Entries from October 2006 ↓

They’re rioting in Africa,
They’re starving in Spain.
There’s hurricanes in Florida,
And Texas needs rain
The whole world is festering
With unhappy souls.
The French hate the Germans,
The Germans hate the Poles;
Italians hate Yugoslavs,
South Africans hate the Dutch,
And I don’t like anybody very much!

But we can be tranquil
And “thankfill” and proud,
For man’s been endowed
With a mushroom-shaped cloud.
And we know for certain
That some lovely day
Someone will set the spark off,
And we will all be blown away!
-Kingston Trio, 1950′s

It has been suggested and none too hastily that today the world is running on hate.

From our point of view there continues to be a simple solution.

Gravity control. No more wars. Everyone is once again on an equal footing.

Wouldn’t this be the most uniting thing?

I never really thought of it quite this way before but with gravity control as a ‘weapon’ against hate, it has the look of perhaps swinging the people on this planet away from constant stress.

Oil was most wonderful in the ’20′s? But now we get the feeling that oil will kill us all.

We are at a most amazing transition.

Will we make the leap to gravity control?
Or will we fall back on the amazing German secret of turning coal into oil.

That would keep gravity control out of the picture for an estimated 200 years.

There is a reason for switching to gravity control and it has everything to do with reversing how we’re pulling this planet apart. If we want to keep living here we must stop the raping and polluting of our biosphere. At least until we can go places. But even then, it’s sacred to keep your domain pristine.

We have to clean the place up before we think about leaving. And we’re not leaving but we should clean up the world anyway.

Oil was honourable but now it’s Enron and the saving of an era.

The new era is antigravity, goodbye rockets. The new era is an equalization of the people on our planet where those who need get real help. And those who wish can explore.

Wow! Can we begin today?

We have absolutely nothing to report other than the following

Dear Lena,

Of course, your answer is not what I want to hear but do you know they’ve converted a BMW Mini to electric? It has a range of 300 miles before plugin overnight and does 0 to 60 in under six seconds. Yes, you’re right. The drive train is different. Also no gears, no automatic, just brake and go.

I like Volvo because they gave the 3 point seat belt to the car industry. I also like the interiors, the ride, handling and safety. And with the XC70 the styling is as provocative as the Isuzu Vehicross, only better because it’s in a station wagon format.

I’m sure you have things in the works.

I’m speaking of an XC70 shape of the future powered by nothing at all, meaning, capturing the power of gravity. www.gravitycontrol.org

My thought was, if BMW can make an electric Mini, Volvo can do the same with an XC70. And I’m sure you can. Safety for Volvo must transcend just the passengers and consider the planet as a whole. Electric.

I envisage the entire automotive industry shifting to electric, and beyond.
http://gravity-control.blogspot.com/2006/10/who-will-resurrect-electric-car.html

Thank you again for your thoughtful though not complete reply.

You guys are Volvo. I expect more a level of best.

Trying to contact someone of importance at Volvo is like trying to speak to the Pope, who incidentally has just banished Limbo. This came as a shock to Christian Jamaicans who have practiced this dance for centuries and have offered the Pope a request for a name change. Volvo, the name is now owned by Ford, which needs the association of safety after the Pinto and the pickup truck which used to blow up on a regular basis. Volvo is known as the safest car in the world but Ford just bought the Volvo name which includes trucks, and Volvo Cars is a company now on its own. This I learned after posting the following message to Volvo.
I would like a quote if possible on how much to convert an XC70 Wagon to all electric operation.
Thank you.
Jim
www.gravitycontrol.org

The Volvo XC70 2.5T is a manual transmission vehicle in station wagon or estate format. It was my dream car for cavorting the hills of Samui and anywhere. But now my new dream car is the same car but converted to all electric, no gas. And probably my next dream car would be the same except it would be aether driven, no fuel of any kind.

Nice car, and it comes with ergonomic seats that offer heat and a Swedish massage.

For those who might read these blogs I’ve always regretted trashing the 1947 Volkswagen as an example of how Project Unity works. But now, the new example is the Volvo XC70, definitely a prettier car and probably more comfortable.

It is commonly accepted that gravity and inertia are responsible for maintaining the orbits of the planets around the sun, in that gravity is perceived as a primary force of universe capable of allowing for the stability of this or any other solar system lasting for millions and billions of years.

It is only in recent years that the electromagnetic relationship existing between the sun and the planets has been acknowledged to exist, which has led to much speculation and experimentation in the area of electrogravitics.

