Entries from August 2006 ↓

Fluxite, looks like a wild goose chase.

Steorn, might be an ad campaign.

According to a comment on ZPenergy, someone tried to prove fluxite and was boggled by a problem with dimensions.

Steorn, born again of the dotcom bust was an ad company capable of swinging a campaign like this.

The lesser of two feebles?

The proof is in the proving.

And both are ASKING to be proven. Instead of announcing that it’s been proven.

Fluxite and Steorn, for different reasons, two entities entering the quest for gravity control. The former exposing its patent for free. The latter, patent pending.

We have become skeptical for good reason.

People keep trying to screw with our quest for truth.

It is considered by many that our planet is slowly expanding with the rate of expansion accelerating over time, an idea with which I agree.  But many of these same people also make the assumption that an increase in the size of the earth will increase the planet’s gravity, an idea with which I disagree.

Gravity is proportional to the ratio of energy per unit of mass and not proportional to mass alone.

It is also thought that it is the compression of gravity acting upon the earth’s core which is responsible for the expansion, but this is not the case as there is virtually no gravity acting upon the earth’s core.

The dynamic structure of our planet is governed by the underlying force, non-linear time field frequency acceleration, which affects both the internal and external dynamics of our planet in an inverse manner.  Therefore gravity does not increase to the core, but increases isometrically from the center of the earth to the surface curve, while gravity increases symmetrically from the depths of space to the surface curve.  So there is insufficient gravity at the core to affect any degree of compression.

The earth’s greatest gravity is across the surface curve, but because the surface of the earth is not perfectly flat there are fluctuations in gravity with altitude above and below sea level.

Gravity is higher at the tops of mountains situated above sea level and higher over deep ocean basins and trenches.  The inside of a mountain is a vertical extension of the earth’s internal dynamics, while a deep depression or trench is a vertical extension of the earth’s external dynamics.

This provides a differential in gravity at various locations where unequal but proportional pressure is applied from above and below the earth’s surface, which in turn stresses the structure of the earth’s crust.

And as the planet is acceleratively expanding in proportion to an accelerating increase in energy affecting the ratio of energy per unit of mass, it can be expected that all matter constituting the structure of the earth should be affected proportionally.  This means that even at the micro level expansion will be experienced.

Therefore a decrease in gravity will not provide for a stable and unchanging condition, as the rate of expansion is constantly increasing simply because it is driven by a dynamic force.

It is a differential in gravity associated with vertical extremes of high and low points across the surface curve which provides the stress associated with sudden tectonic movements and upheavals, in combination with a gradual decline in gravity associated with the process of expansion.

This picture is further compounded by non-uniform distortions originating from the sun, moon and our neighboring planets, in respect to every system of universe sharing a non-uniform relationship.

A very complex picture indeed, which indicates that an increase in non-uniform distortions can be anticipated to dramatically affect the stability of our planet, especially the surface crust.

The surface crust of the earth is the location where the greatest factor of resistance is applied, which not only causes tectonic movement but also affects an increase in the temperature of the crust, with the greatest resistance located at the equator.

It should also be noted that the basic dynamics of the earth’s structure also affect atmospheric conditions.  Therefore extremes in the weather can be expected to increase over time, keeping in mind that the process is accelerative.

Alexander V. Frolov claimed success in perturbing the aether and time but could not get a patent in Russia on the grounds they said were impossible. The year was 2003.

Meanwhile, we were in contact with Professor Hal E. Puthoff, Director of the Institute For Advanced Studies, Austin in Texas. We asked if we might include him as part of our living scientists into antigravity to which he said, ok, as now posted on gravitycontrol.org.

We thought, if we could put these guys together we might just get off the ground. Frolov could reprove his earlier experiment and Dr Hal could validate it.

Perhaps a little less than two months have past, the amount of time Alex Frolov estimated it would take to conduct the experiment. And if successful, again, his experiment would be a POP for Project Unity.
Antigravity research

Perturbing the aether and altering time sounds like a mean and clever chore. It will be a triumph for Alexander V. Frolov and a big boost for Unity.