in relation to its ability to maintain a uniform continuance of form and function associated with any life process.

Many are skeptical of such claims as it is commonly accepted that more is better, whereby more water should provide more energy. However this is a very generalized concept regarding the relationship of energy and mass, regardless of the material in question.

It is not generally accepted that the ratio of energy to mass is dependent on the ratio of energy per unit of mass where the ratio of energy per unit of mass changes in relation to an increase or decrease in mass.

If there was no difference in the ratio of energy per unit of mass it would be impossible to increase or enhance the energy of water and its subsequent effects on the processes of life.

High energy water, having a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass, affects an increase in cellular health in relation to the various forms and functions involved.

Even temperature affects the ratio of energy per unit of mass, where cold water has a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass and warm or hot water has a lower ratio of energy per unit of mass.

A reduction in the size of water molecules affects a corresponding decrease in temperature and an increase in the ratio of energy per unit of mass.

Understanding of course that what I am referring to as energy is the underlying energy affecting both the form and function of physical structure. This underlying energy I refer to as non-linear time field frequency acceleration. Some might think of it as aether energy, zero point energy etc.

Water is not simply water, as there are various states of water in terms of the ratio of energy affecting the form and function of the water itself. The higher the ratio of energy associated with the water the more effective is the water in maintaining and or providing beneficial effects.

Consequently there are health benefits to energized water, despite an inadequate understanding of the dynamics involved.