Michael Gamble from Boeing has kindly sent along his pitch notes for his gravity research presentation.
You can follow what Mike said during his presentation for perhaps a more concise view.
SPESIF PITCH NOTES 2/26/09
Chart 1) INTRODUCTION to the “STUDY OF GRAVITY”
Chart 1A) Boeing memo allowing the “Public Domain” release of this “Study of Gravity”.
[Not needed in presentation, but must be included with the charts for external release]
Chart 1B) Hello, my name is Mike Gamble, I am an electronics engineer for The Boeing Co. (Seattle). A week ago I had no idea that I would be here to present this study. Would like to thank the conference chair person for pulling the right strings. This presentation is from a different perspective more of a macroscopic overview. Enjoy the gravity presentation and let me know what you think about it. Do apologize for the MatLab type-Os and scaling issues there was no time to get them re-run and through document control.
A little HISTORY
I started this “Study of Gravity” back in 2007 more as a curiosity than research. Looking in textbooks all you find about gravity is the statement that it is an attraction between two bodies and varies as the mass and separation. I thought there must be more to it, so I started collecting data about the earth. In engineering you start with a ballpark number (WAG or SWAG) and work the problem from there. Being of the electronics type I was trained to think in terms of waves, harmonics and frequencies. The “wow moment” in the research came when I realized that the harmonic waveshapes were aligning very close to that of the measured data. After that things got real interesting!
Chart 2) Steps in my gravity research. These charts cover the first two bullets.
Chart 3) SECTION 1 GRAVITY DOCUMENTATION
The next charts cover what’s commonly known about the earth and gravity.
Chart 4) Starting with the basic definition of the earth’s gravity:
A radial field of acceleration with an average surface value of 32ft/ sec2.
a) X-Axis defined as “Equatorial”
b) Y-Axis defined as “Polar”
Chart 5) Moving further out, a diagram of the “Van Allen Radiation Belts” showing their size,
shape and location.
Chart 6) Moving further out, a diagram of “Geosync(hronous) Orbit” around the earth.
Chart 7) Moving further out, a diagram of earth’s magnetic shell the “Magnetosphere”
showing its location and earth’s high rate of movement.
SPESIF PITCH NOTES(cont) 2/26/09
Chart 8) SECTION 2 GRAVITY ANALYSIS
The analysis is divided into four parts:
Starting with short sections on:
a) Relevant Equations and
b) Wave Basics
Then the main section on:
c) Waveshape Generation
Followed by a short section on:
d) Tesla’s Measurements
Chart 9) The next three charts cover some “Relevant Equations” as they apply to
this “Study of Gravity”.
Chart 10) Newton’s famous equation for making things move.
Chart 11) The mathematical relationship between Acceleration, Velocity and Position.
Chart 12) The right hand electric motor rule:
Force is the “cross product” of the Electric and Magnetic fields.
Chart 13) The next four charts cover “Wave Basics” relevant to this study.
Chart 14) Textbook relationships of: Wavelength, Amplitude, Nodes and Peaks.
Chart 15) Textbook relationships of: Average, RMS(root mean square) and Peak
wave measurements as they apply to gravity data.
Chart 16) Textbook definition of the generation of Standing Waves.
Chart 17) Textbook definition of the generation of Polarized Waves.
Chart 18) The following charts show the proposed gravity waveshape details. The individual
components and the combined result in both the time and frequency domains.
Chart 19) Proposed waveshape for the generation of the donut shaped rings of the “Van Allen Belts” . Requires two (dipole) feedpoints in the Y-axis (polar) to generate nodes on the Y-axis
and a peak on the X-axis (equatorial).
Chart 20) Proposed waveshape for the generation of the “Magnetosphere” shell. Requires one
feedpoint at the center (origin) to generate a spherical shell in both the X and Y axis.
Chart 21) Shows the harmonic placements of the wavelengths for the Magnetosphere,
Geosync orbit and earth.
Chart 21A) Shows the details of the fundamental wavelength completely enclosing the planet
structure.
Chart 22) Shows the estimated Gravity frequencies and harmonics based on the given data.
Chart 23) Shows the harmonic frequency content of the “Van Allen Radiation belts”.
SPESIF PITCH NOTES(cont) 2/26/09
SECTION 2 WAVESHAPE GENERATION (cont)
Chart 24) Shows the three possible planet core types depending on the value of the gravity wave at
the center (origin) “+”plus, “-“minus and “0”zero.
Chart 25) The next two charts cover the Y-Axis (polar) proposed waveshape.
Chart 26) Shows the Y-Axis estimated waveshape based on the given data:
Three types of core centers (origin)
Big negative dip for the surface gravity
“S” curve at 1x lambda (geosync)
“S” curve at 2x lambda (magnetosphere) [off page – MatLab scaling]
(same shape as “geosync” but smaller)
Chart 27) Fourier analysis (frequency domain) of Y-axis (polar) estimated waveshape
shows three harmonics for all core types.
Chart 28) The next two charts cover the X-Axis (equatorial) proposed waveshape.
Chart 29) Shows the X-Axis estimated waveshape based on the given data.
