Entries from June 2005 ↓

In relation to gravity control, in respect to a unified field of frequency which can be modulated in a controlled manner, whereby affecting a gravitational response and an electromagnetic response, it is important to understand the relative limitations of any unified field system.

Perhaps the best example I can employ for this purpose is light speed, in terms of C, in that C is considered a relative constant.

But in determining the value of C we employ single units of measure corresponding to scalar values. And in doing so we attempt to linearize the condition of space, time and motion.

In relation to the non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to our planet Earth, light exists as a condition of field where the condition of field is determined by an underlying dynamic force I define in terms of Non-linear Time Field Frequency Acceleration, (ntffa).

This gives us the existing condition of Universe, in terms of a non-absolute upper and lower limit corresponding to the condition of field as determined by (ntffa), where the non-absolute upper limit can be described as having a value of 1 (one) and the non-absolute lower limit having a value of 0 (zero).

So, anything between 1 and 0 or 0 and 1 can be considered a relative value corresponding to the condition of field, therefore the value of C cannot exceed 1 or drop below 0, because if it does the light will vanish from the non-simultaneous condition of Universe and remain confined to the simultaneous condition of Universe which exists beyond the relative limits of the non-absolute present moment, which has been experimentally demonstrated.

However, we persist in attempting to maintain the popular concept of a linear perception and in doing so defeat ourselves in attempting to comprehend the nature of Universe.

This allows the oil companies to measure out a limited supply of gasoline without considering the fallacy of the situation, as no two gallons are equal, as each gallon is slightly smaller or larger than any other.
The simple exercise of attempting to make an absolute measurement of anything is a futile and impossible task.

Yet, on the basis of this we find general agreement in respect to the value of C being exactly 299,792,458 meters per second.

In reality we have not measured the speed of light, but measured a reflective distortion of space corresponding to a linear evaluation of time and space, which we assume adequate to our needs in determining a relative constant.

But in doing so we completely miss the boat, as we remain oblivious to the constant acceleration of time remaining relative to the system of reference. And if time is continuously accelerating the condition of field must be continuously changing, whereby the Universe continues to expand.

Therefore, our linear standards of value cannot supply us with any useful information, beyond the general scope of trade and commerce, where there is a requirement for convenient business standards.

In relation to the value of C, we have set the value of C in an artificial manner, which in fact standardizes our evaluation of Universe to fit the current agenda, which is to maintain the validity of single unit measure. In other words, scalar values are the authorized norm.

The scalar evaluation of time puts us at a very real disadvantage, as it rigs the game, whereby we run in circles measuring this and that without realizing that the values are continuously changing.

If time is accelerating, the value of C has to be considered a relative variable and not a constant. Therefore the value of time is different for every system of reference, whereby each element has a different value of time, which is why the various elements are different.

Different conditions produce different results in relation to form and function, which in fact simplifies things considerably, as this allows a reasonable explanation for the continuance of physical structure. The continuous acceleration of time allows for a continuance of physical structure, whereby the only thing which remains constant is the dynamic nature of Universe, which is expanding relative to our system of reference.

The idea of achieving gravity control could have or should have been accomplished some time ago, but we have remained blind to the obvious.

It would appear that the condition of field remaining relative to the Earth is different than the condition of field remaining relative to the Moon, so it is the condition of field which determines the gravitational relationship between one system and another. But if we are restrained by linear proportions corresponding to scalar values we assume that the weight of a mass is determined by gravity, where we describe gravity as a weak force.

And if gravity is not itself a force of any kind, but merely a dynamic response to the condition of field as determined by (ntffa), the only thing we need to do in order to achieve gravity control is build a unified field system capable of modulating the underlying dynamic force of (ntffa) in a controlled manner.

And considering that the only force allowing for the condition of our Earth is (ntffa), it should be equally obvious that our Earth is not fueled in some mysterious manner by a liquid, solid or gas. And if (ntffa) can provide for the Earth’s apparently stable motion around the Sun, it should not be too difficult to adapt this concept to an aerospace system.

We must get over the habit of employing linear terms of reference for the purpose of science and scientific inquiry, as they are not applicable to the purpose.

