In past posts and articles I have written on the subject of Back Engineering UFO Type Craft, with one such article posted on Peswiki.

Despite decades of denial and debunking it is fair to say that the military/industrial complex has done a fair job of keeping the existence of UFO and ET within the realm of science fiction.

If the military do have extraterrestrial artifacts it would appear they are, at the very least, having a tough time trying to back engineer the technology involved and an even tougher time attempting to understand the required science.

It would appear that the military might have maneuvered themselves into a catch 22 situation, as in order to keep their secret things secret they cannot openly seek out solutions to very difficult problems associated with extraterrestrial science and technology.

The biggest snag is the fact that secrets themselves are problematic and the greater the complexity of the secrets the more problematic they become, especially after decades of deception associated with secret research and development.

If the science is the real problem, which I think it is, it could be many more decades before the applicable solutions are finally realized, unless of course someone comes up with the answers in the meantime.

Here at Gravity Control we are attempting to present an alternative view concerning the dynamics of non-linear drive in the form of a field frequency modulator.  It’s a simple idea, but not one that is easily grasped without a certain degree of openness or a willingness to consider alternative explanations for the existing conditions of universe.

No one with any degree of comprehension and or understanding is going to attempt interstellar transport with anything less than a non-linear drive system capable of instantaneous transformation, which puts the military establishment at a bit of a disadvantage in attempting to achieve such a goal or duplicate extraterrestrial science and technology.

The first problem with the science is coming to terms with the concept of a universe which not only exists as a non-simultaneous condition remaining relative to the system of reference but also exists in a dynamic state, whereby an underlying force of energy sustains and perpetuates the existence of this condition.

To appreciate the situation we only have to consider the fact that a nuclear reactor is presently considered efficiently suitable for the purpose of heating water.  And in this respect the heavy elements constituting the nuclear fuel are thought to provide a source of energy proportional to their mass.

The science involved appears logical enough until you attempt to understand what it is which prevents the universe from collapsing on itself.

For a long time it was thought that the universe was running down, which allowed for the idea that the expansion of universe was slowing, whereby it would eventually stop expanding and start contracting.  But as we have discovered this is not the case, as the rate of expansion is accelerating.

This has led to the idea of dark matter and dark energy, without anyone being quite sure what either is.

On top of this we have found background radiation, which is believed to be left over from the big bang.

If the universe is acceleratively expanding, the relative rate of expansion must be proportional to an increasing source of energy capable of sustaining the accelerative expansion.  Therefore the supply of energy must also be accelerating.

This would indicate that the universe is dynamically structured, whereby the basic elements of universe must also be dynamically structured.

We presently consider atomic elements to be running down or decaying in that they are thought to lose energy in proportion to a decrease in mass, but if they are not running down but are in fact being sustained and perpetuated by a steady increase in energy our existing perception of the situation must be in error.

If there is an underlying source of energy sustaining and perpetuating physical structure we can be quite sure we do not yet know exactly what energy is, because if we did we would have already developed a non-linear drive system capable of providing for instantaneous transformation.

Yet our human logic prevents us from moving forward, as we appear trapped in our own thoughts concerning the nature of energy.  We evaluate energy as corresponding to a proportional quantity of mass, where more mass provides more energy.  Of course this is in part true, but in a very general sense.  If an underlying source of energy provides the smaller mass with a higher ratio of energy per unit of mass we might consider our existing perception to be self defeating.

If such an underlying force does exist we might realize that our ideas about strong and weak forces could also be in error, as such forces might be better described as dynamic responses to an underlying force.

Therefore the control of these strong and weak forces should be possible through the controlled modulation of the underlying force, an idea which is readily apparent in nature.  Yet we insist that this is not possible and that no such underlying controlling force exists.

It would appear that the existence of UFO type craft and ET’s prevents us from admitting to such a possibility, as to do so would be viewed as letting the cat out of the bag.  Without such secrets in the form of secret knowledge no one nation or any one person could hope to have control over the rest of the world.

The controlled manipulation of the world’s economy for the purpose of the few would no longer be possible if a source of unlimited energy were available to everyone in an equal manner.  The world’s economy would no longer be based on a restricted supply of energy and raw resources, but on the various purposes to which this new source of energy would be applied.

In light of UFO type craft and ET’s the human race could no longer be considered the only intelligent species in the universe, which would mean that our human activities would be subject to a higher authority than that existing on this earth at the present time.

When you take such ideas into consideration it is not that difficult to understand why and how the existence of UFO type craft and ET’s have remained hidden from public view for so long.

How could the leader of any nation openly admit to the criminal atrocities having been committed for the purpose of hiding the truth from their people?  Such criminal activities cannot be justified in a free and democratic society where each and every citizen is equally subject to the laws and regulations to which they have agreed to abide.