(same) Three types of core centers (origin)
(same) Big negative dip for the surface gravity
(additional) “S” curve at 1/4x lambda (inner belt)
(additional) “S” curve at 1/2x lambda (outer belt)
(same) “S” curve at 1x lambda (geosync)
(same) “S” curve at 2x lambda (magnetosphere) [off page]
Chart 30) Fourier analysis of X-axis (equatorial) estimated waveshape shows four
harmonics for all core types.
Chart 31) Documents the fourier analysis errors:
Loss of phase data
Freq resolution (bin width)
Relative amplitude/phase effects frequencies
Chart 32) Conclusions and correlations of the proposed waveshape data.
Number of harmonics
Harmonic frequencies
Chart 33) Show the generation of the harmonic gravity waveshape equation using four frequencies
and four phases – produces 64 possible combinations.
Chart 34) The next charts show the Y-Axis (polar) curve fit equations for the different core types.
Chart 35) Best of six “Hollow core thin crust” plotted (Calculated VS Estimate)
Not a good fit.
Chart 36) Best of five “Hollow core thick crust” plotted (Calculated VS Estimate)
Very good fit!
SPESIF PITCH NOTES(cont) 2/26/09
SECTION 2 WAVESHAPE GENERATION (cont)
Chart 37) Best of seven “Solid core” plotted (Calculated VS Estimate)
Not a good fit.
Chart 38) The next chart shows X-Axis (equatorial) curve fit equations for the different core types.
(Did not include the charts for: “Hollow core thin crust” or “Solid core” as both
were not good fits)
Chart 39) Same “Hollow core thick crust” plotted (Calculated VS Estimate)
Also a good fit!
Chart 40) Analysis and conclusions for the curve fitting plots (Calculated VS Estimate).
Hollow Core – Thin Crust equation with center (origin) feedpoint – BEST fit.
Waveshape might change some with dipole feedpoints.
Chart 41) Analysis and conclusions for using dipole feedpoint wave generation.
Fundamental frequency same amplitude in X and Y axis
Second harmonic reduced amplitude in Y-axis
Third harmonic reduced amplitude in Y-axis
Fourth harmonic canceled in Y-axis
Need a (1/8x) lambda dipole of the fundamental frequency
Chart 42) X-Axis (equatorial) plot of dipole feedpoints for “Hollow core thick crust”. Note similarities
and differences between X-axis center (origin) feedpoint (Chart 39).
a) (same) Inner belt
b) (same) Outer belt
c) (same) Geosync
d) (same) Magnetosphere
e) (different) surface gravity a little less
e) (different) core type – changed Hollow to Solid
f) (different) Higher noise floor – more ripple in the background
Chart 43) Y-Axis (polar) plot of the same dipole feedpoints. Note similarities and differences
between Y-axis center (origin) feedpoint (Chart 36).
a) (same) Geosync
b) (same) Magnetosphere
c) (different) surface gravity a little greater
d) (different) core type – changed Hollow to Solid
Chart 44) The dipole feedpoints cause the planet shape to be elliptical (flattened) due to small
value differences in the generated waveshape on the X and Y axis.
Chart 44A) The wave harmonics of the earth’s atmosphere, surface and core. The fundamental
bounds the ionosphere, the second harmonic bounds the mantle and fourth harmonic
bounds the inner core. All three harmonics stir the (liquid) outer core.
SPESIF PITCH NOTES(cont) 2/26/09
SECTION 2 WAVESHAPE GENERATION (cont)
Chart 45) The following charts show the 3D composite plots of the X and Y axis gravity waveshapes
along with the fourier analysis.
Chart 46) Gravity waveshape plotted in normal 3D space. A large (node) spike at the
center (origin) and a set of harmonic ripples.
Chart 47) Same gravity waveshape only rotated 90deg to show
the gradient field. (MatLab requirement)
Chart 48) Fourier analysis of the same gravity waveshape. Note the four harmonics.
Chart 49) The next charts cover Tesla’s data from his Colorado experiments.
Chart 50) Tesla’s electromagnetic frequency spectra of the earth:
a) Contains four harmonics
Chart 51) Fourier analysis of Tesla’s frequency data.
Note: similarities to the fourier analysis of the proposed gravity waveshape (chart 48).
Chart 51A) “Schumann Resonances” data.
Same as Tesla’s data (chart 50) only with fifth harmonic. At the time I
did this study I knew nothing about “Schumann Resonances” only had
Tesla’s data. He never got much credit for any of his work (power grid, motors).
SECTION 3 GRAVITY CONCLUSIONS
Chart 52) The next chart wraps up this “Study of Gravity”.
Chart 53) Results and conclusions of this study are:
Gravity is generated by low frequency standing waves
These same waves also generate:
Magnetosphere
Radiation belts
Planet core layers
It is composed of four harmonic frequencies
With a dipole source
Is electromagnetic in origin [Tesla data]
Frequency being the Scale Factor
Atoms [high Ghz]
2 comments ↓
Yes, very coooooool!
I think cool sums it all up very nicely.
I think the term, reverse phase, is a good one and fits what Mike is discussing.
A reverse phase effect is what you get between two systems where they have a differential in their underlying energy, in relation to their internal and external dynamics being inversely proportional.
It is the degree of this energy differential which determines the time and space differential existing between them.
An increase in the energy differential will force the one with the higher energy to move away (apart) from the one with the lower energy.