If a mass is in motion, it is in motion relative to the system of reference, whereby a mass which is linearly accelerating must be non-linearly decelerating relative to the system of reference, but if a mass is linearly decelerating it must be non-linearly accelerating relative to the system of reference.

In other words, the linear acceleration of a mass decreases the underlying energy of the mass, while the linear deceleration of a mass increases the underlying energy of the mass. Therefore we have a proportional relationship of energy to mass, in terms of a ratio of energy per unit of mass.

The Earth is decelerating and it’s underlying energy is increasing, but because the Moon is decelerating more rapidly than the Earth the Moon’s underlying energy is increasing faster than that of the Earth, which causes the Moon to move away from the Earth faster than the Earth is moving away from the Moon. Therefore the Moon has the higher underlying dynamic energy potential even though it is much smaller than the Earth.

The smaller unit of mass has the higher ratio of (ntffa), in relation to a relative ratio of energy per unit of mass.

Therefore the apparently continuous expansion of Universe is due to a dynamic differential in (ntffa) remaining relative to the system of reference, as the lower limit of (ntffa) is situated at the perimeter of field, while the upper limit of (ntffa) is situated at the center of the Earth’s field.

This differential is so great that the relative rate of expansion is very close to the upper limit of 1 existing at the center of field relative to the lower limit of 0 existing at the perimeter of field, in relation to a unified field system.

In other words, the past is receding isometrically from the center of field, while the future is focused symmetrically to the center of field. So, the expansion of Universe has nothing to do with gravity, as the expansion is a condition of field remaining relative to the system of reference.

The expansion is not linear expansion, as the expansion is a non-linear relative consideration, which continues to accelerate relative to the upper limit of (ntffa) remaining relative to the system of reference.

And as long as the relative rate of acceleration continues to increase the rate of expansion will continue to increase in a proportional manner. Therefore, the value of C must continue to increase as the upper and lower limit of (ntffa) continue to increase, which indicates that the value of C is not a limiting factor in respect to our potential access to the far reaches of space.

It’s been many years since I got passed the side-issues of the quest for gravity control, such as strange lights, landings, takeoffs and those claiming contact. No doubt several lifetimes have been spent unearthing those topics.

One such side-issue is the Lockheed X22a. Many websites conjecture that it is a black project and is a two man discoid fighter that employs gravity control. None of the websites have photos although some show artists’ concepts of what it might look like.

However, if you go to
http://www.unrealaircraft.com/gravity/bellx22.php
you will see a photo of the actual X22a in flight. It is not disc shaped and it is not powered by gravity control.
It has four props and is able to land and take off vertically. Since 1968.

Unless there is another X22a somewhere out there, I think this side-issue can be considered closed.

I looked at the date of the promise and realised we are now doing the work.

It’s not supposed to take a long time when you’re right but even though we believe we’re right, it’s taking longer than we thought. Big surprise.

The good news is we are uplifted in that Alexander V. Frolov, a renowned Russian scientist, has offered to help POP the theory and has expressed positive comment that it fits with some of his and his colleagues’ theories and POP demonstrations.

What is surprising regards Frolov is that with tabletop models ready to be scaled up, why are they not flocking to his door? Perhaps for the same reason they turned down Tesla after he gave them the electric grid, when he proposed he could produce free energy for all. Edison, Westinghouse and JP Morgan were probably mortified by the proposal. Free energy? So much for Tesla’s grid which they could charge for.

And perhaps the cycle comes round again.

This time, somebody, please, catch the brass ring and let’s get it started.

At this stage the promise is open-ended. But work is progressing.

I wish I could give you times and dates.

All I can say is it’s underway and should happen sooner than you think.

Gravity control is a matter of time.

During my search I have come across a few examples which appear to validate the idea of (ntffa) increasing to the center of the Earth.

The first one is an underground horticultural nursery near Sudbury, Ontario, Canada, located at a depth of 1400 meters underground, within the Creighton Mine.

At this underground site a variety of different plant species have been successfully cultivated, including vegetables, flowers and trees.

Grow lights are employed, as well as soil brought from surface sites.

