Check this out http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6872
It would appear that a very serious problem exists with our modern wireless communications systems.
If cell phones cause cancer and other related health hazards there must be some effect to the environment and perhaps to the planet itself.
We are gradually wrapping the planet in a blanket of electromagnetic radiation and we wonder why there might be changes in the weather?
The big problem in coming to terms with this issue has to do with the science or science as it exists today.
Our modern science does not acknowledge an underlying force of energy.
Consequently if you were to ask a physicist why the universe does not fold on itself you would be told because it doesn’t. The universe is not folding on itself so what’s the problem?
If we do not know the answer we do not know very much about what maintains and supports physical structure.
If we consider an underlying force of energy sustaining and perpetuating physical structure we might get the idea that physical structure is a continuance as it is continuously changing, as in a dynamic state.
So the dynamics determining the form and function of physical structure are determined on the basis of a dynamic force of energy.
If an extremely non-uniform potential acts upon the continuance of physical structure a distortional effect occurs, whereby the structural dynamics of the physical structure are distorted in a manner affecting its form and function.
Therefore these distortional effects are not limited to or restricted to flora and fauna but must also have an effect on inanimate objects as well, such as bridges, buildings, ships, planes etc. as well as the biosphere and the geosphere.
And when we take into account the short history of these modern inventions and the limited knowledge we possess concerning our planet it could be stated that we are not at all sure as to what the effects might be or just how severe they might be.
If we can use the history of the nuclear agenda as an example, where many of the hazards have been down played and glossed over we might realize there is good reason to listen carefully to what the experts are saying.
DANGER…EXTREME DANGER!
8 comments ↓
I bet you would have also freaked out when the first public radio broadcasts came out
There appears to be a link between cell phones and brain cancer. You may remember the Iridium satellite phone. They cautioned the user not to hold the headset up to your ear until the connection is made. The story is someone held the phone to his ear immediately to see if anything would happen and was suddenly bedridden for two days. Other than blaming the phone incident doctors were unable to diagnose the affliction. Must be like when you have one of those big slurrpy drinks and you get brain freeze.
In the early days there was only AM radio plying the airwaves. Today there’s AM AND FM, plus microwave saturation from wireless cable, wifi, bluetooth, vhf, uhf, vlf and of course, cell phones. In North America some people have been making the connection to the missing bees suggesting that the cell phone frequency might be interfering with the bees’ homing device. Apparently this is not the case in Asia but they use a different system.
You’ll recall the earlier scare that cell phones cause brain damage where everyone went out and bought a headset for their phone so they could be hands free for driving, etc. The critics said that instead of being radiated through the air the user was now hardwired in with his earpiece and would receive the radiation directly to his brain.
However you dice it one thing’s for sure. The planet is now encircled with microwave radiation and since a microwave oven cooks from the inside out you could make the argument that cell phones cause global warming.
The incidents of brain cancer related to cell phone use has been covered extensively in the past leading one to simply make the leap of faith that it must be true. Does anyone have statistics pointing to an increase in brain trauma, and are they cell phone users. Silly question.
Just imagine a moment what might happen to phone sales if the predicted dna brain cancer epidemic were actually linked empirically to cell phones. Imagine that it happens and people start dropping like flies. People would be throwing out their microwave ovens. They would stop using wi fi and just about anything wireless that radiated. But would they throw away their mobiles? Probably not unless they make new ‘safe’ cell phones. With a camera, still and movie mode with sound, an internet connection, games, a calculator and alarm with a really big keypad for fast sms, the cell phone has become everybody’s favorite toy. It can ring or play your favorite song, it’s a call coming in for YOU:
Hello? Sorry, you’re breaking up. Stand by the window. No try something else. What do you mean, now you can’t hear me. Hello?
Anyone can ridicule me for being upset about such things as cell phones, but many studies have been done by those not contracted to the industry and have found some solid evidence concerning a very serious problem.
Unfortunately the science that explains the reason for such effects also relates to very sophisticated weapons systems which are highly classified, so what did you expect, that they would give up their secrets to prevent cancer?
Get a grip Inc. read the reports by people who really do care about the consequences, especially when it concerns children.
“but many studies have been done by those not contracted to the industry and have found some solid evidence concerning a very serious problem.”
Could you please reference this claim.
The latest review of studies in this area has been that there is no link with their use and cancer and that there is no evidence of having any effect on health. However they do point out that that there are a few inconclusive studies pointing to the possibility of a link to intracranial tumours after long exposure and also that there has been no epidemiologic studies on children who may be more sensitive to the frequencies used (but there is not evidence to support this). (reference http://tinyurl.com/cby5va).
The full review covering a large area is here http://tinyurl.com/2vte3d
Now i guess you could just dismiss this by claiming its all part of a cover up by mobile phone companies (even though SCENIHR is an independent committee.)
Sorry Inc. but I am not going to hold your hand on this one.
You can believe whatever you want, that’s your choice to make.
But as you might notice a child’s skull is not quite as thick as yours and the radiation penetrates deeper into the brain.
Some docs are suggesting no one under the age of 20 should be using a cell phone other than in an emergency situation.
You hold my hand?
All I asked was for you to provide evidence that support your claims, the fact is the epidemiologic evidence out there is that mobile phones do not cause cancer (nor headaches or dizziness) and that there simply isn’t conclusive evidence for other problems. Now although i agree there is a diffrence between an adult and a child skull this doesn’t automatically mean there is a defiantly a risk, there just isn’t the evidence ether way.
I am not into just believing what ever I want but forming my opinions based on the best evidence that I am aware of.
Wet your whistle with this one;
http://commonground.ca/iss/0612185/cg185_cellphone.shtml
And i wondered why IQs were dropping so rapidly in the last decade…
Exponential popularity of Blue Tooth literally “eating” away at the cerebral cortex?
How poetically ironic.