Zap and Spin VS Focus

The simple difference between zap and spin and focus to achieve spin is, the unhinged scientific community’s reliance on rockets, and spin can come in a later generation.  Although they must think about it.  

When you realize that the whole universe spins you also come to the realization that it takes focus to tap the spin.

The universe spins like a cd.  And with that you don’t have to travel all tracks to get to the track you’re looking for.  You just punch in a number and you’re there.  

Non linear time field frequency acceleration works similarly.  

You don’t have to travel from track one to get to 23.  By simply punching in 23 you bypass 2 thru 22 and go directly to track 23.

What does it take to get qualified scientific people to think this way instead of rockets?

The cd analogy probably doesn’t cut it with science today.  

Yet, to go to the moon or anywhere else without using propulson requires a kind of thought beyond a simple here to there.

If we were more physically etheric we wouldn’t even need a machine.  

But the idea is foreign. 

No point A to point B?  Well yes but through instantaneous transformation.  

If you can fathom this idea you can eliminate the point A to point B idea of linear travel.  And as a physical force in some kind of craft (perhaps saucer shaped?), except for a few, this idea is foreign.  

But remember the cd.  It’s a disc that will take you to the beginning middle or end in a key stroke.  

Unlike a recording tape that takes a while at high speed to get from track one to track 23.

How to make NTFFA understood.  But if you can do it on a cd, why not in life?

What we need is a belief system to evolve from, let us say, GM?