It’s over a year ago now that we were first speaking of the disappearance of bees.
Our conclusion at that time although inconclusive was that, the mobile phones in America are one frequency and the rest of the world other frequencies. Following this line of reasoning, if American bees were disappearing it was because the mobile phone frequency in America was making bees lose their way. They would leave their nests in the morning but later couldn’t find their way back due to interference from mobile phones, North American mobile phones of a certain frequency.
Here’s a study that supports the idea that mobile phones contribute to the loss of bees.
Britain has seen a 15 per cent decline in its bee population in the last two yearsPhoto: ALAMY
Their disappearance has caused alarm throughout Europe and North America where campaigners have blamed agricultural pesticides, climate change and the advent of genetically modified crops for what is now known as ‘colony collapse disorder.’ Britain has seen a 15 per cent decline in its bee population in the last two years and shrinking numbers has led to a rise in thefts of hives.
Now researchers from Chandigarh’s Punjab University claim they have found the cause which could be the first step in reversing the decline: They have established that radiation from mobile telephones is a key factor in the phenomenon and say that it probably interfering with the bee’s navigation senses.
They set up a controlled experiment in Punjab earlier this year comparing the behaviour and productivity of bees in two hives – one fitted with two mobile telephones which were powered on for two fifteen minute sessions per day for three months. The other had dummy models installed.
After three months the researchers recorded a dramatic decline in the size of the hive fitted with the mobile phon, a significant reduction in the number of eggs laid by the queen bee. The bees also stopped producing honey.
The queen bee in the “mobile” hive produced fewer than half of those created by her counterpart in the normal hive.
They also found a dramatic decline in the number of worker bees returning to the hive after collecting pollen. Because of this the amount of nectar produced in the hive also shrank.
Ved Prakash Sharma and Neelima Kumar, the authors of the report in the journal Current Science, wrote: “Increase in the usage of electronic gadgets has led to electropollution of the environment. Honeybee behaviour and biology has been affected by electrosmog since these insects have magnetite in their bodies which helps them in navigation.
“There are reports of sudden disappearance of bee populations from honeybee colonies. The reason is still not clear. We have compared the performance of honeybees in cellphone radiation exposed and unexposed colonies.
“A significant decline in colony strength and in the egg laying rate of the queen was observed. The behaviour of exposed foragers was negatively influenced by the exposure, there was neither honey nor pollen in the colony at the end of the experiment.”
Tim Lovett, of the British Beekeepers Association, said that hives have been successful in London where there was high mobile phone use.
“Previous work in this area has indicated this [mobile phone use] is not a real factor,” he said. “If new data comes along we will look at it.”
He said: “At the moment we think is more likely to be a combination of factors including disease, pesticides and habitat loss.”
The UK Government has set aside £10 million for research into the decline of pollinators like bees, but the BBKA claim much more money is needed for research into the problem, including studies on pesticides, disease and new technology like mobile phones.
According to the University of Durham, England’s bees are vanishing faster than anywhere else in Europe, with more than half of hives
dying out over the last 20 years.
The most recent statistics from last winter show that the decline in honey bees in Britain is slowing, with just one in six hives lost.
This is still above the natural rate of ten per cent losses, but a vast improvement on previous years.
There has been an increase in the number of thefts of hives across the world and in Germany beekeepers have started fitting GPS tracking devices to their hives.
Our existing perception of gravity allows gravity to continue increasing from the Earth’s surface to the center of the core.
Unfortunately this perception does not allow for a balanced stable planetary structure.
It has long been my contention that the planet has both internal dynamics and external dynamics which function in an inverse manner whereby gravity not only increases from the depths of space to the surface of the Earth but also increases from the center of the core to the surface of the Earth.
Of course this is not readily evident as any open hole, valley or dent extends the external dynamics inward, which gives us the impression of gravity increasing from the surface to the center of the core.
But in recent years it has been discovered that gravity at the tops of mountains situated above sea level is higher than at the base, Also gravity is higher over the deepest portions of the ocean.
