Entries Tagged 'more than odd' ↓

It seems almost unbelievable that there are still people attempting to debunk UFOs.

At the same time there is a wealth of disinformation being peddled concerning UFOs and UFO abductions. And of course this is a very profitable business for some of the big names in the UFO field.

Then there are those who want us to believe they have personally been involved in black ops attempting to back engineer a UFO. Something the government and the military view as top secret information, but these whistle blowers can say anything they want.

Yes, they can say anything they want as long as they don’t come up with any actual evidence, because producing evidence is viewed as a breach of national security, something which is definitely not encouraged.

Some would have us believe that UFO are fueled by an exotic unstable element, such as element 115, but as long as it falls under the heading of disinformation it’s okay with the security crowd.

So how do you discern disinformation from the real thing?

A difficult call if you haven’t read the UFO Operators Manual and looked under the heading of “energy requirements.” And even if you did have the Operators Manual open to the page covering energy requirements you might find it difficult to understand, as there is no reference to fuel capacity or the type of fuel required. In fact it would appear no fuel of any kind is mentioned.

This might cause some to suspect this may not be an actual UFO Operators Manual, but more disinformation or an outright hoax. But if a UFO is as exotic as we might suspect it may not require a fuel supply. In fact fuel might not be a reasonable consideration in relation to the function of a UFO.

UFO are capable of interstellar access, which is far beyond anything we are even capable of considering in light of our existing knowledge of time and space. So it would seem reasonable to anticipate something quite unexpected in the way of “energy requirements.”

If no fuel is required, but an exotic form of energy which is actually invisible. the whole idea might represent a very difficult selling job.

The good news is that the exotic form of energy required is not so exotic after all, in fact it’s available everywhere and anywhere throughout the universe. In fact UFOs in the form of flying saucers of extraterrestrial origin produce their own energy supply as required.

In fact this is the very same energy that sustains and perpetuates all physical structure including our planet earth, the moon and sun. Consequently there is no shortage of the needed energy.

All that is required is a frame by which to focus the energy of universe, in relation to a unified field system capable of modulating the underlying energy remaining relative to it. It’s that simple.

It would appear that back engineering a UFO type craft is the ultimate goal of the military black ops, but there seems to be a problem in achieving such a goal.

In as much as a crashed UFO might be of some assistance the task is nonetheless a huge challenge, as not only is the technology obviously foreign but so is the science upon which such technology is based.

Without an understanding of the science upon which the technology is based we are left completely in the dark. Therefore it would seem rational to anticipate revisions to our existing science, but the element of secrecy employed puts us at a very real disadvantage in this respect. No such revisions are forth coming it would seem.

The argument put forward is that extraterrestrial craft coming from other parts of the universe are simply not possible, as the speed of light prevents such a thing.

Of course conventional science doesn’t know how to explain extraterrestrial visitors to our planet for the same reason we still view rockets as a legitimate means by which to access space. We have a very disturbing response to anything which threatens our self defined sense of superiority.

But let’s face it, our modern science and our vision of space exploration is only one step ahead of a push-cart mentality. And as long as we view bigger and more powerful rockets as the answer we are not going to get very far.

We only have to consider our existing perception of space, as we view space in terms of a linear perspective. We actually believe we can employ a measuring stick to define the distances involved without considering the universe to be non-linearly structured.

If space itself is not linearly structured our existing perception of the distances involved is completely inadequate. And if space is not linearly structured it is doubtful that time can be measured in linear terms either.

This would suggest that our speed of light limitation might not be applicable, whereby we might not even be right about light having a linear speed.

If this is true we have a lot to learn about engineering a UFO type craft.

For some reason many anticipate the government or the military to one day openly supply the required information, which some believe is presently being kept under wraps for reasons of national security.

If this were true there would have to be scientists and engineers who already know the answers and may have already built a fully functional UFO type craft capable of interstellar access.

I myself don’t believe this to be the case, because, despite the secrecy, there would have to be some tell-tale signs leaking through to the mainstream scientific community and to date no such tell-tale signs are to be found.

I would suggest that the military is somewhat baffled and lacks the necessary skills and resources to achieve such a goal despite a great deal of misinformation and or disinformation suggesting otherwise.

They may have recovered a crashed UFO, but to consider the possibility that such a craft has been successfully back engineered is quite a stretch.

For starters you don’t back engineer a UFO type craft, which might actually be the problem. Such a craft must be developed from the ground up starting with the necessary science and then on to the advanced technology and not the other way around.

I have heard it said that the energy required to develop anti-gravity drive is beyond our present level of ability, but how many realize the subtle fact that we still aren’t exactly sure what energy is? And if we don’t know exactly what energy is how can we be so sure how much energy might be required?

And when you consider we are not sure what gravity is either it should not come as a surprise to discover we might not be bang-on about a few other things as well.

