It would seem a lot of people want nuclear power plants built in America in order to supply them with very expensive electricity.
Greens seem to think this is the right thing to do because they believe nuclear power plants do not pollute the environment.
The fuel for nuclear power plants is uranium and uranium is a mineral which has to be dug out of the ground and refined into a usable product.
That does not sound good for the miners or those working in the refineries, not to mention those who produce the bundles of fuel rods.
Then we have the problem of disposing of all that nuclear waste material. At the present time we have lots of ideas, but after billions have been spent there is still no known method by which to safely dispose of nuclear waste materials.
Of course we could go with solar power, which is a whole lot safer and much cheaper.
But what the hell, nuclear power is modern eh?
The biggest blunder we ever made and if you check the history books you will find that the push for nuclear power plants was a push to demonstrate that there really had to be a peaceful use for nukes.
It’s safe they say, not one person has died due to exposure to a nuclear power plant in America.
That is nothing less than propaganda, it’s utter rubbish.
It is almost next to impossible to prove beyond a doubt a direct link between nuclear power plants and cancer because it takes 10 to 20 years to develop.
Yet, the rate of cancer in America is climbing and is now near epidemic proportions and one of the major causes of death and in some areas it is the leading cause of death above all else.
Must be from people smoking eh?
Ever notice those clauses about no liability related to nuclear pollution, which means no one is to blame and no one is to be held accountable.
So, are nukes green or considered green, it would seem so. But how many of those greens have the faintest idea what it’s really all about?
Uranium is not a high energy element, it has an extremely low ratio of energy to mass, in relation to its ratio of energy per unit of mass.
And nuclear power plants supply no actual energy, the most inefficient way to heat water known, but what the heck what’s efficiency got to do with it anyway.
There are many different ways to power our global industry and any one of them is a better choice than a nuclear power plant.
4 comments ↓
I prefer your idea of tapping the aether.
The aether drives the entire universe, it drives our solar system and supports every existing atomic structure, which is no small thing.
Using the aether we can modulate an energy differential in a controlled fashion to produce all the electricity we could ever use, with no pollution of any kind.
Plus there is no consumption of fuel in any form, what more could you ask for?
Yet, the greens agree to spending 3 billion for inefficient nuclear power.
The pollution from the nuclear industry is invisible, tasteless and odorless…….but that does not mean it isn’t there polluting the environment, because it most certainly is polluting.
For a school project, we need to answer: 4 ways that miners can safely dispose of their hazardous waste. Do you know 4 ways????
Thank you.
Hi Dina,
Sorry for the delay in my return but it’s because we don’t deal with toxic waste and basically don’t know how to get rid of it.
First I wondered if you might have thought, if we’re supposed to know how to do gravity control we should know how to get rid of toxic waste, is that right?
Here at gravitycontrol.org we are working on using gravity as a propulsive force and since gravity has no speed being either on or off it means we also wonder about things like time travel. If you can zap from here to there in no time, then you have travelled through time to get to your destination. Otherwise it might take a million years in an ordinary rocket.
The exciting new frontier is time and space. Go anywhere any time. Wow, sounds dangerous, scary yet maybe fun. Sometimes a lone figure like Nikola Tesla has a better way. Tesla is the guy who gave the world electricity. Gallileo gave the world insight as to where in the sky we really are. All you had to do was look thru his telescope and figure it out. The earth revolved around the sun, not the other way around.
I wish I could offer more on the toxic waste problem but I can say this. If we adopt electric cars instead of gas, electric trains instead of diesel, electric planes, etc., whatever runs on gas today. If we do that we will get rid of lots of toxic waste in the air because there will be no emissions from the vehicles electric.
Next, the electric coal plants and nuclear plants. Magnets will help make them toxic free too.
Our goal of course is gravity control and I thought when the internet was born, I’d have the problem solved in a couple weeks. That was eight years ago and we’ve learned a lot.
Our way of progression to the success of GC is not like anything else. It is not zap and spin. It’s focus.
Since our website is now eight years old it’s going to take you a while to traverse if you want to have a look. But to cut to the chase, check out Project Unity. Sorry, it’s not what you know from school. It’s an alternative view of the universe that says we are all powered by an underlying force, used to be called the aether, that powers the universe. Call it God or whomever, this underlying force is our free energy for the taking, if only we can understand it. And we do and we will understand more as our time line continues.
Not four ways to rid the earth of toxic substances but more like, how to rid the world of creating these toxic substances in the first place.
With the introduction of non polluting devices.
As we continue to live in interesting times, may we be blessed by less combustion and fewer explosions in favor of electricity and magnetism and gravity control.
Thank you for asking.
All the best to you kids. May your wishes come true.
Jim
James B. Nicholson
http://www.gravitycontrol.org