Entries from February 2009 ↓

Can there be any doubt as to why free energy and gravity control are suppressed.  New technologies beyond combustion have always been a threat, including steam and the original electric cars.  Now, with the public demanding no pollution transportation it looks like the world running on oil days are numbered.  As are coal and nuclear for our electricity. 

As we watch the last oil sands slip through the hourglass and we find ourselves at that lowest ebb, this is the moment of change.  Magnets to replace combustion.  And finally,

Unity

We have holistic medicine in the form of herbal remedies, not to mention the holistic life style etc.

But now we have holistic physics as well, in relation to the underlying dynamics of universe as described in the book Unity, which can be read on this site http://www.gravitycontrol.org

The natural dynamics of universe…a simple perception of the way things work.

This would explain the significance of sacred symbols dating back so many thousands of year, such as the sacred circle.

Unity follows a natural path leading to unification in the form of a unified field system.  And in the case of our universe a series of unified field systems all interconnected and interlocked by way of time/line differentials affecting time/line distortions as described at http:www.gravityc-idealism.blogspot.com

Project Unity provides a holistic approach to space travel in the form of a Field Frequency Modulator capable not only of controlling gravity but providing a drive system devoid of any fuel supply, as no fuel of any kind is required in the form of a gas, liquid or solid fuel.

In the case of Unity (the book)…quantum physics goes holistic.  The natural source energy supply, natures very own answer to oil, gas, coal and nuclear power.

Nothing new at all, as the underlying force of universe has been determining the form and function of physical structure for a very long time and continues to do so 24/7.

A couple of years ago NASA reported that some of our atmosphere was escaping into space.

They said molecules of moisture were rising to great heights where their molecular bonds were breaking.  Most of the oxygen was falling back but much of the hydrogen was not falling back but continuing on into open space.

The standard argument I have been given against my idea of an energy differential is that hydrogen is simply lighter than air and of course it is.

But there is no air up there.  So how does hydrogen escape into open space and head off toward the moon under its own power.  No air and no rockets.

The rising moisture has an underlying energy potential higher than that of the surrounding atmosphere and up it goes.  As it gains altitude so does its energy differential with the surrounding environment.  And when it gets to a certain altitude its energy is too high to maintain its molecular bonds and they break.

Consequently the hydrogen just keeps going and will keep right on going.

The underlying energy of the earth’s field decreases with altitude, which when viewed as a unified field of frequency extends all the way to the outer edge of the visible universe.

A simple differential in energy is the key to gravity control and or anti-gravity.

This in itself should tell us something, as well as show us something.  Hydrogen atoms are doing what it takes a very expensive rocket to do and that is to escape the earth’s gravity.

How much simpler can it get than an energy differential, unless of course you insist on denying the existence of an underlying force of energy?

How else would anyone explain hydrogen atoms taking off into space and heading for parts unknown?

The very latest on the question, did we or didn’t we go to the moon?, is a mix of, yes we did, some of the time.  

I think we went to the moon.  But why did we stop?

This is a possible answer

possible answer

A few years ago and in the old blog, I posted a 1947 Volkswagen pic and stated that the Unity system would even work with an airtight VW.  At the time this was met with opposition that somehow it wasn’t classy so I removed it.  Since then I have lamented that the point is, Unity will work no matter what the vehicle shape.  So, it’s back.  The 1947 VW with a Unity drive.  Not as romantic as a saucer shape and probably not a good idea to take it into outer space or for that matter, great sea depths.  But since the 1947 VW was airtight (it floats, no Kennedy jokes), it could serve as a prototype.  I’m not suggesting that we should but it could.

any airtight shape