No one seems to have an adequate explanation for this situation, but it’s quite straight forward. The high gravity well over the ocean is due to the external dynamics extending to the bottom of the ocean, while the gravity well at the top of mountains is due to the internal dynamics being extended up through the inside of the mountain.
This in turn allows for a relatively balanced stable structure.
Water flows up through the geological structure of the earth and flows down from the mountains to the sea.
In relation to the disaster unfolding in the Gulf of Mexico crude oil is being discharged into the ocean from an oil deposit located 2200 feet beneath the sea bed.
The continuous flow of oil is said to be due to pressure from below, but no mechanical pressure is acting upon the oil deposit, it is simply gravitational acceleration causing the oil to flow up the drill hole to the sea bed.
If the drilling of this hole had not encountered a liquid or gaseous mix the drilling process would have simply extended the external dynamics down the hole, but because it did encounter a liquid mixed with gas the internal dynamics were allowed to extend upward to the sea bed.
Now two more holes are being drilled with the intention of intersecting with the existing hole to relieve the perceived pressure which is believed to be forcing the oil up the original hole to the sea bed.
It is the extended depth of the drill hole which is providing a runway for gravitational acceleration to propel the oil upward. What will be the result of two additional holes? Will they neutralize the perceived pressure or will they merely allow for a further discharge of oil into the Gulf of Mexico?
The oil deposit is part and parcel of the geology constituting the gulf, but because it is in the form of a liquid it is driven upward by gravity associated with the Earth’s intenal dynamics.
It is my opinion that a conventional explosive should be employed to seal the hole and prevent the discharge of anymore oil into the gulf.
This of course will damage the drill hole, which could prevent BP from extracting oil from this well in the future, but the dischage of oil into the gulf must be stopped and the sooner the better.
BP seems very confident that the two new drill holes will in fact stop the flow of oil into the gulf, but I would caution that BP engineers are basing their confidence on the two new holes relieving pressure, while at the same time giving no thought to the possibility of there being both internal and external dynamics involved, not to mention gravitational acceleration allowing for the flow of oil to the surface of the sea bed.
The pipe that extends from the sea bed to the oil deposit 2200 feet below has an inside diameter of 21 inches, which is a lot bigger than the small pipe we have been watching for some days.
It has been estimated that the flow from the main pipe discharging oil into the gulf might be as much as 120,000 barrels per day.
There is something very wrong with what we have been told to date, as it now appears that we have been kept in the dark. They show us the mouse but fail to show us the elephant standing in the shadows.
It is time for the military to take control of the situation a put a conventional explosive devise down the pipe in the hope of causing a blockage. Explosives are used to stop a blow out on the surface and this is a blow out at the bottom of the gulf 5,000 feet below the surface.
The damage that has been done and the damage that will occur if this is not stopped cannot be measured in dollars. This is a disaster of unfathomable proportions and it can only get worse the longer it is allowed to continue.
I personally want the oil industry to wake up and get the science straight. Gravitational acceleration is driving the oil up the pipe to the sea bed and discharging it into the gulf. There is no mechanical pressure being applied to the oil deposit, it is simply the internal dynamics of the earth acting in sync with the external dynamics of the earth. Both the internal and external dynamics function in an inverse relationship which allows for the earth to remain structurally stable.
Read the free book Unity on this web site if you want to understand what I am talking about.
The 2200 feet of pipe allow for a significant increase in gravitational accleration, which is why the oil keeps flooding into the gulf. If it is not stopped it will simply continue to pour more oil into the gulf until the well runs virtually dry.
What you can see from a fly over is a drop in the bucket compared to what is hiding below the surface of the ocean. Divers have been down to 25 feet to have a look and they were shocked by what they saw, there is a lot of oil in the water…not on the water but in the water below the surface.
Experts are telling us the effects of this are going to be with us for decades.
If the estimates some are suggesting are correct there is already 4,200,000 barrels of oil polluting the Gulf of Mexico, numbers which can only increase as long as the oil continues to flow.