Even so gravity itself still remains an enigma with many attempts being made to reconcile the relationship of gravity and electromagnetism.  So it seems somewhat strange that we should consider gravity to be a primary force of universe without yet knowing exactly what gravity is or understanding its relationship with electromagnetism.

To date no one can tell you why or how gravity holds the planets in orbit other than by describing a mathematical relationship associated with mass.

An argument is made for gravity and inertia maintaining orbital stability on the basis of astronomers calculating the motion of the planets against the background of the fixed stars with precise accuracy extending both backwards and forwards over periods of time.  But the accuracy of such extended precision cannot be confirmed or denied on the basis of calculations associated with gravity and inertia.

It must be understood that the extension of such calculations backwards and forwards in time is speculative at best, as there is no physical evidence to support such past and future events having occurred beyond the present era.

Only the confidence of astronomers in their existing standards of understanding allows for the acceptance of such speculation, even though such understanding is incomplete.

It is historically recorded that the planets and moons have not always followed their existing orbits and have on occasion altered their path of orbit and or crossed orbits involving near collisions resulting in cataclysmic events.

Velikovsky presented evidence to this effect in his book Worlds in Collision and those that followed, but for the most part his work was rejected by the scientific community.  Yet it would appear that Einstein took a sincere interest in Velikovsky’s work and agreed with much of the material presented.  http://www.varchive.org/itb/index.htm

It would appear that arguments demeaning the competency of historical recorders who claim to have witnessed the earth moved from its orbit during close encounters with both Venus and Mars are nothing more than an excuse for our inadequate understanding. It’s easier to simply dismiss the historical record on the basis of our own ignorance.

Realizing we live in a relatively primitive and barbaric world with little understanding of universe and little objectivity regarding the self imposed limitations we so guardedly adhere to, it should come as no great shock to discover that gravity is not itself a force of any kind, but simply a dynamic response.

If gravity is not itself a force of any kind it would be impossible for gravity to influence the orbit of the earth or the orbit of any other planetary body around the sun or the orbit of a satellite around a planet.

Therefore it would be equally impossible for gravity and inertia to determine the stability of planetary orbits, as orbital stability is simply the physical manifestation of a dynamic response corresponding to the condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

If we consider the condition of field to be determined on the basis of a dynamic underlying force of energy we will realize that a differential in this energy exists between all systems in motion.

And in that this underlying force is its self dynamic in nature, the differential in underlying energy existing between all systems in motion must be continuously changing.  This would suggest that the stability of planetary orbits is limited to a certain degree of dynamic variance existing between the systems involved.

Taking this one step further we might also consider that the stability of the earth in orbit around the sun, in the company of so many neighboring planets, could not be expected to be maintained for more than a limited duration due to the complexity and variance of the dynamics involved.

At the present time we are concerned with the problem of global warming, which we prefer to attribute to human industry.  Yet we are aware of neighboring planets experiencing increased warming without the aid of human industry.

Consequently many scientists deny the possibility of the sun being responsible for global warming, while attempting to convince the population they are collectively responsible for the problem and its remedy.  This allows political opportunities to be created on the basis of personal resolve to control the situation in a timely manner.    

If it were not for a differential in the underlying energy of the sun and the earth there would be no earth/sun system.  Furthermore, it is the degree of differential which determines the warming effect of the sun upon the earth and the greater the differential the greater the warming effect.

To suggest that the sun is not responsible for global warming is akin to saying an unattended campfire or a bolt of lightening could not be responsible for a forest fire, as the resulting forest fire was due solely to the tinder dry conditions of the forest, in which case we might prevent forest fires by cutting down more trees.

If all human industry were to cease immediately we would still be subjected to the effects of global warming, as global warming is the natural result of an increasing differential in the underlying energy of the sun and the earth.  Global warming is a base level response to a disproportionate increase in the sun’s dynamic energy potential relative to that of the earth.

Therefore we can anticipate global warming to increase until the earth’s orbit shifts.

Gravity does not hold the earth in orbit around the sun and the earth cannot maintain a stable relationship with the sun forever, as the cyclical nature of the solar dynamics are solely dependent on the relative relationship of those underlying forces of energy involved.

The earth is held in orbit around the sun by means of a differential in non-linear dynamics associated with an underlying force of energy which is inherently responsible for the continuous existence of physical structure and the condition of universe remaining relative to the system of reference.

Therefore an accelerative increase in the existing energy differential between the earth and the sun will cause an ever increasing accelerative variance to grow.  This means we cannot avoid the future, as it is determined on the basis of a dynamic force of energy and not personal bias.