Entries Tagged 'more than odd' ↓

Experiment Opera has resulted in a radical story concerning the speed of light.

Reuters reports that Antonio Ereditato and his team at the Cern Particle Research Centre sent 15000 beams of neutrinos speeding from one place to another whereby they arrived at their destination 60 nanoseconds ahead of schedule.

From this it has been determined that the neutrinos were traveling faster than light speed. This suggests that Einstein’s relativity could be overturned as it has been assumed impossible for mass to travel faster than the speed of light.

It may be that the speed of light was not exceeded at all but that light speed is not at all constant.

Keep in mind that the speed of light is the time it takes light to travel a distance of one metre…which is 1/299,792,458ths of a second and that this value was standardized many years ago on the basis of light speed fluctuating from place to place. The whole idea of a standard value was to eliminate confusion but at the same time failed to question the constancy of light speed.

I would suggest that the alleged neutrinos did not exceed the speed of light but simply traveled at the speed of light as it is at the present time.

No rules have been broken and no speed limits exceeded.

Unfortunately light does not itself have a speed as described…what is measured is a time factor and nothing more.

The idea light speed should remain constant for billions of years in a dynamic universe seems a bit less than rational, just as the idea of it being possible to clock the speed of light in the same manner as a race horse seems a bit less than rational.

At some point a distinction must be made between the speed of a horse in terms of a linear evaluation and the apparent speed of light in terms of a non-linear evaluation.

A truly dynamic universe does not produce or require the aid of a universal constant as the only universal constant is change…sometimes fast and sometimes slow but change nonetheless.

When you know more than you ever wanted to know and more than you ever thought it possible to know you discover you don’t know much at all.  Nonetheless I feel obliged to warn you that the worst is yet to come.

Here at Gravity Control we have attempted to engage many in our quest to make new science and technology available to the world in the hope of not only providing for a new view of gravity and energy, but to offer an alternative to fossil fuels and nuclear power plants.  Unfortunately there is much opposition to such an idea.

The power brokers of the world are not interested in serving the interests of the masses but in serving their own self interests.  The cost to the masses cannot be under estimated or under stated as the consequences of deliberate manipulation are far beyond the ability of a sane mind to fully comprehend.

And what is it that is deliberately manipulated?

That covers just about everything from A to Z, as even the concept of freedom and liberty are deliberately manipulated.

Deception is the standard ploy by which accountability and transparency can be systematically avoided.  And if anyone should question the validity of such profound deception they are rebuked and reminded that; we will not tolerate wild conspiracy theories.  Such a statement avoids having to engage in any real discussion intent on distinguishing fact from fiction.

How many inside jobs does it take to make it clear to everyone that deception is the primary force manipulating the hearts and souls of the masses…to justify their fear…that they too should not tolerate wild conspiracy theories?

The inside job is not hidden, it remains in plain view for all to see and hear, yet presented in such an extreme format to allow questions of doubt to obscure what should be obvious to any rational thinking mind.

It is the extreme nature of the action which is calculated to have its intended effect…as for most it is beyond belief if for no other reason than it defies what is commonly accepted to be logical and sane.

And if an inside job is presented in full view for all to see and hear, dare we ask what more remains hidden from our view?

Who will answer for you and who will answer for me…we…each and everyone of us must answer for our selves…you are the only one who can answer for you and I am the only one who can answer for me.

Light speed is considered a constant and who dares to argue the point?

I dare say I’m willing to give it a go…light speed is determined to be 299,792,458 meters per second based on the observers perception of light traveling a distance of one meter in exactly 1/299,792,458ths of a second.

The first problem with this is the terms employed as they are completely inadequate.  Sure they might be applicable to many aspects of trade and commerce but not very useful in this case.

On top of this it is assumed that light travels in a linear fashion, much like a train or a speeding bullet, but having no mass.  And of course this is quite impossible if for no other reason than the universe failing to cooperate, as the universe is not linearly structured.  Therefore space cannot be measured using a ruler and a clock.

As the universe exists in a dynamic state it would follow that light being a common occurrence throughout the universe would also exist in a dynamic state, which disqualifies the concept of a constant, in respect to the perception of light having a speed.

It is important to keep in mind that Einstein employed the concept of light speed remaining constant due to his view at the time, 1905, that the universe existed in a static state.  In later years he came to realize this was not the case, but it would seem many others missed the point.

Today light speed is employed to determine the size and age of universe, with scientists reporting having taken photographs of distant galaxies.  In this respect they ask us to accept their perception of space in that they have photographed events having occurred billions of years ago, with the photographed subject being situated billions of light years distance from Earth.

Therefore it is believed that the outer boundary of the visible universe is some 14 billion light years away with the universe expanding at a fantastic rate.

Keep in mind that to make any kind of sense of this one must accept the constancy of light speed over a period of roughly 14 billion years, which is a stretch of the imagination to say the least.

Some years ago it was determined that the universe existed in simultaneous state, with Einstein adding his two cents worth as well…he stated clearly that; “time is different for every system in motion.”  And what an amazing statement that was and still is,  but unfortunately not very well understood.

This means that both past and future conditions exist relative to our earth with both past and future conditions existing simultaneously.  This suggests time is different for every planetary body in space.

In a simultaneous universe you do not find or even need light traveling for millions or even billions of years to reach us.  What you see is what you get whether it be a past condition or a future condition existing simultaneously.

Time is a relative factor of space, which is dynamic, therefore light speed over such distances cannot be constant if in fact light does have a speed.

