Entries from November 2005 ↓

The Clem Motor Explained

To understand the Clem Motor one must be familiar with the principles of theory associated with the underlying dynamics of field, in that the underlying force, known as Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa), determines the form and function of all physical structure.

For work to be done requires a dynamic differential in the underlying energy.

To understand the underlying dynamics we can look at a simple waterwheel, where we can examine the relationship of energy and resistance.

A waterwheel is driven by the flow of water pushing against the paddles of the wheel, while the flow of the water corresponds to a gravitational response as determined by the underlying condition of field.

The flowing water is following the path of least resistance in respect to the direction of Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa), affecting a gravitational response.  And as the water flows downhill it loses energy relative the field in which it is flowing.  In other words, as the water flows downhill the water itself loses energy in proportion to the increasing energy of the field focused to the center of the Earth.

It is important to understand that if the water itself possessed sufficient energy, relative to the field in which it is located, the water would not flow.

When the water encounters the paddles of the waterwheel, the water pushes against the paddles while the paddles resist the force of the water.

As the paddles are resistant to the flow of the water, the flowing water causes the paddles to move whereby the waterwheel is forced to turn.

But so is the flow of the water resistant to the paddles, which results in the paddles slowing the flow of the water.  And as the water slows it gains energy in relation to the underlying energy of the water, as it is an increase in energy which causes the flow of the water to slow relative to the resistance of the paddles.

In turn the paddles cause the waterwheel to turn and the faster the waterwheel turns the greater is the wheels loss of energy.

If the waterwheel was not turning it would not experience a loss of energy.
It is a dynamic differential in energy which causes the waterwheel to turn, where the wheel is losing energy and the water is gaining energy relative to the field in which the waterwheel exists.

If for some reason there is insufficient water or the flow of water is diverted away from the waterwheel the wheel will stop turning as there is insufficient power or resistance to affect the motion of the wheel.

Now we come to the Clem Motor where a fluid is employed to drive the spiral grooved cone.

The rotation of the cone causes the cone to lose energy as the cone is resistant to the flow of the fluid, but so is the fluid resistant to the rotation of the cone.  This causes both the fluid and the cone to lose energy relative to the field in which the motor is located, which affects a proportional degree of resistance relative to the accelerating field in which the motor is located.

The fluid flowing through the spiral groove in the cone does not slow down as the groove becomes shallower as the radius of the cone increases.

The decrease in the channel or groove depth is proportional to an increase in the cone diameter, and as the diameter doubles so does the circumference of the cone.  This means the fluid has to travel twice as far in the same time to maintain a constant slip velocity.  So by reducing the channel or groove depth in half the fluid velocity is doubled thereby keeping the slip constant.

The spiral channels or grooves could be thought of as very long convergent nozzles.  The increase in fluid velocity is in the opposite direction of the rotor or cone spin.  We should expect a reaction force from the acceleration of the fluid.  This thrust would be directed tangent to the circumference and would increase the spin torque on the rotor or cone.  So even without the peripheral nozzles the rotor or cone experiences a thrust force in a direction that would self-propel it.

It should be noted that as the velocity increases in the channels or grooves the pressure also increases.  But Bernoulli’s Law requires the pressure to drop proportionally as the velocity increases, but this does not happen.

As the fluid is discharged at the bottom of the cone it goes directly to a heat exchanger which reduces the temperature of the fluid, which in turn increases the underlying energy of the fluid.  So when the fluid re-enters the top of the cone the fluid is in a re-energized state.

Therefore there is a continuous dynamic differential in energy existing between the rotation of the cone and the flow of the fluid which is maintained by the continuous cooling of the fluid by the heat exchanger.

At 200 pounds in weight the Clem Motor runs at 300 degrees F, the cone rotates at between 2600 and 2800 rpm and produces 350HP on a continuous basis.

If the flow of fluid is stopped the motor stops, but as long as the fluid flows the motor keeps running.

Once the motor reaches its optimum running temperature the motor becomes a self driving system, as no fuel is consumed in the process of its operation.

A twelve volt battery is employed during the start-up, which is recharged as the motor operates.  So the battery can be employed to run electronic gauges and lights as required.

The answer, of course, shall be found in our understanding of the Platonic Solids as “harmonic” energy structures in the aether.
The Divine Cosmos
N. A Kozyrev

There are two forks in the road to utopian civilization that have been isolated where we have taken a wrong turn, twice.

The first was the dismissal of John Worrell Keely’s discoveries in the 1880’s of sympathetic vibrations in favour of the combustion engine followed by Nikola Tesla in the 1890’s and early part of the 20th century where he gave the world its first electric grid at Niagara Falls. Tesla’s discovery of a free source of energy from the aether was handily put down by Thomas Edison, George Westinghouse and J. P. Morgan who were already selling electricity to the masses and would not entertain the loss of their riches in favour of a system of wireless free power.

The second fork in the road can be pinpointed to 1931 when Otto Heinrich Warburg was awarded the Nobel Prize for his discovery of oxygen therapy. Warburg proclaimed that with simple oxygenation of the human body all or most diseases could be irradicated including cancer. His findings were simply ignored by the pharmaceutical world which went on to make billions from various wonder drugs rather than champion Warburg’s simple, cheap and effective oxygen therapy.

These two wrong turns have taken us down the road to a questionable and unsustainable future. They are the cause of wars, disease, famine and strife in a polluted world that the illuminati covet to protect their considerable holdings today.

The question now is, can we go back to those two forks in the road and make ammends that will steer humankind back on track to a future of harmony and sustainability?

Action must be taken to correct the error of our ways or the next signpost on the road of life is oblvion. The road is slick with oil, the life blood of the planet. But now we have a map to show where we went wrong.

