Comments on: Crop Circle Dynamics http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2007/02/20/crop-circle-dynamics/ Renewable Energy and Green Ideas Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:33:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: David Barclay http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2007/02/20/crop-circle-dynamics/comment-page-1/#comment-278 David Barclay Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:16:00 +0000 http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2007/02/20/crop-circle-dynamics/#comment-278 No, not all crop circles would look the same, and of course they do not.<br/><br/>As meteorites burn up in the atmosphere not only do the fragments distort the field in which they exist, but the earth's field also distorts the field of the fragments.<br/><br/>This results in complex as well as fairly simple patterns forming via vlf resonance.<br/><br/>There is nothing random about any of this, although it may appear that way. It's a simple case of energy and energy differentials interacting in a dynamic manner, which is the basis of all physical structure.<br/><br/>If you were to read chapters 1 through 7 of the book Unity you might get a clearer picture of the situation.<br/><br/>Remember that all the sacred geometry of any civilization was first observed in nature and then adopted for a specific purpose. No, not all crop circles would look the same, and of course they do not.

As meteorites burn up in the atmosphere not only do the fragments distort the field in which they exist, but the earth’s field also distorts the field of the fragments.

This results in complex as well as fairly simple patterns forming via vlf resonance.

There is nothing random about any of this, although it may appear that way. It’s a simple case of energy and energy differentials interacting in a dynamic manner, which is the basis of all physical structure.

If you were to read chapters 1 through 7 of the book Unity you might get a clearer picture of the situation.

Remember that all the sacred geometry of any civilization was first observed in nature and then adopted for a specific purpose.

]]> By: Marc http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2007/02/20/crop-circle-dynamics/comment-page-1/#comment-277 Marc Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:24:00 +0000 http://www.gravitycontrol.org/blog/2007/02/20/crop-circle-dynamics/#comment-277 If crop circles were formed by meteorites falling from space and being physically altered such as to react to an underlying universal force, wouldn't all crop circles either look the same, or be completely random? They're definitely organized in a design, which tells me that they're not just products of falling material, unless, that is, the material is projected into our atmosphere so as to cause these patterns to appear through the process you described. Your words make sense. Your definition makes sense. The process you describe makes some sort of wacky sense. But logically, it's all too uniform to be random. A meteor shower, such as you describe, would cause an image to form that would be quite random, or, at the very least, circular, as all the particles in the area align to each other.<br/><br/>We can find answers to any problem we dream up. If we look hard enough, we can prove or disprove anything. Theories are made to things that don't make any kind of sense at all, even if it's all provable through formulas and experiments. I remember a while back, there was a report in France about how the Chihuahua was actually a relative of insects, rather than mammals. They had tests and everything to prove their point. Of course that's ridiculous. But you can prove anything if you try hard enough. <br/><br/>I'm all for forward thinking, abstract thinking, new and different approaches. God knows we need a fresh perspective in science. But lets not loose our objectivity. Lets not get so caught up in our own theories that we become closed minded again. That makes us no different from the "Conventional" scientists that still say certain things are impossible.<br/><br/>mvon@tpk.net If crop circles were formed by meteorites falling from space and being physically altered such as to react to an underlying universal force, wouldn’t all crop circles either look the same, or be completely random? They’re definitely organized in a design, which tells me that they’re not just products of falling material, unless, that is, the material is projected into our atmosphere so as to cause these patterns to appear through the process you described. Your words make sense. Your definition makes sense. The process you describe makes some sort of wacky sense. But logically, it’s all too uniform to be random. A meteor shower, such as you describe, would cause an image to form that would be quite random, or, at the very least, circular, as all the particles in the area align to each other.

We can find answers to any problem we dream up. If we look hard enough, we can prove or disprove anything. Theories are made to things that don’t make any kind of sense at all, even if it’s all provable through formulas and experiments. I remember a while back, there was a report in France about how the Chihuahua was actually a relative of insects, rather than mammals. They had tests and everything to prove their point. Of course that’s ridiculous. But you can prove anything if you try hard enough.

I’m all for forward thinking, abstract thinking, new and different approaches. God knows we need a fresh perspective in science. But lets not loose our objectivity. Lets not get so caught up in our own theories that we become closed minded again. That makes us no different from the “Conventional” scientists that still say certain things are impossible.

mvon@tpk.net

]]>