The lights are turned off and on by a timed switching system as all plants require a period of night and day, where the plants rest during the period of darkness.

Not only do the various plant species thrive underground, but experience a 400% increase in their rate of growth. In other words the rate of growth is accelerated by 400%.

In relation to Jack Pine, the seeds are planted underground, where they germinate and grow for a period of 4 to 5 months. At the end of this short period a 2 year old seedling has developed.

All other plant species grow at a similar rate of acceleration. And in the case of flowers, such as roses and carnations, the colors of the flowers are vivid and well defined.

When these plants are transplanted to surface sites they revert to a normal rate of growth, but are found to be more robust and have a higher survival rate than plants started at surface. Furthermore, plants started underground and transplanted to surface are more resistant to disease and infestation than plants started at surface sites.

Results such as this cannot be duplicated at surface, even when state of the art greenhouse technology is employed.

Another underground horticultural nursery is located in the mine at Flin Flon, Manitoba, Canada, at a depth of 365 meters. Similar results are obtained, but due to the shallow depth of this site the rate of acceleration is proportionally reduced.

The second example is found around undersea hydro thermal vents, where heated water percolates from deep within the Earth. And in this instance the percolating water contains particles of rock and mineral in solution, which originated deep below the sea floor.

Here we find accelerated growth in marine life, which is effected by the percolating solution. Also, dead marine life in the immediate area of a hydro thermal vent is highly resistant to decay, which suggests that the highly energized solution affects the cellular dynamics of the marine life in a positive manner.

It should be noted that this accelerated growth is uniform, in that the plants grown underground and the marine life growing around hydro thermal vents is not genetically altered in any way.

The particles of rock and mineral in solution retain their higher dynamic state, just as the host rock of underground mine sites exists in a higher dynamic state than found at surface.

I would suggest that these two examples indicate that the rate of (ntffa) increases with depth underground, whether under the surface of the Earth or beneath the ocean floor.

In relation to experimental bore holes, it has been found that temperature increases with depth underground, but at a certain point the temperature starts to drop off or decrease with even further increases in depth underground. This seems to indicate that the temperature at the center of the Earth could be very cool, if not very cold.

It has also been found that gravity increases with depth, in that deep bore holes bear this out. But it must be noted that a bore hole extends the external condition of field and does not access the internal portion of field, as the internal portion of field is always on the inside and never on the outside.

Yet, the highly energized host rock affects the growth of plants grown underground, despite the underground site being an extension of the external field, as is any hole in the ground.

These two examples would suggest that the underlying force described in terms of (ntffa) does symmetrically increase to the center of the Earth.

It would appear that we might become somewhat confused if we did not know that there was an internal condition and an external condition of field associated with any physical structure.

This I believe has thrown us off when we consider atomic energy, as we perceive a fission reaction as accessing the internal energy of the atom, when in fact we have not accessed the internal energy at all, but merely extended the external dynamics.

In other words nuclear fission does not allow us to employ the energy of the atom, as there is a relative increase in resistance to a further increase in energy without having accessed the energy of the atom.

The underlying energy of any system sustains and perpetuates the dynamics of physical structure, which means that the underlying energy is of a creative nature and is non-destructive. Yet, from what we know we might assume that atomic energy is destructive, but without realizing that this destructive force is not energy, but merely the effect of an increase in resistance.

In other words, atomic energy is based on a false assumption of understanding, which should provide us with a very real incentive in attempting to harness what we refer to as free energy or zero point energy.

In relation to fission, a fission reaction increases the energy per unit of mass. If this were not true fission would not be possible in the first place, as an increase in energy affects an increase in the space and motion existing relative to the system of reference. In this respect one of the two pieces is smaller than the other, while one of the pieces is bigger than the other, whereby one has more energy than the other.

This is similar to the Earth/Moon system, in that the (ntffa) of the Moon is higher than that of the Earth, therefore the Moon is moving away from the Earth faster than the Earth is moving away from the Moon, in that the space and motion increases relative to an increase in (ntffa) effecting both bodies.

In terms of gravity control, we can see that the gravitational effect is decreasing relative to the higher rate of (ntffa) associated with the lunar field, whereby the mass of the Moon is decreasing in proportion to an increase in (ntffa).