It’s the perception of the beast that fools us into believing we have it right, but in fact we have it wrong.  Light is simply a condition of field, just as gravity is a condition of field and neither one has a speed or a speed limit we can refer to as a constant.

Light is incapable of linear motion, as for it to do so it would have to be in motion independent of the field in which it is observed to be situated and this is not the case.

Light speed is said to be constant coming or going, which again relies on one’s imagination to remain acceptable.  Of course Mich and Morley did their famous experiment and had great difficulty in accepting its failure, but I don’t think it was a failure, not at all.

If they had found a difference in light speed they would have proven light to be capable of linear motion, but they did not prove anything of the kind.  If light has no actual speed the results of their experiment demonstrated the point very clearly because direction would not matter in the slightest.

The only thing being measured in respect to light speed is a time delay and nothing more.

The motion of the light is not a factor as the motion of light cannot be measured in terms of so many meters per second.  Consequently the size and age of universe remains an unknown.

A time delay corresponding to the assumed speed of light is as fast as any reaction can be affected in the context of our relative existence on this planet.  But it has nothing to do with the motion of light traveling from point A to point B, because light does not travel in a linear fashion as does a train or a speeding bullet.

The existing perception of universe is limited to the scope of our existing scientific dogma, which is not at all helpful in moving us forward to a fundamental comprehension of universe and our relationship to universe.

It might get you high marks on an exam, but it wont get you any closer to knowing much about our universe.

Light speed is a critical point and deserves a complete rethink and a complete overhaul.  We need to know one way or the other if light has a speed…it either does or it doesn’t.

Light is either on or off, if it’s on it’s visible and if it’s off it’s not.

It only takes light 8 minutes to travel from the sun to the Earth if light is actually in motion, if it is not in motion there is no travel time because it’s not traveling.

If in fact there is a time delay between the sun and the earth that time delay remains relative to our planet earth…put the same instruments on the moon and the time delay will be considerably shorter.  But in neither case is the lights motion required or even possible.

Think about it…peer reviewed papers cannot change the reality of universe, the universe dictates the laws and principles applicable to understanding and comprehension.

It’s the latest buzz, anti-matter is soon to be available in a store near you.

The idea of there being such a thing as anti-matter should at the very least cause some difficult questions to be asked, which in turn would require some solid answers.  But this is not the case at all as it is assumed that anti-matter provides a balancing point for normal matter.

It is assumed that at the start of the big bang there was in fact an equal quantity of matter and anti-matter with matter winning out and anti-matter simply vanishing into whatever anti-matter vanishes into.

However, the whole idea is not exactly a good one as the very existence of anti-matter is based on a very shaky theory concerning the origin of universe, where one assumption is based on another assumption which in turn supports two more assumptions and so on and so on.

Now we have students who are attempting to capture anti-matter in a magnetic frozen trap, which sounds about as well understood as the frozen light experiment.  But a little misunderstanding shouldn’t be allowed to stand in the way of progress now should it?

Before we go waving flags and shouting anti-matter from the roof tops we should first consider the possibility that we just might be looking at the basic bones of universe upside down and back to front.  And if we turn the picture up the right way and turn it around so we can see the front of the picture we might just discover a few things finally making a bit of sense.

Without considering a basic underlying energy sustaining and perpetuating all physical structure we are not apt to make much progress towards a better understanding of universe.  And as simple as such an understanding might be it is not at all easy to grasp if only due to our insistence in holding the picture upside down and back to front.

The book Unity, available as a free download from this web site attempts to explain the nature of this underlying energy sustaining and perpetuating the structural dynamics of all physical matter.  From this we can clearly understand that matter can in fact vanish and can in turn reappear.  Matter, physical matter, can in fact be transformed from one time/line state to another and back again as often as we please.

I’m sorry kids but there is no anti-matter, but there is something even better which actually exists and has a practical application…and that something is time field frequency acceleration which can be modulated in a controlled fashion allowing for instantaneous transformation.

Check it out…you might be glad you did.

The sun exists relative to the earth and of course the earth exists relative to the sun, but the relative relationship existing between the sun and the earth and the earth and the sun are two different things, a critical point which our modern science tends to ignore.

Then we have the moon which adds a third factor to the mix whereby we have twelve different relative conditions to consider in our attempt to understand the various effects each one has on the other two.

To consider the activity involved in the solar cycle culminating in 2012 and or 2013 we must understand the relationship of the sun to the earth and the earth to the sun.

In terms of time field frequency acceleration the earth has a much lower rate of acceleration than the sun, therefore the sun existing relative to the earth must be viewed as a historical aspect of the sun’s continuance.

This becomes apparent in respect to our historical testing of nuclear weapons as early as 1945.  For all intents and purposes our nuclear testing appeared to have no effect upon either the sun or the moon so we assumed all was well and continued testing.  However we did not consider the field frequency acceleration differential existing between the sun and the earh or the field frequency acceleration differential existing between the moon and the earth.

What does this mean to us today?

It means we have yet to experience the effects our nuclear testing has had on the sun and moon due to field frequency differentials, which can be also referred to as time/line differentials.

To understand this more clearly you might read the book Unity which is available as a free down load on this web site.

The full impact of our nuclear testing has yet to manifest in a manner affecting our present condition as the effect of a nuclear detonation is simultaneous regardless of the distance involved, which allows such an effect to cross time/line boundaries.

This of course provides us with a false sense of safety in respect to our nuclear agenda,  as we have assumed there to be no significant consequences associated with our neighboring sun and moon.  This however is far from the truth due to our lack of understanding and comprehension of time/line differentials.

It would appear there are indeed significant consequences, a moot point we have yet to fully appreciate.