The Aether

I recently read, “By now it should be obvious that the larger the mass the more aether flows into the atomic structure of the mass.”

This statement sounds fairly straight forward, but it is anything but straight forward.  It throws a real curve ball into the works, as it could be read to mean that the larger mass receives more energy from the aether.

In part this is true, but in part it is false, as it depends on the circumstances of the situation involved, which are not specified.  It is simply stated to represent a general rule, which is far from an accurate statement.

The Earth has a greater mass, in terms of a general perception of mass, than the moon, but there is more aether flowing into the moon than the Earth.  On the other hand the Sun has a greater mass than the Earth whereby there is more aether flowing into the Sun than the Earth.

Each atomic structure has its own field, which means that each atomic structure has its own aether flow focused to the center of field.

As a high mass atomic structure is more resistant to the field in which it exists than a low mass atomic structure the high mass atomic structures receive less energy per unit of mass than the low mass atomic structures.

In other words a hydrogen atom has more energy than an oxygen atom, because the field of the hydrogen atom is less resistant to the aether flow.

But, in a more general sense a greater mass of hydrogen, involving many hydrogen atoms, has a greater flow of aether into its structure than a smaller mass of hydrogen.

Still, a deuterium atom has less energy than a protium atom and a tritium atom has less energy than a deuterium atom, in relation to a ratio of energy to mass.

So, the idea that a larger mass corresponds to a large energy potential is not completely correct or completely true.  The idea is misleading and gives one a very distorted view of energy in relation to a proportional potential of energy corresponding to a proportional quantity of mass, as no such proportional relationship exists.

In that the mass is resistant to the flow of the aether or the mass is resistant to the field in which it exists, it would appear that the larger the mass the more resistance there would be to the flow of the aether.

In other words the larger or greater the mass, the less aether flows into the structure of the mass, because the increased resistance slows the aether flow.

The aether is a field of frequency which is continuously accelerating; therefore it is the rate of acceleration which determines the flow of the aether, consequently, the greater the resistance the slower the rate of acceleration affecting the atomic structure of the mass.

This is where assumptions become problematic, as it is assumed on the basis of energy being proportional to mass that an increase in mass would always indicate an increase in energy.

If we examine the equation E=MC2 we will see that this equation only holds true under certain conditions, such as where the ratio of energy to mass is the same for all elements.  In other words, according to this equation the ratio of energy to mass is the same for every element, when in fact such a thing is a relative impossibility.

This is an important point, which must be considered, as the idea of each and every element having an equal ratio of energy to mass distorts our perception of energy and allows us to reflect on a false assessment.

The ratio of energy to mass must be different for each and every element, otherwise there would be no dynamic difference existing between the elements, as the only difference would be a question of mass.

If each and every element is resistant to the aether or the field in which they collectively exist, then the ratio of resistance to mass would be the same for all of the elements, as it is the mass which is resistant to the aether, whereby any mass must respond to the field in which it exists in a proportional manner regardless of its mass.  This is demonstrated by two unequal masses falling at the same rate of acceleration.

It must be realized that energy and resistance are two completely different things, which work in opposition to each other.

Energy is a non-resistant force, in that an increase in energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy, whereas mass is resistant in that an increase in mass affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.

Likewise a decrease in energy affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy and an increase in mass.

The aether is the field itself in which any mass exists, and as such the underlying force of energy determines the condition of the aether or the field.

As the energy involves the dynamic potential of the aether, in relation to an accelerating field of frequency, a decrease in the acceleration of the field affects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy.

And as the energy of any element is focused to the center of the atomic structure, the element with the smallest mass must have the highest potential of energy, in relation to a ratio of energy to mass.

It should be apparent that this explanation represents a direct contradiction to that which the equation E=MC2 is attempting to convey.  In other words, the equation E=MC2 is not a valid statement.  The energy represented by E is not energy at all, as energy has been confused with resistance.

This in itself would indicate that it would be exceedingly difficult to discover a method of extracting energy from the aether without knowing exactly what energy is.

Energy is a non-resistant underlying force in the form of non-linear time field frequency acceleration determining the form and function of physical structure.

The aether is the medium of non-linear time field frequency acceleration, in that both the aether and the field of frequency are one and the same.  The aether is not something separate from the field, as the aether is the field just as the field is the aether.

In this respect it would be impossible to extract energy from the aether, as the aether is not itself something separate from energy, as the energy and the aether or the field is one and the same thing.  You could not have energy without the aether or field, so in order to employ the energy of the aether the energy must be employed as a field function.

And in order to employ the energy of the aether as a field function requires a method by which to modulate the aether itself or to modulate the field itself, as the field and the aether refer to the same thing.

So whether we call it the aether or we call it the field, it is the field which we want to modulate in order to access the underlying energy of the field.

Every atom has a field, every planet has a field, every moon has a field and every star has a field etc. and the underlying energy of each field is different.

In other words, the ratio of energy to mass is different for every system.  And to be sure we understand what this means, we must realize that the ratio of energy to mass means that energy and mass are not the same thing at all.

Now, we’ll take this one step further, if we have a gram of gold, the average energy potential of each atom constituting the gram of gold can be said to be of a certain value.  But if we separate the individual atoms constituting the gram of gold the total energy potential of all the atoms will be greater than when they were combined as a one gram bar.

If we had two one gram bars of gold and combined them into one single bar weighing two grams, the two gram bar would have less energy than two one gram bars.

This is what is meant by a ratio of energy to mass, as an increase or decrease in mass changes the ratio of energy to mass.  

I am hopeful that this explanation will make it a little easier to understand how to go about accessing an alternate energy source, as well as achieving gravity control.

© 2005 David Barclay