http://www.voltairenet.org:80/article159381.html
It looks like gravity control is in the works, but appears to be limited to electrogravitic effects.
Boeing also looks like an eager contender wanting to apply gravity control.
But, here at www.gravitycontrol.org we have project unity which is way ahead of electrogravitic effects, such as those demonstrated by the B2 bomber.
So the question arises; are we here at gravitycontrol.org the cutting edge of gravity control?
It is an interesting possibility, eh?
8 comments ↓
Presidential directive opens door to release of anti-gravity technology.
Now, that is quite a statement……most dramatic.
Is it possible that we will actually learn what they know about gravity and gravity control?
As far as I know the Lorentz force (Lorentz-O) is the secret of the antigravity issue. With electricity you can affect the aether. You have a strong toroidal coil in the middle of it there is a tube with salt water. On the botton there is copper. From above you put cylindrical electrodes of electric arc welder. When you turn on the switch, you will see spin due to the DC current flow. Of cource to have antigravity you need another conductor that is perpendicular to the electrode. Both will try to line up, but if you don’t let them, the stress is transfered to the medium – antigravity ;)
Thanks Lubomir.
Have you had a look at our Project Unity at http://www.gravityconctrol.org
This is a magnet frame by which it is possible to focus the aether field of the craft, whereby you can achieve lift by a relative increase in field frequency, which in turn produces an electrical discharge or plasma effect.
I think Lubomir’s remarks appear to be quoting Stan Deyo’s lecture at (correct me if I’m wrong) the 2005 American Antigravity conference.
It wasn’t American Antigravity, it was a different conference.
Sorry, Bo, we weren’t speaking of americanantigravity.com but we’ love to know what’s happening there.
Your second email. It’s like we’re talking about different stuff? Maybe there’s been some weird cross connection.
Hey Jim,
I’m not sure if you are the same user as Lubomir. But I was pointing out that his comments were exactly the information given by Stan Deyo at a conference. I think it was one of the conferences by ancientofdays.net. Unfortunately, key information about gravity (from the lecture) was left out of his post. The ONLY person I’ve ever heard use the phrase “Lorentz-O” is Stan Deyo. Lubomir goes on to post that you need salt water in a cylinder or tube and gives other details and even mentions an arc welder which is exactly the information Stan Deyo used in his presentation. This was NOT a demonstration of antigravity. Just based on the post above, it confuses two unrelated theories while leaving out key information on both. But most importantly, credit was not given to the original author and that is why I felt the need to make my original post.
Thanks Bo