Comments on: Boeing’s Mike Gamble – Study of Gravity 2 http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2010/03/11/boeings-mike-gamble-study-of-gravity-2/ Renewable Energy and Green Ideas Sun, 05 Sep 2010 20:25:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: David http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2010/03/11/boeings-mike-gamble-study-of-gravity-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9145 David Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:16:05 +0000 http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/?p=1048#comment-9145 Thanks for clarifying that Mike. All technology information must be cleared through Boeing.....aha! I get the picture, thanks. Thanks for clarifying that Mike.

All technology information must be cleared through Boeing…..aha! I get the picture, thanks.

]]> By: Mike Gamble http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2010/03/11/boeings-mike-gamble-study-of-gravity-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9143 Mike Gamble Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:13:19 +0000 http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/?p=1048#comment-9143 David Would like to comment on your second paragraph about my proposed "Warp Drive". The engine would run at a velocity of .8c-.9c, but the machine would only go about half of that aprox .4c-.5c assuming you could convert half that velocity to thrust. I agree that to get a machine up to .9c the power numbers go astronomical. But, if you back those numbers down around the knee of the curve they should be do able. The biggest restriction I have to deal with is that all technology information must be cleared through the Boeing release system. Thanks for publishing it. Mike David
Would like to comment on your second paragraph about my proposed “Warp Drive”. The engine would run at a velocity of .8c-.9c, but the machine would only go about half of that aprox .4c-.5c assuming you could convert half that velocity to thrust. I agree that to get a machine up to .9c the power numbers go astronomical. But, if you back those numbers down around the knee of the curve they should be do able.
The biggest restriction I have to deal with is that all technology information must be cleared through the Boeing release system.

Thanks for publishing it.
Mike

]]> By: david http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2010/03/11/boeings-mike-gamble-study-of-gravity-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9141 david Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:20:23 +0000 http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/?p=1048#comment-9141 Thanks Mike, that is absolutely amazing and very much appreciated. I have to ask though...have you considered project unity as shown here on this site as a contender or as a possible application of this amazing knowledge? I do not believe it is possible to get a craft up to 0.9c no matter how hard we try. The ratio of mass to energy is going to be extreme, in relation to the greater mass having a lower ratio of energy per unit of mass. During the late 50s and into the 60s the Douglas Aircraft Company did a lot of work attempting to understand the technology driving UFO saucer type craft. The study finally came to an end by concluding a whole new physics was required before any real progress could be made in duplicating such out of this world technology. They were at the time paying unpublicized contacts to tell them all they could about these craft and in reading some of this material they collected it would seem at least one guy was giving them the straight goods, but unfortunately it seems to have gone over their heads, at least that's my take on it. Are you in anyway restricted in the method of application...as in; it has to fit a known process of operation? Many thanks Mike, you are one very smart guy who is contributing a great deal to the effort. David Thanks Mike, that is absolutely amazing and very much appreciated.

I have to ask though…have you considered project unity as shown here on this site as a contender or as a possible application of this amazing knowledge?

I do not believe it is possible to get a craft up to 0.9c no matter how hard we try. The ratio of mass to energy is going to be extreme, in relation to the greater mass having a lower ratio of energy per unit of mass.

During the late 50s and into the 60s the Douglas Aircraft Company did a lot of work attempting to understand the technology driving UFO saucer type craft. The study finally came to an end by concluding a whole new physics was required before any real progress could be made in duplicating such out of this world technology.

They were at the time paying unpublicized contacts to tell them all they could about these craft and in reading some of this material they collected it would seem at least one guy was giving them the straight goods, but unfortunately it seems to have gone over their heads, at least that’s my take on it.

Are you in anyway restricted in the method of application…as in; it has to fit a known process of operation?

Many thanks Mike, you are one very smart guy who is contributing a great deal to the effort.

David

]]>