Comments on: The Casing Theory http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2009/12/05/the-casing-theory-2/ Renewable Energy and Green Ideas Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:33:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: gwandauteam http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2009/12/05/the-casing-theory-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9654 gwandauteam Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:00:07 +0000 http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/?p=906#comment-9654 "Dr." David Chester, I really don't know your reason for posting that gibberish. If you were the scientifically schooled man you seemingly try to appear as, you would never attempt to criticize a theory based on an outlook not even close to contemporary science. If the reason is to make fun of our work,you are unfortunately not succeeding, since the ones understanding the Unity dynamics regard conventional science as a primitive and by far inferior level of interpreting the dynamics of our universe. Welcome to a new understanding of the dynamics of a holistic universe, or creep back under the piece of rock from which you came forth. Gwandau “Dr.” David Chester,

I really don’t know your reason for posting that gibberish.

If you were the scientifically schooled man you seemingly try to appear as, you would never attempt to criticize a theory based on an outlook not even close to contemporary science.

If the reason is to make fun of our work,you are unfortunately not succeeding, since the ones
understanding the Unity dynamics regard conventional science as a primitive and by far inferior level of interpreting the dynamics of our universe.

Welcome to a new understanding of the dynamics of a holistic universe, or creep back under the piece of rock from which you came forth.

Gwandau

]]> By: David Chester http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2009/12/05/the-casing-theory-2/comment-page-1/#comment-9630 David Chester Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:57:54 +0000 http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/?p=906#comment-9630 The "Casing Theory" is completly wrong becouse the non-Gaussianity of the curvature perturbation generated by ekpyrotic collapse with multiple fields. The transition from the multi-field scaling solution to a single-field dominated regime converts initial isocurvature field perturbations to an almost scale-invariant comoving curvature perturbation. In the specific model of , $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$, with exponential potentials, $-V_i \exp (-c_i \phi_i)$, we calculate the bispectrum of the resulting curvature perturbation. We find that the non-Gaussianity is dominated by non-linear on small scales and hence is of the local form. The non-linear parameter of the curvature perturbation is given by $f_{NL} = 5 c_j^2 /12$, where $c_j$ is the exponent of the potential for the field which becomes sub-dominant at late times. Since $c_j^2$ must be large, in order to generate an almost scale invariant spectrum, the non-Gaussianity is inevitably large. The present constraints on $f_{\rm NL}$ and the scalar spectral index. Dr. David Chester The “Casing Theory” is completly wrong becouse the non-Gaussianity of the curvature perturbation generated by ekpyrotic collapse with multiple fields. The transition from the multi-field scaling solution to a single-field dominated regime converts initial isocurvature field perturbations to an almost scale-invariant comoving curvature perturbation. In the specific model of , $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$, with exponential potentials, $-V_i \exp (-c_i \phi_i)$, we calculate the bispectrum of the resulting curvature perturbation. We find that the non-Gaussianity is dominated by non-linear on small scales and hence is of the local form. The non-linear parameter of the curvature perturbation is given by $f_{NL} = 5 c_j^2 /12$, where $c_j$ is the exponent of the potential for the field which becomes sub-dominant at late times. Since $c_j^2$ must be large, in order to generate an almost scale invariant spectrum, the non-Gaussianity is inevitably large. The present constraints on $f_{\rm NL}$ and the scalar spectral index.

Dr. David Chester

]]> By: Jim http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2009/12/05/the-casing-theory-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8919 Jim Mon, 14 Dec 2009 12:46:30 +0000 http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/?p=906#comment-8919 Frank et al, Apologies re the formating. It's just text and if further interest is generated, please see http://www.gravitycontrol.org/forum/index.php?topic=328.0 Frank et al,
Apologies re the formating.
It’s just text and if further interest is generated, please see
http://www.gravitycontrol.org/forum/index.php?topic=328.0

]]> By: Frank http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2009/12/05/the-casing-theory-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8917 Frank Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:53:47 +0000 http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/?p=906#comment-8917 Whats up with the formatting? Whats up with the formatting?

]]> By: Jim http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2009/12/05/the-casing-theory-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8916 Jim Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:43:20 +0000 http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/?p=906#comment-8916 The main reason for posting the text only was for those who love words only without the distraction of pictures. Two points of view here, one, don't distract me with diagrams, and two, the paper is enhanced by artful illustrative forces. I like them both. And in either case, it's a wonderful job well done. The main reason for posting the text only was for those who love words only without the distraction of pictures.
Two points of view here,
one, don’t distract me with diagrams,
and two, the paper is enhanced by artful illustrative forces. I like them both. And in either case, it’s a wonderful job well done.

]]>