Entries Tagged 'News' ↓

A lot of people are of the opinion that water is water is water.

David Suzuki was recently quoted as saying bottled water was toast.

So what’s the deal with water?

Water is H2O, hydrogen and oxygen, but there is something about the hydrogen and the oxygen which is not commonly acknowledged and seemingly misunderstood.

Not all water is equal regardless of purity, as the energy of water differs depending on the size of the water molecules. The smaller the molecules the higher the energy potential of the water, in relation to the ratio of energy per unit of mass where the smaller mass has the higher ratio of energy per unit of mass.

Also, the more uniform is the relationship of the water to the host environment the better, as non-uniform distortions can and will affect the quality of the water in relation to its ability to maintain a uniform continuance of form and function associated with any life process.

Many are skeptical of such claims as it is commonly accepted that more is better, whereby more water should provide more energy. However this is a very generalized concept regarding the relationship of energy and mass, regardless of the material in question.

It is not generally accepted that the ratio of energy to mass is dependent on the ratio of energy per unit of mass where the ratio of energy per unit of mass changes in relation to an increase or decrease in mass.

If there was no difference in the ratio of energy per unit of mass it would be impossible to increase or enhance the energy of water and its subsequent effects on the processes of life.

High energy water, having a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass, affects an increase in cellular health in relation to the various forms and functions involved.

Even temperature affects the ratio of energy per unit of mass, where cold water has a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass and warm or hot water has a lower ratio of energy per unit of mass.

A reduction in the size of water molecules affects a corresponding decrease in temperature and an increase in the ratio of energy per unit of mass.

Understanding of course that what I am referring to as energy is the underlying energy affecting both the form and function of physical structure. This underlying energy I refer to as non-linear time field frequency acceleration. Some might think of it as aether energy, zero point energy etc.

Water is not simply water, as there are various states of water in terms of the ratio of energy affecting the form and function of the water itself. The higher the ratio of energy associated with the water the more effective is the water in maintaining and or providing beneficial effects.

Consequently there are health benefits to energized water, despite an inadequate understanding of the dynamics involved.

Carbon this and carbon that and don’t leave any carbon footprints in the sand.

Too much carbon they tell us, climate change is all about carbon and we are to blame.

All those cars and trucks leaving carbon in their wake. So get out of your car and ride a bike or take the bus.

But is carbon really the problem or is it something else, something like oxygen.

Hello, what’s this about oxygen? How could oxygen be a problem?

If you have a shortage of oxygen you most certainly do have a problem. A little hard to breathe without enough oxygen.

Dead zones in the ocean, a shortage of oxygen in the water. And water with a concentration of less than 30% oxygen gets you a whole lot of dead fish.

On top of this the concentration of oxygen in the atmosphere is dropping. And when it gets down to 13% there are going to be a lot of dead people, not to mention all the dogs, cats, horses and cows etc.

Unfortunately our atmosphere is slowly escaping into space. Something most people don’t seem to realize.

The oxygen content of our atmosphere has been dropping for a long time and now stands at just a bit under 20%.

So why are we so wrapped up with carbon and climate change?

Because someone told us we could fix the problem by reducing the carbon content of the atmosphere……..you can? Sure someone told you this, but is it possible to effectively reduce the carbon content of the earth’s atmosphere?

Sure we can improve air quality on a local level and we should, but can we effect the planet’s atmosphere to any measurable degree?  And in turn will this have any effect on climate change?

Even if you do reduce the carbon content a tiny bit you have done nothing to improve the oxygen content……the oxygen content of the atmosphere will still continue to decline.

The total carbon content of our atmosphere is a tiny fraction of 1%, yet it is loudly proclaimed that this is a threat to the health of the planet, but not a word about the declining oxygen content.

Climate change is not something you fix, unless of course you can adjust the energy of the sun and you can’t.

It is a dynamic relationship between the sun and the planets that drives climate and climate change, but this is not an acceptable explanation due to the fact that there is absolutely nothing any of us can do to change such a situation.

Regardless of what we do climate change will continue to revise the condition of our earth’s biosphere.

An ancient organism from the pit of a collapsed volcano may hold the key to tomorrow’s hydrogen economy. Scientists from across the world have formed a team to unlock the process refined by a billions-year old archaea.

Link

Google co-founder Sergey Brin wants to go to space and has made a $5 million down payment to book a seat on a future orbital space flight to the International Space Station planned in the next few years with Space Adventures. More…