Entries from June 2005 ↓

An electric potential is the product of resistance, in relation to a relative differential in the underlying energy of any system.

In our modern world we employ the turning of turbines to produce an electrical potential. And in order to turn the turbines we employ water, gas, coal or nuclear power, believing each of them capable of providing the necessary energy.

An understanding of this situation is imperative in relation to achieving gravity control, as none of these provide a source of energy. But what they do provide is a potential of resistance, in that we have mistakenly labeled or incorrectly named a potential of resistance as a potential of energy.

This error originated with Einstein’s concept of a static Universe, in that he assumed an increase in linear velocity produced a proportional increase in energy, but unfortunately an increase in linear velocity does not produce an increase in energy, but affects a decrease in energy.

It should be considered impossible that an increase in velocity should be capable of producing both an increase in resistance to a further increase in velocity and a proportional increase in energy, as energy and resistance must be considered to be opposites in relation to an underlying dynamic force.

This incidentally involves a question of perception, in that we have not previously considered the existence of an underlying dynamic force to be present, which has caused problems to arise.

The most obvious of which manifests itself in our attempts to determine the most efficient method by which to provide for an economical source of energy without knowing exactly what energy is, which makes the job extremely difficult.

Take the idea of a river providing the energy needed to drive a turbine, when in fact the river or the water of the river provides no energy to the process. Water, in relation to the flow of water following the course of a river, follows the path of least resistance, in that the water is itself resistant to anything in it’s path. But the water itself provides no energy to anything in it’s path as it has no energy to spare regardless of the speed at which it flows.

It is the underlying dynamic force of the accelerating field in which the water exists which provides the energy by which the water is capable of flowing, but does not impart a potential of energy directly to the water.

As the water flows from high ground to low, the water itself loses energy relative to the underlying force of the field in which it is flowing. In other words, as a river flows from a mountain to the sea it follows the path of least resistance as supplied by the underlying field of frequency which is continuously accelerating symmetrically to the center of the Earth, while the river itself loses energy as it flows.

If this were not the case the river would not flow, but would remain frozen, which is exactly what happens when a river freezes in winter. When the temperature of the water drops to freezing the energy of the water is increased by the process of freezing to a point proportional to the field in which it exists, which causes the water to remain stationary.

As simple as this observation might appear it is not at all obvious unless the existence of an underlying force is taken into consideration.

The mere action of water flowing provides an electrical potential, due to the resistant nature of the water flowing relative to the field in which it exists. So the faster the water flows the more resistance is associated with it’s flow, which allows water to drive a turbine, which is proportionally resistant to the flow of the water. And due to the turning of the turbine relative to the field in which it exists the turbine produces a measurable increase in resistance in proportion to the speed at which it turns.

This means that the turning turbine is itself losing energy relative to the field in which it exists while increasing it’s outflow of resistance relative to the field in which it exists, which is communicated in terms of an electrical charge.

Therefore the process involved in producing an electrical charge is somewhat simplified, as all that is required is a differential in the underlying energy potential at any point within the field.

In other words we don’t need water, gas, coal or a nuclear reactor to produce electricity, as all we require is a method by which to modulate a differential in field frequency acceleration relative to the field in which we exist.

And as electromagnetism and gravity are not themselves forces of any kind, but merely dynamic responses to the underlying force, it should not be too difficult to modulate the underlying field sufficiently to moderate both gravity and electromagnetism by means of a simple field frequency modulator.

The resistant nature of an electrical charge should appear obvious to any electrical engineer, in that an electrical charge is the product of resistance and as such could hardly be considered itself to represent a source of energy.

If we mean that energy is something which does work, we are deliberately confusing ourselves and making our quest for new energy systems extremely difficult.

If energy were a resistant force, we would quickly run out of energy, as it would be impossible to sustain the dynamic integrity of physical structure on the basis of a resistant force of energy. In other words, without the continuous acceleration of the underlying force, the integrity of physical structure would fail. Therefore the underlying force of energy must be non-resistant in relation to an increase in energy affecting a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy.

It is perhaps noteworthy to mention that both Special and General Relativity were formulated on the bases of a static condition, in that Einstein, at the time, believed the condition of Universe to be static.

And if we are to determine an efficient method by which to produce electricity we must embrace the dynamic condition of Universe and make the appropriate corrections, as it is counterproductive to continue on in an erroneous manner.

From this we should realize that gravity control is not simply a matter of getting a physical mass to levitate upon command, but equally allows for a sustainable source of electricity without any further consumption of our natural resources and or any further polluting of our environment.

So, the quest for gravity control represents a significant challenge to our modern world.

The Apollo Missions put a man on the Moon, but we did not go back as originally planned to establish a permanent base.

The reason for this is rather complex, but nonetheless very important in respect to accessing space and the natural resources of space.

