Entries from August 2008 ↓

  http://www.postchronicle.com/news/science/article_212163105.shtml  

Anyone reading the book Unity will encounter my views regarding the use of static linear terms attempting to evaluate a dynamic universe.Not something you want to try while balancing a full cup of coffee.

For some unknown reason the non-absolute nature of our linear terms seems to escape the attention of most people where they think they can apply terms such as seconds and meters in attempting to determine the age and size of universe.Of course such terms are very handy and seemingly adequate for the purposes of trade and commerce, but to apply these same terms in attempting to discern the age and or size of universe is an impossible task.

How so?  Because no two seconds are of the same absolute duration nor are any two meters of the same absolute length, which means that each and every second is of a slightly different duration and every meter is of a slightly different length.On top of this we are confronted with a dynamic universe which is continuously expanding at an accelerative rate of expansion.

Oh boy, don’t we have fun.   And many honestly believe the speed of light remains constant for periods measured in millions and billions of years, whereby it might be possible to determine the age and size of universe based on the constancy of light speed.

Here we come to another basic problem, as it is also assumed that light is in fact in linear motion much like a train or bus. Therefore light speed is determined on the basis of the duration of time it takes light to travel one meter, which is 1/299,792,458ths of a second.

But this particular speed of light is a fixed measure due to the uncertainty regarding the exact speed of light. It would seem that the speed of light was not very cooperative in assuring all concerned that the speed was in fact constant, as it kept changing.

To put an end to any confusion or misunderstanding it was agreed that the exact speed of light would be fixed at exactly 299,792,458 meters per second regardless of any further considerations.

It is also believed by most that time remains constant regardless of your position in space whereby it might be possible for the speed of light to be constant across the breadth and depth of universe.

How this should be possible in respect to a dynamic condition of universe is difficult to fathom, but that is the position taken by most scientists.So what we end up with is a tidy figure representing the age and the size of universe but having no corresponding relationship to the actual age or size of the universe, which begs one to ask why this should be tolerated. After all it is science isn’t it? Or is it?

If no two seconds are of the same absolute duration and no two meters are of the same absolute length and the size of universe keeps changing along with the value of time how should it be possible to determine the age and size of universe on the basis of seconds and meters?It’s simply not possible.The idea of the universe being so many years old and having a radius of so many light years is in fact a bogus concept devoid of any scientific value or merit.

In our earlier communications, circa 2005-6, David and I would ponder how it might be possible to build and pilot Unity by remote control.  The problem is, a field within a field means that electromagnetic communication is impossible because the magnetic waves won’t penetrate the field.   A radical Thomas Townsend Brown concept was to substitue gravity waves for electromagnetic waves because if you can carry a signal on gravity, it will penetrate everything including the inner field.   TT Brown filed his patent in 1953 and today, the very idea of using gravity waves for communications seems a bit screwy. However, once we all become space dogs flitting from this galaxy to the next, the idea of normal radio will cease to be useful.  The reason is that electrogravitic communications is not bound by the speed of light.  It is bound by the speed of gravity.  Since gravity has no speed, being either on or off, the transmission electrogravitically would be instantaneous to anywhere in the universe, leaving electromagnetic transmission left lagging in the pixie dust at the mere speed of light, meaning thousands and perhaps millions of light years for the delivery of a normal radio message. My belief is that electrogravitic communications and the Unity drive go hand in hand as they both have the capability of instantaneous transformation from point to point.  Not to mention that one won’t work without the other.   The idea of sending a message electrograviticaly works on the larger scale, such as anything bigger than here to the moon where the speed of electromagnetic radio starts to show its limitations, light speed, a little slow if you’re heading across the universe. For some this may seem a bit too large to comprehend but it’s not that bad.   Thomas Townsend Brown was a real guy.  Electrogravitic Communications is his idea, his invention.Start here:  http://www.qualight.com/ecomm/ecomm.htm 

In the near two years plus fifty that it took David Barclay to assemble the seventeen chapters of Unity, although he did write an introduction, he revised it when he finished the book.  Here now, is the introduction to the theory of Unity: Ever since Newton formulated his gravitational theory we have accepted the simple contention that gravity increases to the center of the Earth and inversely decreases from the center of the Earth in a manner whereby the force of attraction decreases in proportion to the inverse square of the distance…Newton based his theory on some very fancy footwork, which necessitated the invention of calculus. And up to this point the apparent rational logic of his mathematical innovations are considered to be beyond question, as the numbers don’t lie. But despite the accuracy of the mathematical calculations the idealistic legitimacy of linear based geometry being capable of accurately describing the dimensional properties of our planet is extremely doubtful. Unity 

Electric cars, electric trains, why not electric planes.