Some prefer to call it global warming, while others are attempting to convince the world that by cutting back on carbon emissions a crisis can be avoided.
Climate change runs in cycles and for the most part such changes are driven by the sun in relation to relative differentials in energy existing between the earth and the sun.
The idea that we can avoid a change in the earth’s climate by cutting back on carbon emissions is wishful thinking.
When you consider the fact that carbon dioxide makes up such a tiny portion of the earth’s atmosphere, a fraction of one-percent, it is hard to understand the logic behind the idea that carbon emissions are responsible for climate change.
1 comment so far ↓
Well now hold on there pardner cuz if the carbon in the air was say, 10%, we’d be breathing sludge. It’s not that the percentage of carbon to other gases is extremely low. That’s a good thing. But if extremely low suddenly explodes into soot to breathe via volcano or impact from space, well, they say that is a near planet killer, back to rodent mammals again. What we have to do this trip around if indeed this is some kind of cycle, is to break same and move on to the next biggie.
I’m speaking of the presecion cycle that connects with 2012. Just caught a movie, 2012, Doomsday, had to buy it to see if there was anything worthy of this cheap thrill film, cashing in early on 2012. Nothing. If I’m wrong please point out where. A dud movie. The only good thing is to pinpoint 2012. In my travels, the Nibiru factor looms. If Zecharia Sitchin is correct in his interpretation of Sumerian text, Nibiru may be on the way. Another interpretation is that by 2009 we will see Nibiru coming and by 2012 the wayward planet of our solar system, said to only return every 3600 years, will return. And scare the poop out of all of us. Certainly me. However with Sitchin, he says the people of Nibiru will fly over in rockets, since it’s so close.
Hope it’s more like, Unity?