During the Apollo Missions we discovered that lunar materials existed in a non-uniform state relative to our Earth, which means the lunar materials are out of sync with the field of our earthly environment.

We exist in a relatively uniform field of frequency, in relation to our earthly environment. Of course there are anomalies of non-uniformity existing on our Earth, but generally speaking we exist in a fairly uniform field of frequency.

Yet, despite what we have been led to believe, all other planetary bodies maintain a non-uniform relationship with our Earth, in terms of a relative relationship.

This means that the time, space and motion of Universe existing relative to all bodies in space is different, in varying degrees. Some differences are small and others are large, but nonetheless they are different and consequently maintain a non-uniform relationship with each other.

In practical terms, we cannot eat or drink anything originating on another planetary body, nor can we grow our own food on another planetary body even if we bring our own seeds along with us. We cannot drink the water, regardless of it’s purity or breathe the air regardless of it’s content.

If we eat or drink the resources of another planetary body, that food and drink will cause us to become very ill, as we will suffer genetic deformities and cancer, as well as either accelerated or decelerated growth and or cellular replication, which constitutes a very serious situation, to say the least.

Although we will find identical elements existing elsewhere in the Universe, those elements exist in altered states of non-uniformity relative to our Earth. This means that the rate of field frequency acceleration associated with their field structure is either lower or higher than that here on Earth, in relation to past and or future conditions remaining relative to our Earth’s present moment.

Lunar materials for example are historical relative to our Earth, which means they are very old. But they are not old in terms of a uniform relationship, but old in terms of a non-uniform relationship.

If we were to drink water which might exist on the Moon or Mars it would cause distortions to occur in relation to the uniform acceleration of field frequency associated with our body cells. In other words, a non-uniform potential causes our cell structure to become distorted in relation to it’s normal form and it’s normal function.

This has been experimentally proven, dating back to at least 1971 or earlier, but it is not something which is commonly understood, as the original lunar tests have been censored whereby major portions of the test results have been classified. So, we are led to believe that we might access the resources of space safely without any great difficulty, but this is simply not true.

Without major advances in science and technology we are presently incapable of safely accessing the resources of space in any meaningful manner. In other words, we could access the resources alright, but we can’t use them, as they represent a hazard to our health and safety.

So what’s the answer? The only way we can safely access the resources of space is to develop a system which allows for a uniform access to the various planets and moons etc. And the only means by which to allow for uniform access is through the application of non-linear dynamics, in the form of instantaneous transformation and or time travel, which provides a means by which to modulate the condition of the materials themselves.

In the most simplest of terms we have to develop a means by which to alter the field frequency of extraterrestrial materials in order that they might correspond with the levels of field frequency associated with of our earthly environment.

Fortunately this is a lot easier than it sounds, as it is possible to modulate the underlying dynamics of any material in relation to affecting an increase and or decrease in field frequency acceleration.

Yet the problem involved here gets a little complicated, as our government and industry are intent on maintaining a nuclear agenda, which was and is a tragic mistake closely related to the problem of non-uniformity associated with extraterrestrial materials.

In attempting to understand the principles governing the underlying dynamics of physical structure one quickly realizes the inherent dangers associated with the nuclear agenda, as our existing concepts of energy and atomic energy is frightfully lacking and in most instances in error.

Nuclear materials exist in a non-uniform state relative to the field in which they exist, so they do in fact cause distortions to the field in which they exist, which in turn affects our environment in a manner similar to that of extraterrestrial materials.

On top of that nuclear materials have extremely low energy potentials, whereby they afford no benefit to the environment of our planet. In fact, their energy levels are so low that they suffer an energy deficiency corresponding to their non-uniform condition.

So, in effect we are caught in a bit of a trap in respect to further development, as further advances in science and technology will also unmask the mistakes of the past, which is not necessarily considered advantageous to many of those in positions of authority.

But, nonetheless we continue to work towards our goal of achieving gravity control.

In attempting to design a craft capable of gravity control it is important to consider the non-linear nature of dimensional proportions, as in relation to a dynamic system the internal portion of field is mush greater than a linear evaluation would otherwise suggest. An increase in (ntffa) accelerating to the center of field extends the time and space involved, whereby the ratio of energy per unit of mass increases to the center of field.

And as we have already discussed, the value of gravity at the center of field is zero, as gravity decreases proportionally to an increase in (ntffa).

So the question is; how do we modulate the underlying dynamic force of Universe in a controlled manner?

Some 30 years ago I drew up a rough sketch to show what I thought an (ntffa) modulator should look like and many years later I discovered a very similar system existing in nature which provides for the modulation of (ntffa), which is quite amazing in itself.

