Entries from September 2009 ↓
September 28th, 2009 — Uncategorized
New Car Battery
The Chevy Volt will apparently run for only about thirty minutes on battery power. About 40 miles they say. The EV1 used to get four times that run on straight battery power. Why General Motors destroyed the EV1 still has people guessing. The film, Who Killed the Electric Car, helps you to understand.
On the technology of lead acid batteries China offers many electric cars including a five passenger sedan that travels 500k on one charge with a top speed of 120k. The Tesla, with its sandwich of five thousand mobile phone batteries is much faster, lighter and can attain a similar or better performance.
The electric car is a bit stalled due to current battery technology. You read about all these wonder batteries but where are they. It would seem that our electric car industry needs those new batteries in a big way. Not on the market yet, the future line of batteries look like they’ll be most helpful in promoting electric cars. This article gives you a hint of the direction of battery technology. better battery
New battery technology is destined to catch up with the electric car. It’s obviously the near future of transport and of course, power. Beyond that is the Watson Magnet Motor which will keep the battery charged on the go thus never requiring an overnight plugin. This is where the battery does the work and the magnet motor works to keep the battery charged up. When this most beautiful synergy is in place we will breathe easier because by then, trains (we already have maglev), boats, planes and cars will have found a way to generate power that doesn’t involve combustion. We should have been onto this a hundred years ago but back then, who knew that combustion would lead us to our current situation.
Later when the Unity system of gravity control is launched we’ll still need a good battery. And with the leaps and bounds of new battery technology, by then that battery should be pretty good.
September 20th, 2009 — Uncategorized
It would seem a lot of people want nuclear power plants built in America in order to supply them with very expensive electricity.
Greens seem to think this is the right thing to do because they believe nuclear power plants do not pollute the environment.
The fuel for nuclear power plants is uranium and uranium is a mineral which has to be dug out of the ground and refined into a usable product.
That does not sound good for the miners or those working in the refineries, not to mention those who produce the bundles of fuel rods.
Then we have the problem of disposing of all that nuclear waste material. At the present time we have lots of ideas, but after billions have been spent there is still no known method by which to safely dispose of nuclear waste materials.
Of course we could go with solar power, which is a whole lot safer and much cheaper.
But what the hell, nuclear power is modern eh?
The biggest blunder we ever made and if you check the history books you will find that the push for nuclear power plants was a push to demonstrate that there really had to be a peaceful use for nukes.
It’s safe they say, not one person has died due to exposure to a nuclear power plant in America.
That is nothing less than propaganda, it’s utter rubbish.
It is almost next to impossible to prove beyond a doubt a direct link between nuclear power plants and cancer because it takes 10 to 20 years to develop.
Yet, the rate of cancer in America is climbing and is now near epidemic proportions and one of the major causes of death and in some areas it is the leading cause of death above all else.
Must be from people smoking eh?
Ever notice those clauses about no liability related to nuclear pollution, which means no one is to blame and no one is to be held accountable.
So, are nukes green or considered green, it would seem so. But how many of those greens have the faintest idea what it’s really all about?
Uranium is not a high energy element, it has an extremely low ratio of energy to mass, in relation to its ratio of energy per unit of mass.
And nuclear power plants supply no actual energy, the most inefficient way to heat water known, but what the heck what’s efficiency got to do with it anyway.
There are many different ways to power our global industry and any one of them is a better choice than a nuclear power plant.
September 20th, 2009 — Uncategorized
As you know, free energy is not free. Someone must build something to receive it. Kinda like free wifi. If you don’t have a computer with you, do you really care.
For those who want to follow up on free energy and who’s done what, this link will be of interest
free energy update
About the only two things missing from the above are W. David Barclay’s Unity and Charles Watson’s Magnet Motor. The WMM is poised for near stardom while the Unity device will allow for our dreams of traveling the universe as we know it and more. This is wonderfully compelling stuff but for those who missed it, the above is a worthy read.
September 9th, 2009 — Uncategorized
In reporting of these green energies of the world it is satisfying to note that many people are aware of pollution and global warming and are prepared to offer their time and labor to the cause. The known green energies are solar, wind, river current, waves and….the aether. The Michelson Morley experiment to detect the aether was without success which caused this underlying force of nature to disappear from modern science until quantum thought emerged and took hold. Sadly, only a small group of people seem to know of the aether and even fewer understand that it is the greenest energy in the universe. Of the world’s green energy people you might not be surprised that no new energy projects include tapping the aether. Not surprising since the multitudes of Greenies have absolutely no knowledge of harnessing the aether for all energy needs. The mere thought of going off on a tangent like that gets their collective back up and they counter with, we know nothing of that so how can we possibly entertain it.
The only true and reliable green energy is the aether. When we get it together the world will change in such a way we will laugh at our ignorance like chuckling over yesterday’s style. But until then we are stuck with combustion, rockets and other explosions as a way of life.
So spread the word on this most green of energies, the aether. It is an underlying force that supplies our very existence and it is a limitless supply of the greenest of energies for all our needs.
September 6th, 2009 — Uncategorized
Neil Armstrong’s Secret….
ON JULY 20, 1969, AS COMMANDER OF THE APOLLO 11 LUNAR MODULE, NEIL ARMSTRONG WAS THE FIRST PERSON TO SET FOOT ON THE MOON.
HIS FIRST WORDS AFTER STEPPING ON THE MOON, “THAT’S ONE SMALL STEP FOR MAN, ONE GIANT LEAP FOR MANKIND,” WERE TELEVISED TO EARTH AND HEARD BY MILLIONS.
BUT JUST BEFORE HE RE-ENTERED THE LANDER, HE MADE THE ENIGMATIC REMARK “GOOD LUCK, MR. GORSKY.”
MANY PEOPLE AT NASA THOUGH IT WAS A CASUAL REMARK CONCERNING SOME RIVAL SOVIET COSMONAUT.
HOWEVER, UPON CHECKING, THERE WAS NO GORSKY IN EITHER THE RUSSIAN OR AMERICAN SPACE PROGRAMS.
OVER THE YEARS MANY PEOPLE QUESTIONED ARMSTRONG AS TO WHAT THE “GOOD LUCK, MR. GORSKY” STATEMENT MEANT, BUT ARMSTRONG ALWAYS JUST SMILED.
ON JULY 5, 1995, IN TAMPA BAY , FLORIDA WHILE ANSWERING QUESTIONS FOLLOWING A SPEECH, A REPORTER BROUGHT UP THE 26-YEAR-OLD QUESTION TO ARMSTRONG. THIS TIME HE FINALLY RESPONDED.
MR. GORSKY HAD DIED, SO NEIL ARMSTRONG FELT HE COULD NOW ANSWER THE QUESTION.
IN 1938, WHEN HE WAS A KID IN A SMALL MID-WEST TOWN , HE WAS PLAYING BASEBALL WITH A FRIEND IN THE BACKYARD. HIS FRIEND HIT THE BALL, WHICH LANDED IN HIS NEIGHBOR’S YARD BY THEIR BEDROOM WINDOW.
HIS NEIGHBORS WERE MR. AND MRS.. GORSKY.
AS HE LEANED DOWN TO PICK UP THE BALL, YOUNG ARMSTRONG HEARD MRS. GORSKY SHOUTING AT MR. GORSKY:
“SEX! YOU WANT SEX?! YOU’LL GET SEX WHEN THE KID NEXT DOOR WALKS ON THE MOON!“
TRUE STORY
But of course the question remains, did he?
