Entries from July 2008 ↓

Another snippet from W. David Barclay’s Unity:

The initial idea of a nuclear process capable of safely and efficiently 

providing the necessary power required for our industry and 

commerce should have been dismissed as an inclination to madness, 

but it was not.  It was considered better for people to believe a lie than 

to know the truth, as the truth would indicate a failure to develop a 

peaceful purpose for atomic energy in the form of a safe and efficient 

nuclear industry based on an advanced understanding of science and 

technology. 

Even today the lie continues, as we are constantly assured of the 

safety involved in the management of our nuclear facilities despite the 

fact that the growing inventory of nuclear waste material represents a 

direct threat to our health and safety. 

To fully appreciate the consequences of the nuclear agenda requires a 

basic understanding of those principles associated with the underlying 

dynamics affecting the form and function of physical structure.  And 

in this respect it is important to remember that simplicity is the key 

word as the universe does not function in the complex manner that 

many existing perceptions might indicate. 

http://www.gravitycontrol.org/unity-book.html

When my wife watches what I watch for five minutes she comments, they’re only guessing, they don’t really know.  They’re making it up.She has little interest in how the universe works and flying to another planet. When David attacks Newtonian physics, it’s a beautiful thing.  Attacking the sacred, the holy grail, offering logic and balance for the attack.  Kind of like a miracle but I must continue later because of certain linear events, like those that take place on a farm.  Beyond legit what lingers is the aspect of light.  The Michelson and Morley experiments that supposedly proved there was no aether but also proved that light had no speed?  

The first time I heard Larry King was on a radio feed in 1995 where OJ called in and vowed to dedicate his life to pursuing the real killer.  I was impressed with the guests Larry would get and became a fan.In all of that time up until recently, I never saw a show on Larry King Live on ufo’s.  But in the last six weeks or so he’s done three shows on flying saucers.  And each succeeding show had bolder and bolder headlines suggesting that the US appears to be preparing to make some sort of announcement.  First France then England released their ufo docs, and actually Brazil preceded both countries by releasing their ufo documents earlier.I’m not suggesting anything other than ufo shows are good for ratings but it does appear odd that Larry King did nothing on the subject in my 13 years as a viewer of his program (altho he claims to have done many shows on ufo’s on his radio program prior to CNN).   The shows themselves have been of a very low calibre consisting of a couple of guests who believe touting their latest book and a ufo documentary maker pushing his latest film, plus a skeptic.  These programs have begun in a civilized manner and you get the impression that maybe this time we’ll get some real answers.  But, inevitably, and especially with the skeptic in the mix, the programs have burned up a lot of time vacillating between, are they real, no they’re not, yes they are, all the time we have, goodnight.  These have been programs of questions and no answers as have so many ufo documentaries before.Larry King’s last ufo program just a few days ago was the best of a bad three.  What made it good was Seth Shostak from SETI (search for et intelligence) who rose above the bickering and started to do an act about abductions, dental work and anal probing, none of which he said but did say that there were lots of abduction stories about inappropriate things taking place on a first date.  He was sharp and funny.  And a professional et searcher.The problem of course is that we’re simply rehashing 60 year old Roswell stuff about lights in the sky and the program does NOT ask, how do they work? If the media could just get excited about how gravity control works there could easily be a mounting force to persuade more openness.First he presents the current fate of the airline industry.  Then he does a third ufo show.  So hats off to Larry King for making it globally okay to ask the questions, how do they work, and, can I have a ride?  

Another slice of Unity by W. David Barclay.

The only reason that space and motion exist, in relation to the
various points and or systems of reference, is due to the non-
absolute nature of universe.

The same underlying principles which determine the relative
spacing and motion of the planets, moons and sun constituting
our solar system also determine the relative spacing and motion
of electrons, protons and neutrons constituting the atomic field
system of each atom, therefore the rules are the same.

It is of the utmost importance that it be clearly understood that
physical structure of any kind exists, regardless of its condition,
as a field of frequency corresponding to the continuous
acceleration of (ntffa).

Unity

Where are we?

In relation to navigating the universe aboard a craft utilizing a field frequency modulator a map is not going to be of much help, at least not a typical star map.

The first rule of thought is to realize the universe is not linearly structured and does not function in a linear manner. Therefore a ruler and a clock are not going to be of much help.

As the universe exists relative to every system in motion or every system of reference the condition of universe is different for each and every system of universe and the craft utilizing the field frequency modulator is no exception, as it is itself a distinct system of reference.

This means the universe is distinctly different for the navigator of such a craft.

A position in space corresponds to a specific rate of non-linear time field frequency acceleration, as all interactions between two or more physical bodies involves a relative differential in non-linear time field frequency acceleration.

In other words you know where you are by means of a differential in non-linear time field frequency acceleration, between the craft you are in and all other systems remaining relative to your craft.

In that space is not linearly structured there is no means by which to measure the distance between yourself and a distant point using a linear unit of measure. So miles and or light years are not going to work because space exists in a dynamic state and as such is either expanding or contracting in a continuous manner.

Our common perception of space suggests that space is an obstacle to be overcome by some form of propulsion, yet in terms of universe existing in a simultaneous state there are no obstacles to overcome.

If space is simply a differential in non-linear time field frequency acceleration the only thing causing you to be separated from any other position in space is non-linear time field frequency acceleration. And as a field frequency modulator modulates non-linear time field frequency acceleration in a controlled manner it is possible to modulate any existing differential in non-linear time field frequency acceleration.

Therefore there is no actual travel involved in respect to getting from here to there.

Rockets are one thing…….gravity control is quite another.

And regardless of where you are you will always perceive yourself to be at the center of universe.

Travel between star systems is instantaneous…….the only way to fly.

So navigating space is very much a multi-dimensional experience in that you experience the non-simultaneous condition of where you are while you also experience the simultaneous condition of universe during transport.