Therefore we do not have to worry about the Moon falling on the Earth or the decay of the lunar orbit, as the Moon maintains it’s distance due to a differential in (ntffa) relative to the field of the Earth.

And as the underlying energy of the Moon continues to increase, the Moon will continue to move away from the Earth at an ever increasing rate.

So the trick to gravity control is controlling the underlying dynamics by modulating the energy flow to the center of field, in relation to a focusing of the field dynamics.

To better understand this we can consider a simple optical lens, such as a magnifying glass, as the lens affects the field existing relative to it without effecting the field itself, which is a pretty cool trick.

In other words the lens is modulating the field existing relative to it’s curvature, without effecting the field itself. So there are two aspects of a single field involved here, one aspect of which remains relative to the curvature of the lens and one that remains relative to the Earth.

The simplicity of this is a little awesome I must admit, but it gives us some idea of what is involved in attempting to modulate (ntffa) in relation to gravity control.

A simple lens cannot actually modulate (ntffa) in a controlled manner, as it is a fixed system, in that the differential in dynamic potential maintains a specific relationship, but if we could design a system capable of modulating (ntffa) in a controlled manner the modulator would provide us with a relative system of reference existing independent of the Earth, just as the Moon exists independent of the Earth.

So the trick to gravity control is to build a system based on the dynamics of a planet, moon, star or atom.

Here we must be sure we understand the dynamics involved, as our existing standards can throw us off.

It is commonly assumed that when an electron moves to a higher electron shell it has more energy, and when it falls back to the lower shell level is loses this extra energy. But, this is actually the opposite of what happens, as the increased velocity of the electron in the higher electron shell decreases the energy potential of the electron, but increases the energy potential of the nucleus, as the underlying energy is always focused to the center of field.

So, when we apply a charge to a ring or some other similar devise it levitates, as the increase in resistance effecting the external portion of field affects the internal portion of field in an inverse manner, whereby there is an increase in energy relative to the field in which the devise or ring is situated. But once the charge is discontinued the ring or devise falls to the floor or table top.

What we have done is temporarily increase the underlying dynamic force by increasing the potential of resistance, but not successfully modulated the underlying dynamic force in a controlled manner. But if we consider the underlying dynamics we might realize that the control must come from within the devise and not from outside.

In other words, we must design the internal portion of the devise to modulate the system in a controlled manner without an influence originating from outside the system. It must happen from within and not from without.

This is the challenge, to control the internal dynamics from within, which in turn will modulate the space existing relative to the system. The system itself will become the system of reference, whereby there will be a non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to it, which will be different from the non-simultaneous condition of Universe remaining relative to the Earth.

One might wonder how a simple field of frequency could affect the dynamics of physical structure?

To understand this we only have to realize that the molecules of all physical structure are made up of atoms, which in turn are the product of an underlying dynamic force affecting dynamic field frequency responses.

The physical matter of Universe is nothing less than field frequency response, in relation to the external and internal dynamics affecting inverse responses. Therefore there is nothing solid or static involved, as the responses constituting physical matter are purely dynamic, which means they are nothing more than a continuance of dynamic responses associated with (ntffa).

The idea of physical matter having solid substance is formulated on the basis of a purely physiological and psychological interpretation, based on our inherent ability to function and survive in the environment of our planet.

We perceive space, time and motion relative to our need to navigate and function within the environment in which we exist, in terms of sensory responses. And this in itself restricts us to a limited understanding of our environment.

However, we possess the ability to look beyond the barriers of our existing perceptions and see the true nature of Universe in the form of a purely dynamic condition. This means that we are, as is all matter, a continuance of what we were yesterday and a continuance of what we will be tomorrow, but there is no present moment where we exist in a static state. Therefore there is no now, as it is impossible to define now in terms of a single instance of existence.

Time does not stop in order that we might consider the possibility of time, as time is continuously in motion relative to the system of reference. This means that we cannot define a present moment existing separate from the past and future, as no such present moment exists.

