Comments on: Censored Because of The Messenger http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2009/01/18/censored-because-of-the-messenger/ Renewable Energy and Green Ideas Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:33:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: David http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2009/01/18/censored-because-of-the-messenger/comment-page-1/#comment-6198 David Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:02:05 +0000 http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/?p=496#comment-6198 If one does enough reading and searching one might come to the conclusion that our modern physics is a bit of a mess where any one of several theories of how and why the universe is the way it is might be considered. So we have a multiple choice situation, where we each get to choose our favorite flavor. But should one suggest or question the absurdity of applying static terms to describe a dynamic condition one is called a crack-pot. My opinion is that very few understand or fully comprehend what a relative condition of universe looks like, while the rest simply try and sing along and in situations where they do not know the lyrics they simply hum to the music. If one does enough reading and searching one might come to the conclusion that our modern physics is a bit of a mess where any one of several theories of how and why the universe is the way it is might be considered.

So we have a multiple choice situation, where we each get to choose our favorite flavor.

But should one suggest or question the absurdity of applying static terms to describe a dynamic condition one is called a crack-pot.

My opinion is that very few understand or fully comprehend what a relative condition of universe looks like, while the rest simply try and sing along and in situations where they do not know the lyrics they simply hum to the music.

]]> By: Claude http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2009/01/18/censored-because-of-the-messenger/comment-page-1/#comment-6197 Claude Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:00:26 +0000 http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/?p=496#comment-6197 So, that which can not be proven = crackpot? According to them anyway... I guess they're not very religious over on physics forum! So, that which can not be proven = crackpot?
According to them anyway…

I guess they’re not very religious over on physics forum!

]]>