A four hour show on time control technology, which was and is extremely interesting, but not quite what I expected.  So on one hand I was a bit disappointed, yet on the other hand I was excited to hear Dr. Anderson talking about the control of time.

Yes, he can manipulate time in what he claims to be a controlled manner, but he does not appear to understand the principles involved in respect to the dynamic nature of time itself.

Time is a flow of energy, where a slowing of time’s acceleration reduces the available energy and an increase in time’s acceleration increases the available energy relative to the system being controlled.

It would appear Dr. Anderson has not quite got the basic idea nailed down as he makes reference to a space time warp, which suggests a distortional effect.  But this is not time control in the sense of that which is being suggested, keeping in mind that he assures Art Bell and the listening audience that he has developed time control technology just as some suggest having developed gravity control technology, but it is not that.

I suppose this is along the line of the idea; if it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck it must be a duck.

In my view this is a case of the scientist getting a little bit out of touch with the natural world around them, as nature provides many examples of time field differentials.  Such an example is the accelerated growth of plants grown deep underground in horticultural nurseries where a 300 & 400% increase in the rate of growth has been documented, plus an increase in resistance to various plant diseases once transplanted to surface sites.

In this example there is no distortional effect but a uniform increase in the rate of growth due to an increase in the acceleration of time itself.

Again it is necessary to emphasize the non-linear nature of time and the need to re-evaluate the existing concept of a space/time continuum, which is generally viewed in terms of a linear relationship.  If we are to move forward it is critical to have the basic principles clearly fixed in our minds otherwise we are placing ourselves at a distinct disadvantage.

Here at GC the Gwandau team are attempting to develop a method by which to measure the acceleration of time and the inherent increase in energy associated with that acceleration.  Not an easy task, but one worth pursuing.

We also have the book Unity which explains the basic principles involved in the context of a time field continuance.

I wish Dr. Anderson all the best with his research and remain ever hopeful that there is indeed light at the end of the tunnel.

Much of our modern science is based on our assumed understanding of light speed, in relation to our perception of light being capable of moving from here to there in a manner similar to a train or bus.

This assumption leads us to believe that light travels across the universe at the speed of light.

In this respect we observe the universe expanding at an accelerating rate of expansion, where we have observed the perimeter of the visible universe to be expanding at or very close to the speed of light.

If the visible outer boundary of universe is expanding at the speed of light it would be impossible for our scientists to observe that expansion, as the observed light of such distant galaxies would never reach us.

On the other hand…if the universe, the observable universe, exists in a simultaneous state it is completely unneccessary for light to be in motion or to have an actual speed.  And this would seem to be the case.

We have convinced ourselves it should be possible to evaluate a dynamic universe on the basis of static terms which we employ to determine the speed of light being the time light takes to travel a distance of one meter in a vacuum…which is 1/299,792,458ths of a second.

And from this we determine the size and age of universe on the basis of light traveling at a constant rate of speed over the course of billions of years.

This would be a laughable situation if it were not quite so serious, but here we are in the 21st century still clinging to our out dated quaint ideas of a universe structured and functioning on the basis of our existing economy, in relation to those values employed for the purpose of trade and commerce.

The constancy of light speed is based on the universe existing in a static state, while the speed of light is determined on the basis of a linear perception of space and time.

Is it any wonder we are having a problem finding viable solutions to the energy crisis when we approach the natural order of universe from a contrary point of view?

How we think the universe should work and how it actually functions are two different things, but it appears there is little interest or desire to apply a bit of basic logic to the problem.

It is time to re-evaluate our perception of universe and the basic assumptions of science.  It is impossible for light to be in linear motion in the manner of a train or bus…or a rocket for that matter.  Light itself does not move in a linear manner nor can light be regulated by a speed limit determined by the apparent motion of light itself.

Science must be based on something more than smoke and mirrors, yet the basis of our modern physics is based on a slight of hand demonstration.  Because there is a slight delay in light observed in a series of mirrors that time gap is assumed to allow for the determination of speed, as in meters per second etc.

Only on the basis of a static universe should such a thing be possible and even then it would be impossible as a static universe would be unchanging and nothing would happen.

Employing static terms to define the form and function of universe is not very helpful.  But taking it one step further and determining light to be in linear motion is crippling our ability to formulate a viable energy program capable of driving the world’s economy.

We have no idea how old the universe might be and we have no idea how big or vast the universe might be, yet we appear certain to accept our assumptions as facts.

It is time to stop assuming and get on with the job of getting it right.

Rife was silenced and sent to his grave a broken man only because he found a simple sure fire way to treat illness and disease.

Still the various cancer agencies and associations ask us to donate money for the purpose of research intent on finding a cure for cancer.

Where are the regulatory bodies who police the medical field?

A cure has been or was available in 1934 and clynically proven to be extremely effective in curing cancer.

Why is it necessary to spend billions more on research which ignores a proven cure.

I must conclude that deception rules at high levels and there is no intention of finding an effective cure, but rather to keep the donkey chasing after the carrot.

Unfortunately most people don’t want to believe something so cruel could happen in America, Canada or the UK, but happen it did whether we like it or not.

Rife was a celebrated scientist who achieved great things which should have benefited everyone, but his achievements were too big to be allowed.

How and why do such crimes go unpunished?

Why is his work still ignored, despite clinical proof supporting a 100% cure rate?

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/10/091015085916.htm

There you have it folks, another win win for Project Unity.

Thanks to Jack Harris an associate professor at Yale the persistent current occurring in tiny metal rings has finally been measured in a definitive manner.

This persistent current is a dynamic response to an underlying force of energy responsible for the form and function of all physical structure.

And in that the underlying force of energy is nothing less than the mysterious aether energy which has been denied for so many years we now have verifiable proof of its existence,   Therefore free energy is not simply a fringe theory, but a true and verifiable reality.

One single force sustaining and perpetuating the existence of universe.

And in that tiny metal rings are employed in this experiment, the circular path should be considered in terms of a continuous field function, much like electrons forming circular paths around the nucleus of the atom.

Every atomic constituent of these metal rings is involved in the process of providing persistent current.  It is not only the dynamic relationship existing between each atomic constituent which provides for this persistent electrical current but the circular path the current is allowed to follow.

This would suggest that circular pathways in the form of a vortex cone may very well provide a multiple increase in the available current in a manner conforming to Project Unity.

If this doesn’t lift the veil of mystery surrounding free energy nothing will.

The time has come for a giant leap forward, let the scientific revolution begin.