So engineering a UFO type craft would seem a daunting challenge indeed, if not impossible at the present time.

Fortunately there are those among us who have a real passion to understand the how and why of a UFO type craft. And one very small group of enthusiasts involved in this quest are situated within the pages of http://www.gravitycontrol.org

At gravitycontrol you will find both the book Unity and Project Unity, which could very well supply you with the answers you are looking for. And should you discover questions rather than answers, you might consider joining our forum and asking those questions. You never know, we might surprise you with some answers.

Hi there, I’m the guy who wrote the book Unity.

When I wrote Unity I had the new energy crowd in mind, as well as the various space agencies of the world, because you may have missed something very important.

Yes, I know its a bit boring and seems almost like preschool to many of you, but if you don’t have the basics, the rock bottom basics, down pat you are not going to get very far with your various attempts at tapping into an actual energy source.

There is only one energy…and you can call it whatever you want, such as zero point, aether energy, field energy or non-linear time field frequency acceleration, but that is the bottom line…that one energy.

Every single aspect of universe is determined on the basis of that one energy.

Every single system of universe has an energy field and it is the interaction of the various energy fields creating differentials in energy which determines the form and function of all physical structure.

So, we have this one basic energy as the cause of all interactions and reactions of universe.

And if we don’t know how to modulate that energy to accommodate our needs we are pissing in the breeze, so to say.

Robert Park would call it false science, but Robert doesn’t know of what he speaks. What he refers to as science is all about thought control and people control. Can’t have you thinking outside the barn now can they, no sir that would not be in the best interest of the few who want to control the many. And control they do, whether we like it or not.

Want anti-gravity, think focus, because gravity is not a force of any kind, no it is not.

Gravity is a dynamic response to the condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference and is an effect of the underlying energy of that system.

No mechanics involved…none, zip, zero. A dynamic continuance of universe is what we are dealing with and the only way we are going to move forward is by applying the underlying dynamics to our specific purpose and or intent.

Whether it’s aerospace engineering, medicine, agriculture, geology, astrophysics or any other field of endeavor we need to know the basics by which physical structure is possible, the basics by which life is possible and the basics by which space exploration and colonization is possible.

If we fail to realize the significance of the most fundamental aspect of our existence and the continuing existence of this universe we are not going to make it as a civilization, we will fail.

But, I am hopeful, very hopeful that some of you are going to take the time and read what I have to say. I am hopeful that you might realize the significance of getting the bare bones basics right.

And should any of you have a question about any of this, please, please, please ask and I will do my best to answer.

David

Anyone reading the book Unity will encounter my views regarding the use of static linear terms attempting to evaluate a dynamic universe.Not something you want to try while balancing a full cup of coffee.

For some unknown reason the non-absolute nature of our linear terms seems to escape the attention of most people where they think they can apply terms such as seconds and meters in attempting to determine the age and size of universe.Of course such terms are very handy and seemingly adequate for the purposes of trade and commerce, but to apply these same terms in attempting to discern the age and or size of universe is an impossible task.

How so?  Because no two seconds are of the same absolute duration nor are any two meters of the same absolute length, which means that each and every second is of a slightly different duration and every meter is of a slightly different length.On top of this we are confronted with a dynamic universe which is continuously expanding at an accelerative rate of expansion.

Oh boy, don’t we have fun.   And many honestly believe the speed of light remains constant for periods measured in millions and billions of years, whereby it might be possible to determine the age and size of universe based on the constancy of light speed.

Here we come to another basic problem, as it is also assumed that light is in fact in linear motion much like a train or bus. Therefore light speed is determined on the basis of the duration of time it takes light to travel one meter, which is 1/299,792,458ths of a second.

But this particular speed of light is a fixed measure due to the uncertainty regarding the exact speed of light. It would seem that the speed of light was not very cooperative in assuring all concerned that the speed was in fact constant, as it kept changing.

To put an end to any confusion or misunderstanding it was agreed that the exact speed of light would be fixed at exactly 299,792,458 meters per second regardless of any further considerations.

It is also believed by most that time remains constant regardless of your position in space whereby it might be possible for the speed of light to be constant across the breadth and depth of universe.

How this should be possible in respect to a dynamic condition of universe is difficult to fathom, but that is the position taken by most scientists.So what we end up with is a tidy figure representing the age and the size of universe but having no corresponding relationship to the actual age or size of the universe, which begs one to ask why this should be tolerated. After all it is science isn’t it? Or is it?

If no two seconds are of the same absolute duration and no two meters are of the same absolute length and the size of universe keeps changing along with the value of time how should it be possible to determine the age and size of universe on the basis of seconds and meters?It’s simply not possible.The idea of the universe being so many years old and having a radius of so many light years is in fact a bogus concept devoid of any scientific value or merit.