Mr. President, it is time to call in the navy to deal with this.
As the last hours of Top Kill on the oil in the gulf slip by, here is a compressed documentary from the History Channel concerning another and even larger? disaster, that of what happens on December 21st, 2012.
It’s been a month now and the oil keeps gushing into the Gulf of Mexico with no assurance of a solution in sight.
How much oil? BP says 5,000 barrels a day, but independent estimates range all the way up to 95,000 barrels a day, which is a lot of oil and a whole lot more than the 5,000 barrels given out as the official figure.
Most of the oil is not floating on the surface where it would be visible for all to see, as most of it is floating beneath the surface in ribbons up to 10 miles long and 300 feet thick.
This is a disaster, a full blown disaster which may well become a disaster of global proportions if an effective method to stop the flow of oil is not found soon.
At the present time two new holes are being drilled which will intersect the problematic deposit, but these will not be completed until August. It is hoped that these new holes will relieve the existing pressure of the leaking deposit and allow the well to be sealed.
However, if this does not work the way the experts believe it should work this disaster will be beyond presently imagined proportions. In such a case the Atlantic will be at risk. But beyond the limits of ocean tides this toxic brew will affect human health for decades to come, keeping in mind that the leaking oil is nothing less than poison to all life forms on this planet.
Consequently this is more than just a worrying situation, it is an international emergency which requires immediate attention and resolve to limit the extent of the disaster.
Let’s not be naive, the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico is already a catastrophy and if an effective method is not found very soon to stop the flow of oil into the gulf there are no words to describe the potential consequences.
The oil experts agree that the leaking deposit is under intense pressure, which many feel may have been the cause of the problem from the start. But there is no mechanical pressure being applied to the oil deposit. A small drill hole was bored 2200 feet into the sea bed to reach the deposit and when the deposit was punctured by the drill; gas and oil was forced up the pipe to the drill rig at sea level, some 5,000 feet above the sea bed.
Here at Gravity Control we deal with issues concerning gravity and it is our contention that the internal gravity of the earth is inversely proportional to the gravity affecting the external portion of the planet.
This provides a balanced condition whereby the earth remains structurally stable. Gravity increases from the core to the surface just as it increase from space to the surface.
If we dig an open hole in the earth’s surface the external dynamics of the planet are simply extended inward, but in the case of this small drill hole encountering a liquid and gaseous mixture the internal dynamics are extended up the pipe whereby driving the gas and oil to the surface of the sea bed. And as long as the hole remains filled by gas and oil the flow will continue to the surface of the sea bed.
Hoping to plug the hole with golf balls, rope and mud may not work as the upward gravitational acceleration is equal to the gravitational acceleration in the external portion of the planet.
The 2200 foot hole represents a significant distance in terms of gravitational acceleration, which can be visualized being proportional to a drop from 2200 feet above the earth’s surface.
If BP is faced with the task of working against gravity to plug the leak existing plan B, C, D, E, F and G might not work as antisipated.
We can only hope and pray that a solution can be found.
It is likely the two new drill holes will in fact intersect the existing drill hole, but will this make things better or worse? I do not believe anyone knows the answer to that very important question.
If this leak keeps pouring oil at the rates suggested until August and then increases due to the existence of 3 holes instead of just one there will be no known method by which to stop the leak until the deposit runs close to dry.
This is a critical situation for all of us, it has to be stopped.
Perhaps this is not the best time to suggest alternate energy sources, but alternate energy has been available for a long time. To date the oil cartel runs the show, due to the existing power of money. But what has money to do with it when the environment and the planet’s life sustaining ecology is being threatened by a very real and present danger.
I think it’s time for an alternate Plan B to be put into action, we don’t need oil as much as we need an environment capable of sustaining life on our planet and right now it’s the only one we have.
Finding someone to blame for the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico is of little consequence if we can’t find a method by which to stop the flow of oil into the gulf.
Attempting to plug a leak 5,000 feet beneath the sea is not an easy task at the best of times and this certainly is not the best of times.