In this respect we can take a look at the xylem in plants and trees, as the xylem are situated in rings which allows for a horizontal and vertical relationship existing between each xylem cell.
And it is this vertical and horizontal relationship which allows for the internal dynamics to be modulated relative to the external field in which the plants and trees exist. And as the xylem can tilt slightly, this allows the xylem to work in a cooperative manner to lift and lower fluids up and down as required.

To get a clear picture of this we can visualize the xylem in terms of a stepped pyramid, as an (ntffa) modulator is an inverted pyramid which is turned inside out in order for it to become circular.

In other words the (ntffa) modulator would consist of a four phase field system, in the form of four tiered rings of magnetic discs with the smallest ring situated at the bottom and the largest at the top. Therefore there are four graduated rings of magnetic discs, each of which is capable of tilting from side to side and up and down, whereby focusing the center of field in any direction. This allows the craft to lift and lower and move in any one of 360 or more directions.

So we have lift and thrust without the consumption of a linear fuel supply.

Now, the problem is that we don’t know the sequence of sizing in relation to the graduated size of the four rings which must remain proportional to the size of the magnetic discs. So, in order to know how many magnetic discs are required in each of the four different sized rings we must know the relationship of each ring and each disc, plus the relationship of each disc relative to the size of the rings.

In this respect the discs must be proportioned relative to the rings, while the rings must be proportional to the discs and the lifting, lowering and tilting of each disc must be precisely calibrated as they must move in sync. If one disc is out of sync, it will throw the whole system out of balance.

Knowing how it works is one thing, but getting it to work is quite another. And in order to refine this system requires a systematic process of trial and error.

But the basic idea is to modulate the internal dynamics of the craft relative to the field in which it exists. And although the craft itself represents a system of reference, the craft itself still exists within the field of the Earth, so what we have is a field within a field in terms of a relative relationship.

Each of the discs would be mounted on a control arm, in that the control arm allows the discs to be tilted side to side and up and down.

We’re not there yet, but progress is being made.

When we consider the possibility of controlling gravity, it is imperative that we know what it is we are dealing with and in this respect we can be assured that gravity is not itself a force of any kind, but merely an affect of an underlying force whereby gravity is a dynamic response.

Energy, is the stuff that allows physical structure, in all it’s various forms, to exist in terms of a continuance of field frequency acceleration.

This takes us from the linear perception of physical reality, to the non-linear world of dynamic structure.

Einstein described a four dimensional space/time continuum, which was based on his concept of a static Universe, whereby the linear dimensions of space and the linear duration of time were considered adequate to describe the dimensions of Universe.

As the Universe exists as a dynamic condition it is essential to describe the dimensions of Universe in terms of a dynamic state.

To this end we can use the Earth as our model, whereby the Earth exists as a dynamic continuance of field frequency acceleration, in relation to a unified field of frequency remaining relative to the system of reference.

In other words the field of the Earth extends isometrically from the center of the Earth’s core to the outer boundary of Universe and symmetrically from the outer boundary of Universe to the center of the Earth’s core.

In relation to the physical structure of planet Earth, the Earth exists as a four dimensional continuance, in that there are four dimensions accelerating in four different directions. And those four directions are; in the direction of rotational spin, from the equator to the North Pole, from the equator to the South Pole and symmetrically to the center of the Earth’s core.

As the dimensions of physical structure are dynamic, it is possible to use one single term to describe all four dimensions. And that term is NON-LINEAR TIME FIELD FREQUENCY ACCELERATION, (ntffa), in that (ntffa) is continuously accelerating.

One critical consideration concerning (ntffa) is that the underlying energy of Universe does not radiate but is focused inwardly to the center of field, always.

What radiates is a factor of resistance corresponding to a differential in (ntffa)remaining relative to the system of reference. Therefore there is an upper non-absolute limit and a lower non-absolute limit to (ntffa) associated with every system of Universe, whereby every system of Universe has a different differential of (ntffa).

If the energy of Universe is focused to the center of field, this underlying energy is non-resistant, as an increase in (ntffa) affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in (ntffa). This would indicate that the energy of Universe remaining relative to the Earth is continuously increasing, whereby the energy potential of the Sun, Moon, planets etc. is also increasing.

Here I must point out that the internal dynamics of the Earth and the external dynamics of the Earth are inversely proportional. This means that gravity decreases from the Earth’s surface curve to the perimeter of Universe and decreases from the Earth’s surface curve to the center of the Earth’s core, in that the gravitational effect at the center of the Earth is zero, in relation to a non-absolute value.

In turn the electromagnetic potential of the Earth remains proportional to the gravitational potential, whereby there is an inversely proportional positive and negative charge associated with the unified field of frequency remaining relative to the Earth.

And in relation to the dynamic structure of the Earth it is physically impossible to access the internal portion of the Earth, as a hole in the ground is an extension of the external dynamics. The same is true of any physical mass, as in breaking any mass into separate pieces merely extends the external dynamics without allowing access to the internal dynamics as the internal dynamics are always on the inside and never on the outside.

