What if we took all these unsold new cars -
And refitted the combustion engine with the Unity drive.
Do you think people would buy em?
Renewable Energy and Green Ideas
January 23rd, 2009 — Uncategorized
What if we took all these unsold new cars -
And refitted the combustion engine with the Unity drive.
Do you think people would buy em?
January 20th, 2009 — Uncategorized
Here is the list, not gravity control,
January 18th, 2009 — Uncategorized
We have been censored by physicsforum.com.
We passed on Mike’s Boeing paper on gravity to them and it was rejected out of hand.
Possibly because the info came from Gravity Control? Possibly since no perpetual motion or free energy machine is patentable in the US. About five thousand US patents have been held in abeyance, rejected or classified since January 2008. And gravity control and antigravity are words that seem to shudder their community. The message of this Boeing report came from gravitycontrol.org. They didn’t shoot the messenger but they shut him down, quickly recognizing that ours was a crackpot website.
But the Boeing piece by Mike Gamble was done under the authorization of Boeing. It would appear that physicsforum.com didn’t check out that aspect.
Here is part of our conversation with physicsforum.com
PF: Dear tesonified (pseudonym), You have received a warning at Physics Forums.
Reason:
——-
General Warning
Posting links to crackpot “anti-gravity” sites is not permitted on PF.
GC: I think this is unfair.
I was posting a link to a document, created by BOEING, and its about gravity!
What you consider crackpot, well, how would I know?!?
tesonified is Online:
Posts: 0
GC: (to the crowd at physicsforum.com) You are being censored. I tried to share this with you earlier This link is to a document about gravity (produced by Boeing) that I thought
would be of interest to this community.
If you take the time to look at the document, you might see why its posted.
It’s most likely beyond the majority of the audience.
< crackpot link removed > uh, that’s www.gravitycontrol.org
The message (and my reply)
I think this is unfair….
PF: Please review our posting rules, which are linked at the top of
every page; note especially the section on “Overly Speculative
Posts”.
——-
Original Post:
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2038059
Warnings serve as a reminder to you of the forum’s rules, which….
GC: Very interesting study on Gravity by Boeing
. Our posting of Michael A. Gamble’s Boeing gravity paper
http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2009/01/16/gravity-study-by-mike-gamble-boeing/
There was more but, just to give you a taste.
Science today is amazing in one aspect in that they know what they know and reject that which they do not know.
January 16th, 2009 — Science
GravityControl.org was fortunate to obtain (with approval) a document on Gravity written by Mike Gamble of the Boeing Company. Providing a mathematical analysis of what is known and extensive data, it also looks at Tesla’s findings.
The document (BOE 111308-3666) Gravity Study – Download
January 12th, 2009 — Uncategorized
In the documentary movie, Who Killed the Electric Car, the answer was the government, corporations and people. Not a big seller claimed GM.
It might have been like the laser disc, watch a movie or music concert on your tv in your own home. The laser disc mostly failed to VHS tape not Sony’s betacam. The Sony system was better but VHS had the movies and their machine was 20 percent the price of the Sony unit. And, at the time, VHS had three speeds which seemed like an added bonus. But that’s not why the laser disc failed. With VHS or Betacam, you could record shows right off your tv while you were sleeping or doing something else. More than that, you could buy a video camera and watch your own home made movies. But laser disc persisted as a system and was the best, as in betacam was better than vhs but failed to have the movies, big mistake. How does this relate to the destruction of the EV1? It doesn’t. Not directly. The EV1 was sabotaged. The laser disc was phased out through competition.
The EV1 (GM’s all electric vehicle of the ’90′s) could travel 150 miles on a single charge. They leased these vehicles to companies and at least one movie star, Tom Hanks. Then when they decided the Electric Vehicle One was a bad idea, they called in their leases, recovered all the vehicles, and General Motors willingly destroyed not only all the EV1′s but took the plans out into the Arizona desert, shredded them and tossed them to the wind.
Today, the new GM Volt will travel 40 miles before it must switch to the accompanying combustion engine to take it any further.
Really, what’s going on? Has GM forgotten totally how to remake the EV1?
It’s like we’ve forgotten how to go to the moon.
A NASA spokesperson was heard to say, we don’t have the technology right now to land and safely return a man from the moon. Maybe the Apollo plans were also shredded in the Arizona desert along with those of the EV1.
Did we go to the moon? Some say it was an American cold war stunt against the Russians, something created on Stanley Kubrick’s Space Odyssey moon set. Personally I believe that is a hoax and America did go to the moon. Why not return? They say in hushed tones, somebody else was already there. They also say the secret US space program has bases on the moon and mars.
True or not, the EV1 was real and GM killed a better electric car than they have today.