Entries Tagged 'Science' ↓

The United States Patent and Trademark Office has approved a patent for a space vehicle that is propelled by a superconducting shield that can change the curvature of space-time outside the craft in a way that counteracts gravity. 

See US 6,960,975 to Volfson, entitled “Space vehicle propelled by the pressure of inflationary vacuum state” issued 1 November 2005 

Antigravity devices defy the laws of physics demonstrated empirically by Galileo and formulated by Newton. “This is not the first such patent to be granted, but it shows that patent examiners are being duped by false science,” Robert Park of the American Physical Society in Washington DC said in a report on the matter in Nature magazine.

Previous to that, another patent was awarded to Henry Wm Wallace in 1971:

Antigravity Patent

The US Patent Office has a policy of not awarding patents to antigravity devices because they believe it constitutes the acceptance of perpetual motion.  And yet it did.

The above are but two of several examples of devices that received patents for gravity control and there are others.  The question remains, did they actually build their devices and test them?

The worst read for me was something called The Missing Tesla Papers where within a few pages the author confesses that there are no missing papers by Tesla to be had and gives a description of how everything Tesla was seized and classified, something to do with a cousin who was thought to be a spy, among other things.

Many books about Nikola Tesla give him credit for things he didn’t actually do or the page is vague inferring stuff that is simply conjecture.  For these authors, Jerry Decker coined it best, as, joining the Tesla Church, where the man of miracles could do no wrong, but despite these diatribic ramblings that give the man credit for things he might never have done, Tesla had to give up his place in history and is mostly unknown today due to the likes of JP Morgan who pulled his support when discovering that the mad scientist wanted to deliver free energy to the world at a time when Edison and Westinghouse were already charging a monthly rate for electricity.  Timing.  If Nikola had thought of that when he created the first electric grid for America….but he was known to be no man’s best administrator.  

This is subjective but my best read of Nikola Tesla is My Inventions by Nikola Tesla, in his own words.  You learn about the man from his own writings.

The next best read is that of an elementary teacher who saw that Tesla was being overlooked and pushed to the background of Edison and other American greats:

Tesla Youth

Although My Inventions is a small book by Nikola Tesla, there are volumes on the subject of the “Man Who Invented Tomorrow”, actually I think that’s a paraphrase of a book title.

For me, the best thing about reading of Nikola Tesla is that it’s spiritually uplifting in an old fashioned and forgotten way, that still points the way to a bright future despite our obstacles.

The largest particle accelerator in the world was switched on for the very first time on September 10th and the hullabaloo that preceded it culminated with a suicide in India.  Cataclysmists the world over believed that the Large Hadron Collider would mark the end of the world.  One of the beliefs was that the device would create a black hole that would ultimately swallow the earth.  Scientists who addressed this claim declared the odds at a million to one that this would happen.  The fact that they addressed the possibility with any odds at all doesn’t bode well with the global community and gives rise to the notion that nobody knows what will happen when they begin their particle smashing tests in earnest.

The cost of building the LHC has been pegged at 4.1 billion dollars, almost four times the original budget, and it took 14 years to build it.  

The possibility of an unforeseen catastrophic event has not been addressed other than by enquirers who ask the question, what if?

One headline trumpeted, ‘they turned it on and the world didn’t end, yet’.

The Large Hadron Collider was created to either prove or disprove The Big Bang theory and while they’re doing it we will be messing with the unknown.  Let’s hope for a pleasant surprise instead of waking up one future morning to find we’re all dead and don’t know why.

The Hadron Rap

Update: Hadron Shut Down

A lot of people are of the opinion that water is water is water.

David Suzuki was recently quoted as saying bottled water was toast.

So what’s the deal with water?

Water is H2O, hydrogen and oxygen, but there is something about the hydrogen and the oxygen which is not commonly acknowledged and seemingly misunderstood.

Not all water is equal regardless of purity, as the energy of water differs depending on the size of the water molecules. The smaller the molecules the higher the energy potential of the water, in relation to the ratio of energy per unit of mass where the smaller mass has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass.

Also, the more uniform is the relationship of the water to the host environment the better, as non-uniform distortions can and will affect the quality of the water in relation to its ability to maintain a uniform continuance of form and function associated with any life process.

Many are skeptical of such claims as it is commonly accepted that more is better, whereby more water should provide more energy. However this is a very generalized concept regarding the relationship of energy and mass, regardless of the material in question.

It is not generally accepted that the ratio of energy to mass is dependent on the ratio of energy per unit of mass where the ratio of energy per unit of mass changes in relation to an increase or decrease in mass.

If there was no difference in the ratio of energy per unit of mass it would be impossible to increase or enhance the energy of water and its subsequent effects on the processes of life.

High energy water, having a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass, affects an increase in cellular health in relation to the various forms and functions involved.

Even temperature affects the ratio of energy per unit of mass, where cold water has a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass and warm or hot water has a lower ratio of energy per unit of mass.

A reduction in the size of water molecules affects a corresponding decrease in temperature and an increase in the ratio of energy per unit of mass.

Understanding of course that what I am referring to as energy is the underlying energy affecting both the form and function of physical structure. This underlying energy I refer to as non-linear time field frequency acceleration. Some might think of it as aether energy, zero point energy etc.

Water is not simply water, as there are various states of water in terms of the ratio of energy affecting the form and function of the water itself. The higher the ratio of energy associated with the water the more effective is the water in maintaining and or providing beneficial effects.

Consequently there are health benefits to energized water, despite an inadequate understanding of the dynamics involved.

Carbon this and carbon that and don’t leave any carbon footprints in the sand.

Too much carbon they tell us, climate change is all about carbon and we are to blame.

All those cars and trucks leaving carbon in their wake. So get out of your car and ride a bike or take the bus.

But is carbon really the problem or is it something else, something like oxygen.

Hello, what’s this about oxygen? How could oxygen be a problem?

If you have a shortage of oxygen you most certainly do have a problem. A little hard to breathe without enough oxygen.

Dead zones in the ocean, a shortage of oxygen in the water. And water with a concentration of less than 30% oxygen gets you a whole lot of dead fish.

On top of this the concentration of oxygen in the atmosphere is dropping. And when it gets down to 13% there are going to be a lot of dead people, not to mention all the dogs, cats, horses and cows etc.

Unfortunately our atmosphere is slowly escaping into space. Something most people don’t seem to realize.

The oxygen content of our atmosphere has been dropping for a long time and now stands at just a bit under 20%.

So why are we so wrapped up with carbon and climate change?

Because someone told us we could fix the problem by reducing the carbon content of the atmosphere……..you can? Sure someone told you this, but is it possible to effectively reduce the carbon content of the earth’s atmosphere?

Sure we can improve air quality on a local level and we should, but can we effect the planet’s atmosphere to any measurable degree?  And in turn will this have any effect on climate change?

Even if you do reduce the carbon content a tiny bit you have done nothing to improve the oxygen content……the oxygen content of the atmosphere will still continue to decline.

The total carbon content of our atmosphere is a tiny fraction of 1%, yet it is loudly proclaimed that this is a threat to the health of the planet, but not a word about the declining oxygen content.

Climate change is not something you fix, unless of course you can adjust the energy of the sun and you can’t.

It is a dynamic relationship between the sun and the planets that drives climate and climate change, but this is not an acceptable explanation due to the fact that there is absolutely nothing any of us can do to change such a situation.

Regardless of what we do climate change will continue to revise the condition of our earth’s biosphere.