Here we come to a key consideration in the development of a saucer craft or gravity control devise, as the internal dynamics must be enclosed in order for the craft or devise to function properly. In other words the control of a craft or a devise originates internally and not externally. The energy of any system is focused to the center of field and the bulk of any system’s energy exists internally.

An increase in energy extends the unified field of any system, but at the same time alters the dimensional properties of the space and motion remaining relative to the system of reference.

This is why the Moon is moving away from the Earth faster than the Earth is moving away from the Moon, as the Moon has the higher (ntffa).

In turn the Sun has a much higher (ntffa), and as an increase in (ntffa) affects a decrease in gravity it would seem reasonable to believe that the gravity of the Sun was incapable of holding the planets in orbit as described by Newton.

What holds the planets in orbit around the sun is a differential in (ntffa) existing between each of the planets and the Sun. And in this respect there is a non-uniform differential in (ntffa) existing between each of the planets and the Sun, with the degree of non-uniformity increasing toward the Sun.

So, in order for a craft to employ gravity control, the craft must be equipped to modulate the underlying energy of the craft from within, whereby the internal and external dynamics of the craft can be controlled in an inversely proportional manner.

In other words, gravity cannot be controlled directly, but can be controlled in terms of a dynamic response resulting from the modulation of (ntffa).

The craft itself must represent a unified field of frequency, where the non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to the craft can be modulated in a controlled manner, whereby affecting the space and motion remaining relative to the craft. Thus allowing the craft to move from here to there without the inherent limitations of a linear based system of propulsion.

Therefore a non-linear drive system is required for the purpose of gravity control.

Gravity causes a falling mass to accelerate toward the surface curve of the Earth, which indicates the non-resistant nature of gravity, as gravity follows the path of least resistance in relation to the external portion of the Earth’s field.

In this respect the field in which the falling occurs must itself be accelerating in the same direction as the falling mass.

This would further suggest that a factor of resistance must increase skyward, as the resistance of field decreases downward toward the surface of the Earth.

If the underlying energy of the field increases to the center of the Earth, the energy itself must be accelerating, whereby a falling mass must lose energy in proportion to the increasing energy of the field in which it is falling, otherwise it would not fall.

In other words, the field is non-linearly accelerating while the falling mass is linearly accelerating in relation to the underlying energy associated with the field and the falling mass.

And although the mass is linearly accelerating as it falls, it’s energy is non-linearly decelerating relative to the acceleration of the field in which it is falling.
If we could devise a method by which to effectively accelerate the energy of the mass it would not fall, but would rise skyward relative to the field in which it exists.

The gravitational field of the Earth is focused symmetrically to the surface curve of the Earth, whereby there is an isometric field of resistance radiating from the surface curve of the Earth, where the level of resistance increases with altitude.

This causes a mass situated far from the Earth not to fall toward the Earth as there is a high level of resistance preventing an increase in linear acceleration toward the Earth.

A rocket fired from the surface of the Earth must accelerate to a speed of roughly 25,000 MPH to escape the gravitational field of the Earth, despite the fact that gravity decreases proportionally with altitude. This should suggest that rockets are not the most efficient means of escaping the Earth’s gravity.

As the rocket accelerates skyward it must be losing energy relative to the field in which it exists, otherwise it would not move, as the process is a linear based concept of propulsion.

This explains why the rocket will fall back if it does not reach the 25,000 mph speed required to break free of the Earth’s gravity.

If an aerospace system was gaining energy relative to the field in which it exists it would not fall back even if it did not reach the 25,000 mph speed which is presently thought to be necessary. For as long as it continued to gain energy relative to the field in which it exists, it would continue skyward with no concern for the speed of escape.

At the present we assess an increase in velocity to effect an increase in energy, but this is a false assumption, as an increase in velocity effects an increase in resistance to a further increase in energy, as well as an increase in resistance to a further increase in velocity.

An increase in resistance cannot affect both an increase in resistance and an increase in energy, as it’s either one or the other, but not both.

The underlying energy of field is non-resistive, as an increase in energy affects a decrease in resistance to a further increase in energy.

If a falling mass which is accelerating affects an increase in resistance, that increase in resistance would slow it down unless it suffered a loss in energy relative to the accelerating field in which it is falling.

In other words, if the falling mass was gaining energy as it fell it would stop falling, as an increase in the energy of the mass relative to the field in which it exists would offset or counter the acceleration of the field.

Such a gain in energy relative to the field would force the mass to rise to a point where the field of the mass and the field of the Earth were in balance. Any further increase or decrease in energy relative to the field in which the mass is situated would cause the mass to either rise of fall.

So, there is a better way to get into space after all.