To make this more clearly understood we must realize that time itself cannot be defined in terms of an instance or in terms of a linear duration, as no such instance or duration can be accurately defined or even demonstrated to exist, as the mere act of attempting to define an instance or a duration can only occur in the context of field frequency continuance, which is either accelerating or decelerating. And in this respect there is nothing perceivable that remains stationary in order that it might be evaluated in terms of a static state.

This is why our insistence that light speed should be considered a constant prevents us from moving forward, as we insist that it should be possible to define a constant upon which to base our assessment of Universe. In other words we want to make it possible to determine the size and age of Universe in terms of linear proportions, when in fact the Universe is not linearly structured or linearly dimensioned.

The idea that the age of something can be determined on the basis of a linear relationship undermines our ability to perceive our own situation, whereby we remain vulnerable to the errors of an abstract idea.

Any non-uniform field potential represents a hazard to the structural dynamics of physical matter, whether that matter exists within the biosphere or the geosphere. Furthermore, non-uniform field potentials affect the dynamics of the solar field system as a whole.

Therefore we might consider the non-uniform affects of our nuclear testing over the last five or six decades to have had some affect on the condition of the solar mass, as the influence of our nuclear agenda provides massive distortions resulting from the non-uniformity of our industry.

We reject such a notion out of hand, yet ponder the possibility of global warming on the basis of something we might be capable of correcting, without fully understanding the basic dynamics determining the form and function of physical structure.

Yet, we have evidence to suggest that our modern low frequency communication systems are altering the physical form and function of our brain cells, which we generally dismiss on the basis of uncertainty.

On the other hand we have the affects of high voltage transmission lines running in close proximity to human habitation, whereby young children are readily subject to leukemia and other such forms of illness associated with non-uniform field potentials.

And should we realize that our physical continuance was itself nothing less than a field of frequency, we might consider the possibility that a non-uniform potential is very effective in distorting the relative continuance of uniformity associated with our field of frequency.

To date our ability to affect change has been limited to an increased potential of resistance, which corresponds to a decrease in the available underlying energy. But should we develop high energy systems it would be possible to cause physical matter to simply vanish.

In other words it might be possible to shoot holes in the very fabric of space, whereby planes, tanks, trucks or ships could be made to simply vanish.

I give this as an example in order to make a point concerning the dangers of non-uniformity, as the affects of non-uniformity are hazardous to the various life forms existing on our planet.

A non-uniform potential results from the non-uniform underlying energy potential of a field situated within a field, in that the potential of energy affecting the potential of resistance is beyond the non-absolute limits of the uniform field of frequency in which we presently exist.

To make this point clearly understood we might consider the energy deficiency of uranium, in that uranium exists in a non-uniform state relative to the uniform field in which it exists. In other words the underlying energy potential of uranium is too low to sustain a stable field structure. And as such the uranium is attempting to adapt to the environment by decreasing it’s mass resistance and increasing it’s energy potential relative to the field in which it exists, by means of nuclear decay.

In turn uranium affects the fabric of the environment by distorting the more highly energized fields of frequency, and in this respect the more highly energized elements are vulnerable to distortion, which puts hydrogen at the top of the endangered list, whereby any molecules containing hydrogen are more susceptible to distortion than those containing elements denoted at the other end of the periodic table.

And considering that hydrogen is the basic constituent of any life form, it should not be surprising to discover that the more highly complex life forms should be more noticeably affected.

Furthermore, it can be shown that memory, in terms of learned perceptions and concepts, exist as a continuance of field frequency, therefore it is possible for the continuance of memory to be distorted, which would affect the survival of life forms dependent upon the application of learned knowledge.

This in itself might very well reduce the intellectual capacity of the human species to discern those basic requirements for survival, while increasing destructive tendencies.

At the present we generally ignore the affects of field distortion, while attempting to find more politically favorable explanations for a variety of illness and disease, including genetic alterations and deformities affecting viral and biological agents.

Consequently it is not too difficult to understand the inherent hazards and risks involved in denying the existence of field distortion, as the factors of non-uniformity are being proliferated at an alarming and dangerous rate.

Therefore the possibility of gravity control is not limited to the theoretical aspirations of a few idle dreamers, but represents a fundamental desire for the human species to survive despite the inherent limitations of existing standards.