Why should the fossil fuel industry receive subsidies, huge sums of money, when solar power is more efficient and cheaper to produce….it saves money.
Solar power cells could make the USA energy self sufficient if the same level of funding was applied as is now applied to the fossil fuel industries.
Huge profits are made from fossil fuels, yet these industries are also collecting corporate welfare which amounts to billions of dollars all of which is funded by the tax payer who is also the consumer.
Adequate funding of solar power would create many thousands of new jobs, jobs that are desperately needed…it would also allow North America to become self sufficient in respect to its energy needs now and in the future.
Solar power cells are efficient and cost effective, with minimal pollution.
Let’s get solar cell technology out into the light of day and reveal it for what it is…the answer to our energy needs.
It has been proven in countries receiving a fraction of the sunlight the USA receives during a year and it’s working very well. It would work even better in Canada and the USA.
There are answers, there are solutions, but is there the will to make the leap?
The sun exists relative to the earth and of course the earth exists relative to the sun, but the relative relationship existing between the sun and the earth and the earth and the sun are two different things, a critical point which our modern science tends to ignore.
Then we have the moon which adds a third factor to the mix whereby we have twelve different relative conditions to consider in our attempt to understand the various effects each one has on the other two.
To consider the activity involved in the solar cycle culminating in 2012 and or 2013 we must understand the relationship of the sun to the earth and the earth to the sun.
In terms of time field frequency acceleration the earth has a much lower rate of acceleration than the sun, therefore the sun existing relative to the earth must be viewed as a historical aspect of the sun’s continuance.
This becomes apparent in respect to our historical testing of nuclear weapons as early as 1945. For all intents and purposes our nuclear testing appeared to have no effect upon either the sun or the moon so we assumed all was well and continued testing. However we did not consider the field frequency acceleration differential existing between the sun and the earh or the field frequency acceleration differential existing between the moon and the earth.
What does this mean to us today?
It means we have yet to experience the effects our nuclear testing has had on the sun and moon due to field frequency differentials, which can be also referred to as time/line differentials.
To understand this more clearly you might read the book Unity which is available as a free down load on this web site.
The full impact of our nuclear testing has yet to manifest in a manner affecting our present condition as the effect of a nuclear detonation is simultaneous regardless of the distance involved, which allows such an effect to cross time/line boundaries.
This of course provides us with a false sense of safety in respect to our nuclear agenda, as we have assumed there to be no significant consequences associated with our neighboring sun and moon. This however is far from the truth due to our lack of understanding and comprehension of time/line differentials.
It would appear there are indeed significant consequences, a moot point we have yet to fully appreciate.
We rely on fuels for transportation, a non-renewable resource, and since the age of industrialization began its been slowly killing our planet. The latest oil spill off the coast of Louisianna is yet another reminder of that we are an unsustainable course and desperately need to find new alternatives to energy for our cars and homes.
Our reliance on fuel is of greater concern than most may realize, just look at the amount of deaths cause by CO2 emmissions. Or take a closer look in real time the rate that barrels of oil are pumped, accumulation of CO2 emmissions, and respiratory infections. Link
To the huge corporations, this is a wake up call. Of the top 10 in the Fortune 500 list, 7 are directly related to oil, and one is a car manufacturer. Since big business probably sets the policies as often or more than the government, it seems unlikely that these companies are concerned with anything other than profits.
Take a look at the following graphic illustrating the oil spill caused by a BP oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico. If the oil well causing the spill isn’t plugged in 50 days, it will overtake Exxon Valdez as the largest oil spill in U.S. history. (click image for larger view)
A look at what’s happened:
Does it seem that there is much more to fear that emissions? Everything works in cycles. The precipitation in the air that waters the food we grow comes from the sea. Are we unconsciously poisoning ourselves?
The demand for energy is only going to increase as the population does, and as developing nations become more affluent their increases use further compounds the problem.
The need for renewable energy or sustainable energy is practically beyond the eleventh hour. Sorry for the doom and gloom, but something is going to give without change.
A four hour show on time control technology, which was and is extremely interesting, but not quite what I expected. So on one hand I was a bit disappointed, yet on the other hand I was excited to hear Dr. Anderson talking about the control of time.
Yes, he can manipulate time in what he claims to be a controlled manner, but he does not appear to understand the principles involved in respect to the dynamic nature of time itself.
Time is a flow of energy, where a slowing of time’s acceleration reduces the available energy and an increase in time’s acceleration increases the available energy relative to the system being controlled.
It would appear Dr. Anderson has not quite got the basic idea nailed down as he makes reference to a space time warp, which suggests a distortional effect. But this is not time control in the sense of that which is being suggested, keeping in mind that he assures Art Bell and the listening audience that he has developed time control technology just as some suggest having developed gravity control technology, but it is not that.
I suppose this is along the line of the idea; if it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck it must be a duck.
In my view this is a case of the scientist getting a little bit out of touch with the natural world around them, as nature provides many examples of time field differentials. Such an example is the accelerated growth of plants grown deep underground in horticultural nurseries where a 300 & 400% increase in the rate of growth has been documented, plus an increase in resistance to various plant diseases once transplanted to surface sites.
In this example there is no distortional effect but a uniform increase in the rate of growth due to an increase in the acceleration of time itself.
Again it is necessary to emphasize the non-linear nature of time and the need to re-evaluate the existing concept of a space/time continuum, which is generally viewed in terms of a linear relationship. If we are to move forward it is critical to have the basic principles clearly fixed in our minds otherwise we are placing ourselves at a distinct disadvantage.
Here at GC the Gwandau team are attempting to develop a method by which to measure the acceleration of time and the inherent increase in energy associated with that acceleration. Not an easy task, but one worth pursuing.
We also have the book Unity which explains the basic principles involved in the context of a time field continuance.
I wish Dr. Anderson all the best with his research and remain ever hopeful that there is indeed light at the end of the tunnel.