Is it possible for any national administration to come clean and let us in on the truth of this matter or will the truth remain hidden and continue to be protected by whatever means deemed necessary?

If it is the latter, it is not for the purpose of maintaining national security, but for the purpose of hiding the fact that the security of our nation cannot be protected against the influence of extraterrestrial intelligence.

I read your Tom Bearden stuff and I too wondered, why don’t they have the meg by now, seems a long time.

But further to that he revealed that in 1892 Lorentz evened out the math and algebra so so that it would be symmetrical instead of asymmetrical and Bearden’s point was, the smoothing of the equations which are taught as Maxwell today are not Maxwell. They are equations converted to a symmetrical definition and it’s the asymmetrical equations that allow for ‘free energy’.

Before the second world war there was Viktor Schauberger who apparently had flying discs in the 30′s and/or 40′s.

But before Roswell and Schauberger there were visual descriptions like this aboriginal rock painting that might be 40,000 years old.

Question. Since they have had Schauberger’s technology since 1945, why are they spending all this money on rockets? And prey tell, why is the combustion engine still the main squeeze?

I used to believe that Schauberger’s propulsion was not related to antigravity. But the part that apparently Schauberger didn’t understand is that once his torsion field, an implosion effect, not explosion, got up to speed and began to run itself, where was the energy coming from that fed his tornado? Conjecture was, from another dimension. It sure ain’t coming from here. Enter, the underlying force.

Fluxite, looks like a wild goose chase.

Steorn, might be an ad campaign.

According to a comment on ZPenergy, someone tried to prove fluxite and was boggled by a problem with dimensions.

Steorn, born again of the dotcom bust was an ad company capable of swinging a campaign like this.

The lesser of two feebles?

The proof is in the proving.

And both are ASKING to be proven. Instead of announcing that it’s been proven.

Fluxite and Steorn, for different reasons, two entities entering the quest for gravity control. The former exposing its patent for free. The latter, patent pending.

We have become skeptical for good reason.

People keep trying to screw with our quest for truth.

It is considered by many that our planet is slowly expanding with the rate of expansion accelerating over time, an idea with which I agree.  But many of these same people also make the assumption that an increase in the size of the earth will increase the planet’s gravity, an idea with which I disagree.

Gravity is proportional to the ratio of energy per unit of mass and not proportional to mass alone.

It is also thought that it is the compression of gravity acting upon the earth’s core which is responsible for the expansion, but this is not the case as there is virtually no gravity acting upon the earth’s core.

The dynamic structure of our planet is governed by the underlying force, non-linear time field frequency acceleration, which affects both the internal and external dynamics of our planet in an inverse manner.  Therefore gravity does not increase to the core, but increases isometrically from the center of the earth to the surface curve, while gravity increases symmetrically from the depths of space to the surface curve.  So there is insufficient gravity at the core to affect any degree of compression.

The earth’s greatest gravity is across the surface curve, but because the surface of the earth is not perfectly flat there are fluctuations in gravity with altitude above and below sea level.

Gravity is higher at the tops of mountains situated above sea level and higher over deep ocean basins and trenches.  The inside of a mountain is a vertical extension of the earth’s internal dynamics, while a deep depression or trench is a vertical extension of the earth’s external dynamics.

This provides a differential in gravity at various locations where unequal but proportional pressure is applied from above and below the earth’s surface, which in turn stresses the structure of the earth’s crust.

And as the planet is acceleratively expanding in proportion to an accelerating increase in energy affecting the ratio of energy per unit of mass, it can be expected that all matter constituting the structure of the earth should be affected proportionally.  This means that even at the micro level expansion will be experienced.

Therefore a decrease in gravity will not provide for a stable and unchanging condition, as the rate of expansion is constantly increasing simply because it is driven by a dynamic force.

It is a differential in gravity associated with vertical extremes of high and low points across the surface curve which provides the stress associated with sudden tectonic movements and upheavals, in combination with a gradual decline in gravity associated with the process of expansion.

This picture is further compounded by non-uniform distortions originating from the sun, moon and our neighboring planets, in respect to every system of universe sharing a non-uniform relationship.

A very complex picture indeed, which indicates that an increase in non-uniform distortions can be anticipated to dramatically affect the stability of our planet, especially the surface crust.

The surface crust of the earth is the location where the greatest factor of resistance is applied, which not only causes tectonic movement but also affects an increase in the temperature of the crust, with the greatest resistance located at the equator.

It should also be noted that the basic dynamics of the earth’s structure also affect atmospheric conditions.  Therefore extremes in the weather can be expected to increase over time, keeping in mind that the process is accelerative.